Reply to thread

Message

An A-10 replacement would just lob PGMs from a distance...lots of wing space for all those PGMS..yes.. the point, so where is it. Oh, and A-10 can do that. When enough forward IADS are suppressed the cannon would still be the final sweeper.. On dispersed battlefields a sector can be cleaned of SHORADS and then penetration maneuver can occur. Direct bombing is still required. Did anyone play attention to Patton or the Germans and how ground forces advanced?

[QUOTE="jsport, post: 484586, member: 7855"] An A-10 replacement would just lob PGMs from a distance...lots of wing space for all those PGMS..yes..[U] the point[/U], so where is it. Oh, and A-10 can do that. When enough forward IADS are suppressed the cannon would still be the final sweeper.. On dispersed battlefields a sector can be cleaned of SHORADS and then penetration maneuver can occur. Direct bombing is still required. Did anyone play attention to Patton or the Germans and how ground forces advanced? [/QUOTE]

Verification