flateric

ACCESS: USAP
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
1 April 2006
Messages
11,255
Reaction score
9,477

Attachments

  • 1_32b143aff795a6c284a7e5495bd266c1 (1).jpg
    1_32b143aff795a6c284a7e5495bd266c1 (1).jpg
    51.5 KB · Views: 31
  • 1_32b143aff795a6c284a7e5495bd266c1 (2).jpg
    1_32b143aff795a6c284a7e5495bd266c1 (2).jpg
    57.6 KB · Views: 31
  • 1_32b143aff795a6c284a7e5495bd266c1 (3).jpg
    1_32b143aff795a6c284a7e5495bd266c1 (3).jpg
    68.1 KB · Views: 29
  • 1_32b143aff795a6c284a7e5495bd266c1.jpg
    1_32b143aff795a6c284a7e5495bd266c1.jpg
    67.6 KB · Views: 30
Doesn't look an awful lot like a rescue vehicle - for one thing, how do rescuees get in? In the absence of accompanying documentation, I'd assume that whoever labelled it 'DSRV' didn't know what they were looking at. If anything, I'd suggest it's more like an extended duration undersea station.
 
If anything, I'd suggest it's more like an extended duration undersea station.
I had noticed that it seemed to be designed to be dropped onto a seabed, but I assumed it was part of a two stage or else multi-component system which we were missing images of the actual rescue vehicle/s.
 
I had noticed that it seemed to be designed to be dropped onto a seabed, but I assumed it was part of a two stage or else multi-component system which we were missing images of the actual rescue vehicle/s.
The whole configuration is weird. The shape looks like it's designed to freefall, with drag brakes (?) or landing gear (?) at the bottom - there are serious problems with either option for the flaps, but I can't see a third option. There's no entry port visible on top, which is where you'd expect crew access whilst submerged, and the instrumentation would appear to make that untenable. And there's no obvious propulsion or ballast, which invites the question of how the heck you get it to and from wherever you want it.

There was a somewhat-active Manned Underwater Station project in 1966-1967, which this might align with, but if so it's not well suited to the requirement.

As drawn this appears to be a device for permanently entombing its crew in deep ocean silt. Which is a dubious mission profile at best. It almost makes more sense as a free-floating crewed surface station, apart from the equipment on the upper surface.
 
The whole configuration is weird. The shape looks like it's designed to freefall, with drag brakes (?) or landing gear (?) at the bottom - there are serious problems with either option for the flaps, but I can't see a third option. There's no entry port visible on top, which is where you'd expect crew access whilst submerged, and the instrumentation would appear to make that untenable. And there's no obvious propulsion or ballast, which invites the question of how the heck you get it to and from wherever you want it.

There was a somewhat-active Manned Underwater Station project in 1966-1967, which this might align with, but if so it's not well suited to the requirement.

As drawn this appears to be a device for permanently entombing its crew in deep ocean silt. Which is a dubious mission profile at best. It almost makes more sense as a free-floating crewed surface station, apart from the equipment on the upper surface.

Maybe a bobbing near-surface system?
 
Looks like analog of Deep Cabin element of
Jacques-Yves Cousteau Precontinent 2 from 60s
 

Attachments

  • les-projets-précontinent-de-jacques-yves-cousteau-v0-6ejf4n8tx2ke1.jpg
    les-projets-précontinent-de-jacques-yves-cousteau-v0-6ejf4n8tx2ke1.jpg
    172.4 KB · Views: 8
  • les-projets-précontinent-de-jacques-yves-cousteau-v0-qkayjfi0y2ke1.jpg
    les-projets-précontinent-de-jacques-yves-cousteau-v0-qkayjfi0y2ke1.jpg
    97.1 KB · Views: 10

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom