Grushin « Sh-Tandem » or « Tandem-MAI »

Dear Justo, I see nothing and it is written "If You want share profiles of this aircraft with our visitors - mail to webmaster"... Have you done it?
 
Actually getting to the profiles is a bit tricky,
I've marked, where to click with red circles . ;)
 

Attachments

  • Grafik2.JPG
    Grafik2.JPG
    162.8 KB · Views: 804
  • Grafik1.JPG
    Grafik1.JPG
    149.8 KB · Views: 754
Thanks Jemiba, I've seen the 3 of them.
Interesting Shturmoviks with tandem wings, 1937. Very Delanne-like.
Edit: I have checked in the Docavia bool "Les Chtormoviks" and there are 2 pages, photographs and drawings about this family, pages 118-119.
 
Pics of the Grushin "Sh-Tandem" (an old Russian book also describes it as the MAI-3):
 

Attachments

  • Grushin Sh-MAI or Sh-Tandem.jpg
    Grushin Sh-MAI or Sh-Tandem.jpg
    39.2 KB · Views: 627
  • MAI-3.jpg
    MAI-3.jpg
    400.3 KB · Views: 618
  • 1241203472_snap1.jpg
    1241203472_snap1.jpg
    17.3 KB · Views: 627
  • MAI-Tandem.jpg
    MAI-Tandem.jpg
    69.5 KB · Views: 358
Two clean three-view arrangements of the Tandem-MAI (as it was also called):
 

Attachments

  • Tandem-MAI two-tone three-view.jpg
    Tandem-MAI two-tone three-view.jpg
    366.4 KB · Views: 134
  • Tandem-MAI three-view.gif
    Tandem-MAI three-view.gif
    215.3 KB · Views: 120
From Samolyete Strane Sovietov 1917-1970:
 

Attachments

  • Sh-Tandem.jpg
    Sh-Tandem.jpg
    409 KB · Views: 87
An original company model and a color profile of the Sh-Tandem:
 

Attachments

  • Sh-Tandem model.jpg
    Sh-Tandem model.jpg
    65.4 KB · Views: 72
  • Grushin Sh-Tandem.jpg
    Grushin Sh-Tandem.jpg
    165.7 KB · Views: 89
dabbler said:
Empannage evaluation
thanks, Andrew, tell me how accurate the dimensional data of this aircraft. I mean the wingspan of the main wing in all sources (Shavrov, Rastrenin ...........) is equal to - 11 m against 9,8 m (according to the latest data of the article in M-Hobby №178)
 

Attachments

  • Clip_11.jpg
    Clip_11.jpg
    64.7 KB · Views: 60
This drawing was not published by M-H. I think Shavrov, RastreninPerov
used not original reports, but some kind of secondary reference. They together
confused first flight date.
 

Attachments

  • 01.jpg
    01.jpg
    93.9 KB · Views: 77
dabbler said:
This drawing was not published by M-H. I think Shavrov, RastreninPerov
used not original reports, but some kind of secondary reference. They together
confused first flight date.

Amazing,thanks.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom