On this thread here
www.tapatalk.com
on Alternate Lord Nelsons, John French has noted
In 1897, the DNO, Captain Kane, made a suggestion for the Cressy class cruisers, then being designed, that power loading technology had advanced to a level where a 9.2-inch gun could be utilized as a reliable rapid fire weapon that it could replace the 6-inch in the rapid fire role, allowing the Cressy’s to carry a uniform armament of 9.2-inch guns. This very forward thinking suggestion was rejected,
So what would be the implications of a uniform 9.2" Cressy?
What happens when what would become the Monmouth class get designed?
What does an all uniform 9.2" gun cruiser do for battleships?
![www.tapatalk.com](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fheader.tapatalk-cdn.com%2Fc1927363.jpg&hash=c4f32a704f6e91579a5cb23aa96d534f&return_error=1)
All the World's Battlecruisers-Alternative Lord Nelsons.
Hello (Sorry, posted this question already in another forum but want to hear some opinions here) The Lord Nelson preliminary desings include a number
on Alternate Lord Nelsons, John French has noted
In 1897, the DNO, Captain Kane, made a suggestion for the Cressy class cruisers, then being designed, that power loading technology had advanced to a level where a 9.2-inch gun could be utilized as a reliable rapid fire weapon that it could replace the 6-inch in the rapid fire role, allowing the Cressy’s to carry a uniform armament of 9.2-inch guns. This very forward thinking suggestion was rejected,
So what would be the implications of a uniform 9.2" Cressy?
What happens when what would become the Monmouth class get designed?
What does an all uniform 9.2" gun cruiser do for battleships?