Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
As this thread has been mentioned in the MOTS Phantom thread.This is the January 1964 version of the P.1154RN.[ATTACH=full]756064[/ATTACH]What would a CTOL version with non-vectored-thrust Speys look like? One of the funny-peculiar things about the P.1154 is that the RN version was to be CATOBAR so it didn't need vectored-thrust engines. IIRC the RN version had a different undercarriage from the RAF version's bicycle undercarriage wasn't suitable for catapult launching and arrested recovery.
As this thread has been mentioned in the MOTS Phantom thread.
This is the January 1964 version of the P.1154RN.
[ATTACH=full]756064[/ATTACH]
What would a CTOL version with non-vectored-thrust Speys look like? One of the funny-peculiar things about the P.1154 is that the RN version was to be CATOBAR so it didn't need vectored-thrust engines. IIRC the RN version had a different undercarriage from the RAF version's bicycle undercarriage wasn't suitable for catapult launching and arrested recovery.
