T. A. Gardner
ACCESS: Top Secret
- Joined
- 18 February 2021
- Messages
- 1,068
- Reaction score
- 1,850
I've never heard or read the name "Drake", but it's easy to remember. I'll let you know if I come across it one day.View attachment 750295
A government history of the Pacific Missile Test Range had this photo in it. It is captioned as a "Drake" circa 1949. I can't find anything on it. Anyone got anything?
Intriguing! So, this image was taken at Point Mugu but then published in an official Pacific Missile Test Range history?
I suspect, and at this point, only have a suspicion, that it is some variant of one of the Navy's CTV, LTV, or RTV programs. That is, it is a Control, Launch, or Rocket Test Vehicle. There are numerous variations of this sort of rocket, and most are not well documented. They were relatively cheap, expendable designs used to develop various systems for what because operational missiles.Hm. It looks like a modified version of Private test vechicle, with different fins and added JATO bottle.
The middle photo has "Radiophone Co." painted on the missile. Anything on that?A flock of Drake(s)?
No clue on that nor the wingtip pod things.The middle photo has "Radiophone Co." painted on the missile. Anything on that?
I suspect they may be radar reflectors, to increase the missile signature for easier tracking. Or visual tracking aids: each seems to have individual pattern of black and white parts:No clue on that nor the wingtip pod things.
My guess is that given that the launcher is so close to the ocean that they are empty and used as floats to allow recovery of the booster section for re-use to keep launching costs down. The way the back end of them looks, they might also contain a parachute to assist in keeping the booster intact on release.I suspect they may be radar reflectors, to increase the missile signature for easier tracking. Or visual tracking aids: each seems to have individual pattern of black and white parts:
Hm, there is definitedly some cable going on from the rear part of each pod along the fin into missile. And the rear part of the pod looks like clamshell hatch bolted together.My guess is that given that the launcher is so close to the ocean that they are empty and used as floats to allow recovery of the booster section for re-use to keep launching costs down. The way the back end of them looks, they might also contain a parachute to assist in keeping the booster intact on release.
It's not "Radiophone", it's "Radioplane".The middle photo has "Radiophone Co." painted on the missile. Anything on that?
Radioplane built a number of test vehicles for engines and stuff in this timeframe.It's not "Radiophone", it's "Radioplane".
Ah, understood. Yes, it's quite probable that this rocket is Radioplane's test or calibration vechicle. Albeit I suspect that they re-used existing experimental rocket from some other project (the general shape looks... too simple)Accidentally posted - see update.
Likely. I think this rocket / missile is two-stage too with the booster separation just behind the forward set of fins. I also like they're using copious quantities of duct tape...I suspect they may be radar reflectors, to increase the missile signature for easier tracking. Or visual tracking aids: each seems to have individual pattern of black and white parts:
(viewing from the same point as camera):
* Upper right - black forward, white rear
* Upper left - all white
* Lower right - all black
* Lower left - white forward, black rear
I suppose this pattern allowed for visual tracking of how missile roll.
What's the source of the 2nd and 3rd photo, with the pods on the booster fins?A flock of Drake(s)?
Pt. Mugu archiveWhat's the source of the 2nd and 3rd photo, with the pods on the booster fins?