Gloster F18/37 Fighter Project ?

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
26 May 2006
Messages
33,576
Reaction score
13,703
Hi,

we know the Gloster submitted a low-mid-wing twin boom pusher fighter Project to the Specification
F18/37,but I found anther design to it as a mixed-powered concept,that made me confuse,is it a fake
or what ?.

http://www.nevingtonwarmuseum.com/gloster-f1837-boosted-fighter.html
 

Attachments

  • 5.png
    5.png
    99.4 KB · Views: 1,011
  • 2205582_orig.jpg
    2205582_orig.jpg
    18.2 KB · Views: 1,020
The boosted Gloster fighter was designed by G.Carter
allong the specifications of F18/37 but because of it's
mixedpower plants, it was not a contender...

Source : Interceptor , also mentioned by Schneiderman
 
a three views drawing from ????
 

Attachments

  • Scan.pdf
    258.4 KB · Views: 139
lark said:
The boosted Gloster fighter was designed by G.Carter
allong the specifications of F18/37 but because of it's
mixedpower plants, it was not a contender...

Source : Interceptor , also mentioned by Schneiderman

Not quite correct. The design dates from January 1940, long after F.18/37 for which the Hawker Typhoon had been selected. When Carter was briefed in 1939 on the work Power Jets were doing on jet engines he suggested this mixed power aircraft using his F.18/37 design as a starting point.
 
Yes indeed.

... In January 1940 Carter had drawn up a sheme for a fighter- generally complying- with
Spec F.18/37 , but using mixed power units , probably the first example of such a design...

(book text P.141)
 
Hi!
http://modelplanes.de/royal-air-force/jaeger-royal-air-force/gloster-f-1837-boosted-fighter-unicraft-resin/

https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=28610.0;attach=574006
 

Attachments

  • F-18 37.jpg
    F-18 37.jpg
    151.9 KB · Views: 421
  • 088.jpg
    088.jpg
    221.3 KB · Views: 537
  • 028.jpg
    028.jpg
    174.3 KB · Views: 551
I'm a bit late coming to the party but.....
 

Attachments

  • 1GLOSTF18.jpg
    1GLOSTF18.jpg
    238.6 KB · Views: 248
  • 2GLOSTF18.jpg
    2GLOSTF18.jpg
    245.5 KB · Views: 222
Many thanks Flitzer-san!! Excellent work as usual. :D

F.18/37 Heavily armed interceptor armed with 12!! x 0.303 mgs and capable of at least 400 mph
Bristol F.18/37, Gloster F.18/37, Hawker Tornado, Hawker Typhoon, Supermarine Type 324, Supermarine Type 325

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Air_Ministry_specifications
 
If you had said that to the many Luftwaffe pilots and crews brought down in the Battle of Britain it would be interesting to know what response you would have got.
 
Surprisingly,Saburo Sakai, who was the ace of the Japanese Navy, said that most of his scores were using 7.7 mm machine gun in the nose.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabur%C5%8D_Sakai
 
If they had gone with counter-rotating (coaxial) propellers, do you think the twin booms could have been eliminated?
Ultimately, "stability" for controlling such a short craft might have needed to wait on the development of "fly by wire" (as was the case of the flying wings), but I can see the seeds of a short hyper-acrobatic pusher in that design.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom