From Putnam's 'McDonnell Douglas', Volume I, pp. 176-9 :-
In 1932, both the USN *and* USAAC showed an interest in improved patrol and bombing seaplanes.
The Navy required an aircraft with a range of 3,000 miles, whereas the USAAC were interested in a concept whereby amphibians
would act as formation leaders and rescue aircraft alongside conventional bombers.
Douglas therefore developed two similar aircraft to fulfill these roles.
"The first to be developed was the Army Air Corps prototype...
Initially designated YB-11 in the bomber category...
While the aircraft was under construction, the concept of using mixed formations of amhibians and land-based bombers had proved
to be impractical. Thus, the experimental aircraft was first redesignated YO-44, in the observation category, and then YOA-5, in the
observation amphibian category."
Lager and more powerful than the YOA-5, the XP3D-1 also differed by reason of it's larger tail surfaces, and the fitting of beaching gear
rather than a retractable undercarriage.
"With nearly identical performance, a choice between the XP3D-1 and the (consolidated) XP3Y-1 was a difficult one. However...
Consolidated quoted a $90,000 unit price, whereas Douglas' price was $110,000 per aircraft. Consequently... Consolidated was awarded
a contract for sixty P3Y-1s..."
In anticipation of winning a possible follow-on contract, Douglas tested a improved XP3D configuration in the wind tunnel. BuAer agreed to
return the aircraft to Douglas for modification, and follwing these, the aircraft was returned to the Navy as the XP3D-2.
Unfortunately, Consolidated had also improved the P3Y, now designated the PBY, and the contract was granted for fifty PBY-2s.
cheers,
Robin.