I allways imagine CR.43 as a monoplane version of the CR.42. The fuselage was a very clean design for its time, cleaner than the G.50 and MC.200 fuselages.
Yes, but w/o the second wing the wing load would go through the roof, and Italian pilots were very keen of low wingloads (the Italian air-to-air combat style of early war was strictly acrobatic). That's the reason why Italy insisted with biplanes so late.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.