Maury Markowitz
From the Great White North!
- Joined
- 27 February 2014
- Messages
- 187
- Reaction score
- 136
I am cleaning up the wiki articles on Swingfire and TOW. One source mentions that in the early 1960s when the US decided to move ahead with TOW, after promising the British they wouldn't, they argued there was no point continuing Swingfire because the French were replacing ENTAC with a long-range design.
I seem to recall seeing pictures of this design. Unlike ENTAC, which was the classic teardrop shape of AT missiles of the 50s, this was much longer at maybe 5 feet and somewhat wider, and had a purely cylindrical design with a simple conical nose cone. It was in the Janes' book I've asked about elsewhere.
Nothing on the Wiki seems to match this. It's definitely not HOT and much larger than MILAN. I guess I could be misremembering ENTAC, but then what was this system the US was referring to, HOT?
This ringing any bells for anyone?
I seem to recall seeing pictures of this design. Unlike ENTAC, which was the classic teardrop shape of AT missiles of the 50s, this was much longer at maybe 5 feet and somewhat wider, and had a purely cylindrical design with a simple conical nose cone. It was in the Janes' book I've asked about elsewhere.
Nothing on the Wiki seems to match this. It's definitely not HOT and much larger than MILAN. I guess I could be misremembering ENTAC, but then what was this system the US was referring to, HOT?
This ringing any bells for anyone?