Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
Hon. Douglas Feith, Senior Fellow and Director, Center for National Security Strategies, Hudson Institute; Former Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, spoke to the Center for Security Policy’s National Security Group Lunch on Capitol Hill on the topic of: The Obama Administration’s Pending One-Third Cut to the Nuclear Arsenal — National Security Implications http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2013/02/25/douglas-feith-the-obama-administrations-pending-one-third-cut-to-the-nuclear-arsenal/ I talk often, in other terms, of dissuasion you have to have an arsenal big enough to dissuade others from trying to match us. I think we no longer dissuade others, especially, China who are rising to match us. Former SecState Clinton said openly, "We welcome the rise of China" and part of that is falling to meet them on the way up. The other part I agree with in is to stop the thought process saying only by 'maximizing reductions' can we maximize security, Feith argues these two things are not interchangable in fact at some point a low number will increase the likelihood of war and lessen security.
Hon. Douglas Feith, Senior Fellow and Director, Center for National Security Strategies, Hudson Institute; Former Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, spoke to the Center for Security Policy’s National Security Group Lunch on Capitol Hill on the topic of: The Obama Administration’s Pending One-Third Cut to the Nuclear Arsenal — National Security Implications
http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2013/02/25/douglas-feith-the-obama-administrations-pending-one-third-cut-to-the-nuclear-arsenal/
I talk often, in other terms, of dissuasion you have to have an arsenal big enough to dissuade others from trying to match us. I think we no longer dissuade others, especially, China who are rising to match us. Former SecState Clinton said openly, "We welcome the rise of China" and part of that is falling to meet them on the way up.
The other part I agree with in is to stop the thought process saying only by 'maximizing reductions' can we maximize security, Feith argues these two things are not interchangable in fact at some point a low number will increase the likelihood of war and lessen security.
