Does anyone know about Boeing LRA?

[IKPJH;PHLO]

Boeing's New Home For Historical Archives

Airlineratings.com has been given an exclusive first look at Boeing's magnificent new home for its Historical Archives.

www.airlineratings.com

 

[TomS]

I can't find that exact iteration, but it feels likely to be part of the evolution of the 7X7/757.

Post in thread 'Boeing 7X7 aircraft' https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/boeing-7x7-aircraft.3241/post-98013

 

[Dynoman]

Looks like the 1978 Boeing 777-100 Trijet, a concept that preceded ETOPS. LRA likely is for Long Range Aircraft, which is what the 777-100 was designed for as a transoceanic aircraft.

 

[TomS]

Looks like the 1978 Boeing 777-100 Trijet, a concept that preceded ETOPS. LRA likely is for Long Range Aircraft, which is what the 777-100 was designed for as a transoceanic aircraft.

Better answer than mine. Thanks.

 

[Dynoman]

Better answer than mine. Thanks.

Well, not exactly, the first picture by IKPJH;PHLO looks more like a T-tail, because I don't see the lower horizontal stabilizer configuration. Possible this version below of the 777-100. However, I'm not convinced that this is the same aircraft. The inlet on the center engine looks shorter on the LRA aircraft.

 

[TomS]

Well, not exactly, the first picture by IKPJH;PHLO looks more like a T-tail, because I don't see the lower horizontal stabilizer configuration. Possible this version below of the 777-100. However, I'm not convinced that this is the same aircraft. The inlet on the center engine looks shorter on the LRA aircraft.
View attachment 758195

Definitely agree on the T-tail. The underwing engines also look really far outboard compared to the 777-100 trijet iterations we have already posted. It's definitely a weird one.

 

[IKPJH;PHLO]

Well, not exactly, the first picture by IKPJH;PHLO looks more like a T-tail, because I don't see the lower horizontal stabilizer configuration. Possible this version below of the 777-100. However, I'm not convinced that this is the same aircraft. The inlet on the center engine looks shorter on the LRA aircraft.
View attachment 758195

From another perspective, the Boeing LRA does not have a T-tail

 

[DWG]

LRA likely is for Long Range Aircraft

My first thought was Large Regional Aircraft, NMA probably isn't the only time Boeing's considered a regional twin aisle.

 

[IKPJH;PHLO]

Definitely agree on the T-tail. The underwing engines also look really far outboard compared to the 777-100 trijet iterations we have already posted. It's definitely a weird one.

I think the Boeing LRA looks like this,
PS; I don’t know whether the Boeing LRA’s tail is a traditional one or a T-tail, so I made both versions.