Curtiss XP-42

Justo Miranda

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
2 December 2007
Messages
7,753
Reaction score
10,970
Website
www.amazon.com
Aircraft manufacturers competed for the few in-line available engines in 1939. With the potentially deteriorating situation that a long war could create, some aerodynamic essays were performed to reduce the radial engines drag in Germany, Belgium and the USA. The Renard R-37 was introduced to the public in July 1939 as an emergency solution, in face of the prospect that France and the United Kingdom might cancel the exports of the Hispano-Suiza and Merlin in-line engines. The R-37 was propelled by a large Gnome-Rhône radial engine of 1,100 hp with a large propeller spinner which completely covered the engine front air intake.

In Germany, the Focke-Wulf Company had the same problem after realising that the whole production of Daimler Benz in-line engines had been assigned to Messerschmitt. The design team of Kurt Tank was impelled to use the BMW radial engine for the new Fw 190 fighter, a prototype of which flew in June 1939 with an extremely aerodynamic cowling and a large ducted spinner to reduce drag.

In USA the NACA published a report at the beginning of 1939 about the methods to improve the volume of cooling air flowing over radial engines. In February 1939, Seversky performed the first flight tests with the NX2597 AP-4 Lancer prototype, equipped with ducted and non-ducted large propeller spinners. In March, Curtiss decided to experiment with the new technology transforming the P-36A s/n 38-004 into the XP-42 prototype by adding a large propeller spinner and extension shaft and one air intake placed under the R-1830-31 engine, the prototype suffered serious problems of vibrations.

In May 1940, the Japanese flight tested the third prototype of the Kawasaki Ki.45 with a spinner that was almost identical to that of the Fw 190 V1. The NX21755 c/n 142 Vultee 48 fighter flew for the first time in September with an equipment similar to that of the Curtiss XP-42.

By mid 1939 the Northrop Company tested the A-17A s/n 36-184 bomber with ducted and non-ducted large propeller spinners and several nose and side mounted blowers configurations. In United Kingdom, the Hawker Company performed several late experiments by the beginning of 1945, modifying the Tempest Mk.V NV768 with several types of ducted spinners.

As a result of all this research, however, there was not any significant aerodynamic achievement. The R-37 was captured by the Germans before starting its flight tests and the Fw 190 V1, the Curtiss XP-42, the Vultee 48, the Kawasaki Ki.45-03 and the Seversky Lancer all encountered insurmountable cooling problems and had to be refitted with conventional cowlings. The A-17 A was turned back to its original configuration and back to operations.

Curtiss XP-42 technical data

Wingspan: 37.3 ft (11.37 m), length: 29.5 ft (8.99 m), height: 10 ft (3.05 m), wing area: 235 sq.ft (21.83 sq.m), max speed: 314 mph (506 kph), max weight: 6,259 lbs (2,839 kg), service ceiling: 31,000 ft (9,450 m).
 

Attachments

  • 185.jpg
    185.jpg
    345.4 KB · Views: 335
  • 186.jpg
    186.jpg
    217.2 KB · Views: 319
The Hawk 75S/XP-42 was powered by a 1,050 hp R-1830-31 (presumably with its 20-inch extension shaft later removed). Although constructed by Curtiss, the concept should be attributed to NACA's Langley Laboratory (specifically to the Air-Cooled Engine Installation Group).

Members of the Air-Cooled Engine Installation Group working on the XP-42 included James R. Thompson (Pratt & Whitney Aircraft); Howard S. Ditsch (Curtiss-Wright Corporation); William S. Richards (Wright Aeronautical Corporation, not USAAC as claimed by some online sources); and, interestingly, Peter Torraco (Republic Aviation Corporation).

-- https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19930092652/downloads/19930092652.pdf
 
Hi!
These are same aircraft?
 

Attachments

  • Same aircraft.jpg
    Same aircraft.jpg
    135.5 KB · Views: 50
Hi! XP-42 final configuration.
 

Attachments

  • Curtiss_XP-42_in_flight_1945.jpg
    Curtiss_XP-42_in_flight_1945.jpg
    314.5 KB · Views: 59
I have a feeling that the 75S and XP-42 initial model are very similar but different airplanes.
XP-42 initial model spinner seems to be larger than 75S spinner.
 
Last edited:
The Model 75S may have known different iterations as a company demonstrator because it was purchased by the Air Corps as the XP-42.
 
I have a feeling that the 75S and XP-42 initial model are very similar but different airplanes.
XP-42 initial model spinner seems to be larger than 75S spinner.

Your "feeling" is at odds with reality. There was only 1 XP-42, (despite the multiple Curtiss in-house designations - one for each configuration/modification).

The fourth production P-36 (serial 38-004) became a development platform for a direct successor, designated XP-42 by the USAAC. The XP-42 was powered by a Pratt & Whitney R-1830 "Twin Wasp" engine fitted with a longer, streamlined cowling and a large propeller spinner. These features attempted to improve the aerodynamics of the air-cooled radial engine.

When the XP-42 first flew in March 1939, it proved to be faster than the P-36. However, the P-40 was faster still and the new nose cowling caused engine cooling problems that proved to be unresolvable, despite at least 12 sets of modifications, which ultimately resulted in a shorter and less streamlined cowling closely resembling the original P-36 Hawk. The XP-42 project was canceled. However, the XP-42 prototype was retained as a test-bed and was later fitted with an all-moving tail (stabilator), for research purposes. This aircraft was scrapped on July 15, 1947.
 

Attachments

  • XP-42 initial shape.jpg
    XP-42 initial shape.jpg
    136 KB · Views: 38
  • 00102394.jpg
    00102394.jpg
    279.6 KB · Views: 33
  • xp-42.jpg
    xp-42.jpg
    301.2 KB · Views: 28
  • 75S Ohio 1939.jpg
    75S Ohio 1939.jpg
    280.6 KB · Views: 29
  • 00098971.jpg
    00098971.jpg
    59.1 KB · Views: 33
Last edited:
Later shape.

 

Attachments

  • 00102396.jpg
    00102396.jpg
    202.7 KB · Views: 34
  • 78b33dca-fa0a-4dcc-b3da-1108584b783d.jpg
    78b33dca-fa0a-4dcc-b3da-1108584b783d.jpg
    125.9 KB · Views: 30
  • 776ea6ec-4a19-4ba8-9123-f89c26c02c55.jpg
    776ea6ec-4a19-4ba8-9123-f89c26c02c55.jpg
    83 KB · Views: 40
Last edited:

Experimental fighter Curtiss XP-42 USA​

byakin 20.04.2015 5
2

Add to favourites0

When in 1935 the American aircraft manufacturer Curtiss, at its own risk and peril, built the then modern all-metal monoplane fighter Model 75 Hawk with retractable main landing gear and a closed pilot's cockpit, it was impossible to imagine that the highlighted features of this aircraft would form the basis of many successful fighters of the Second World War.

In 1936, the Model 75 entered a competition for a new fighter aircraft organized by the United States Army Air Corps (USAAC). The main competitor of the Curtiss aircraft was the experimental fighter AP-1, designed by Alexander Prokofiev-Seversky and Alexander Kartveli, which became the winner of this competition [1] . Nevertheless, the USAAC ordered three Y1P-36 prototypes, which, like the P-35, were to be equipped with a Pratt & Whitney R-1830 twin-row radial engine producing 1,050 hp (772 kW). Equipped with a new power plant (the prototype flew with a 900-hp [662 hp] Wright R-1670 twin-row radial engine), the Model 75 demonstrated slightly improved performance, production manufacturability, and development potential. The consequence of this was a shift in USAAC interest from the Seversky P-35 fighter, for which there were no more orders, to the Curtiss machine, which, under the official designation P-36A, was ordered in 1937 in the amount of 210 units [2] . The P-36A fighter was the main aircraft in service with USAAC units until 1941, when it began to be supplemented and replaced by the Curtiss P-40.

At the time the P-36A was adopted by the USAAC and formed the backbone of its fighter units, it was the most modern and best-armed fighter in the world. It seemed that Curtiss had secured its place at the very top for many years. However, progress was moving at an unprecedented rate. This was especially noticeable in Great Britain (Rolls-Royce), France (Hispano-Suiza) and Germany (Daimler-Benz, Junkers), where powerful twelve-cylinder in-line water-cooled engines were created. These new engines not only offered great scope for development, but also made it possible to build a fighter that was free of the drag-inducing radial engine [3] and had a small fuselage cross-section.

In the United States, the Air Materiel Command of the Army Air Forces (USAAF) decided to begin developing a new fighter. The Curtiss company received a contract for experimental design work on two types of aircraft, which received the military designations P-40 and P-42. The first of these was an improved P-36A airframe with a new twelve-cylinder Allison V-1710-19 engine installed on it, developing 1,150 hp (845 kW). In this form, the new experimental fighter XP-40 (Model 75P) made its first flight on October 14, 1938 and became the basis for a large family of fourteen thousand machines of many different modifications.

The experimental P-42 fighter was to be equipped with a radial engine, but with reduced drag. It was not that the Americans did not trust liquid-cooled engines [4] , but in the United States the use of radial engines had a long tradition, which implied many advantages of these engines. In addition, manufacturers were preparing to provide new engines with much higher performance. The subsequent fate of the Allison engine only confirms this: despite strong government support, the company was unable to create an excellent engine on the basis of the V-1710, capable of developing the necessary power.

In developing the P-42 experimental fighter, Curtiss used the fourth series P-36A airframe (serial number 38-004), which housed a 1,200-horsepower (882 kW) Pratt & Whitney R-1830-31 Twin Wasp twin-row radial engine in the nose. An extended shaft was located in the front part of the engine crankcase, which rotated a three-bladed propeller. The entire structure was carefully cowled, and the propeller was equipped with a fairing with a large cone. Cooling air entered the engine through a large air intake located below the propeller fairing. An air intake for the engine supercharger was located on the top of the cowling. Hot air was exhausted from the engine compartment through conventional controlled flaps located along the perimeter of the rear part of the cowling, as on conventional radial engines.

The Buffalo-based Curtiss plant completed the conversion of 38-004 in March 1939, and the aircraft was flown to Wright Field for official USAAC testing that same month. As the pessimists had predicted, engine cooling problems were discovered immediately after the first tests. The large scoop-shaped air intake below the propeller and the guide chute inside the cowling failed to supply the engine (and especially its rear cylinders) with sufficient air. During ground testing and subsequent takeoffs, the temperature gauge hovered dangerously close to the red line. During level flight, the first and only unarmed XP-42, due to significant engine wear, was able to reach a speed of 345 mph (554 km/h) . [5]

At Wright Field, the XP-42 was tested for several months, during which the aircraft, with washable paint applied to its surface, took part in maneuvers. A little later, the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) joined the testing of the machine, but there were no improvements. The propeller hub fairing was reduced, the engine air intake was enlarged and moved. Ultimately, the shaft located inside the cowling was reduced and the scoop-shaped air intake was removed, replacing it with a conventional round one. In the end, the XP-42 tested a classic cowling with a reduced cone and "cuffs" installed for forced cooling on the propeller blades near the spinner.

In the early 1940s, the US Army Air Forces lost interest in the XP-42 and the only aircraft of this type was transferred to NACA. From 1942 onwards, various engine cooling flaps, propellers and, finally, an all-moving stabilizer were tested on the XP-42. Eventually, the fighter was put into temporary storage and finally scrapped in January 1947.

Experimental fighter Curtiss XP-42 USA

schemes of the original version of the Curtiss XP-42 paint scheme of the experimental Curtiss XP-42 fighter the original version of the experimental Curtiss XP-42 fighter (Model 75S) on the ground without camouflage and in camouflage paint the original version of the experimental Curtiss XP-42 fighter (Model 75S) in flight in 1941 the experimental Curtiss XP-42 fighter was blown through a wind tunnel, testing different cowling shapes, including solid ones with one, three, four air intakes of different shapes and sizes. These studies are the subject of a report from October 1941. Diagram of the intermediate version of the engine cowling of the experimental Curtiss XP-42 fighter. Intermediate version of the experimental Curtiss XP-42 fighter on the ground. Diagram of the final version of the experimental Curtiss XP-42 fighter. Diagram of the final version of the engine cowling of the experimental Curtiss XP-42 fighter (with high air intake velocity). Cowling version of the experimental Curtiss XP-42 fighter with low air intake velocity . The final version of the experimental Curtiss XP-42 fighter on the ground; note the "cuffs" put on the blades near the propeller spinner. Test results of engine cowling variants of the experimental Curtiss XP-42 fighter. Top view of the final version of the experimental Curtiss XP-42 fighter with the horizontal tail replaced by an all-moving stabilizer. The final version of the experimental Curtiss XP-42 fighter on the ground and in flight; note the new all-moving stabilizer.
Experimental fighter Curtiss XP-42 USA

Experimental fighter Curtiss XP-42 USA
Experimental fighter Curtiss XP-42 USA
Experimental fighter Curtiss XP-42 USA

Experimental fighter Curtiss XP-42 USA

Experimental fighter Curtiss XP-42 USA
Experimental fighter Curtiss XP-42 USA
Experimental fighter Curtiss XP-42 USA
Experimental fighter Curtiss XP-42 USA

Experimental fighter Curtiss XP-42 USA

Experimental fighter Curtiss XP-42 USA
Experimental fighter Curtiss XP-42 USA

Experimental fighter Curtiss XP-42 USA

Experimental fighter Curtiss XP-42 USA

Experimental fighter Curtiss XP-42 USA

Experimental fighter Curtiss XP-42 USA
Experimental fighter Curtiss XP-42 USA

Experimental fighter Curtiss XP-42 USA

Experimental fighter Curtiss XP-42 USA

Experimental fighter Curtiss XP-42 USA
Experimental fighter Curtiss XP-42 USA


FLIGHT PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS [6]​

Type: experimental fighter, experimental aircraft

Crew: 1 person

Manufacturer: Curtiss-Wright Corp., Airplane Division Buffalo, New York

Powerplant: Pratt & Whitney R-1830-31 Twin Wasp, 14-cylinder, twin-row radial engine producing 1,200 hp (882 kW) and driving a three-bladed propeller

Dimensions:

wingspan 11.35 m
length 9.22 m
height 3.37 m
wing area 21.92 m²

Weight:

empty 2185 kg
takeoff 2840 kg

Flight characteristics:

maximum speed at 4500 meters 554 km/h
cruising speed 430 km/h
service ceiling 9600 m
flight range 1175 km

Armament: not installed; it was planned to install four 7.62 mm machine guns in the wing consoles and two synchronized 12.7 mm machine guns in the fuselage

Number of produced: 1 copy


  1. In April 1936, the aircraft won the competition at Wright Field, Ohio, scoring 812 points against 720 points for its closest competitor, the Curtiss fighter. Curtiss officials set a price of $29,410 for the aircraft for a batch of 25 aircraft and $14,150 for a batch of 250 aircraft. The Prokofiev-Seversky and Kartveli aircraft were more expensive: $34,900 and $15,800, respectively. The Seversky Aircraft Company received a government order for a series of 77 aircraft, which received the military designation P-35.
  2. It was the largest order for military aircraft in the United States since World War I.
  3. Although NACA streamlined cowlings were developed, they only slightly reduced the high drag
  4. Ten years before the events described, the Curtiss company created an excellent twelve-cylinder engine V-1570 Conqueror, which developed a power of 600 hp (441 kW)
  5. Under similar conditions, the P-36A reached a speed of 504 km/h, while the XP-40 reached 558 km/h.
  6. The data refers to the original version of the Curtiss XP-42 (spring 1939). After numerous changes, the length was reduced to 8.68 meters, and the weight of the aircraft was also reduced
sources:

 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom