Very interesting first configuration with the v tail. Was dropped due to the wing stalling at just 5° aoa.

From "Killer Rays: Story of the Douglas F4D Skyray and F5D Skylancer" by Mark Frankel,
 

Attachments

  • tmp_4933-IMG_20151028_190559649551264.jpg
    tmp_4933-IMG_20151028_190559649551264.jpg
    49.1 KB · Views: 206
  • tmp_4933-IMG_20151028_190620101256100.jpg
    tmp_4933-IMG_20151028_190620101256100.jpg
    57.9 KB · Views: 162
  • tmp_4933-IMG_20151028_190646-248557135.jpg
    tmp_4933-IMG_20151028_190646-248557135.jpg
    65.8 KB · Views: 155
  • tmp_4933-IMG_20151028_190717-1674156360.jpg
    tmp_4933-IMG_20151028_190717-1674156360.jpg
    84.6 KB · Views: 202
  • tmp_4933-IMG_20151028_1907391675940664.jpg
    tmp_4933-IMG_20151028_1907391675940664.jpg
    64 KB · Views: 235
Hi!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0FTCMBrq6c
 
The last picture is interesting and a first for me: an F-92 with dual lateral intakes instead of a single nose intake? I'd like to know more about this.
 
Skyblazer said:
The last picture is interesting and a first for me: an F-92 with dual lateral intakes instead of a single nose intake? I'd like to know more about this.
The last picture you mention, I feel, shows the XF-92A and the upcoming YF-102 (pre-YF-102 if you will). -SP
 
Steve Pace said:
The last picture you mention, I feel, shows the XF-92A and the upcoming YF-102 (pre-YF-102 if you will). -SP

Except this particular image is clearly an XF-92 that has been doctored, not one of the YF-102 images.
The air intakes do not look at all like the ones that were actually built (you can see they blend in a lot more with the fuselage here). The cockpit is a little different, and the jet exhaust reaches far behind, unchanged from the XF-92 photo (whereas the YF-102 had a shorter rear with modified, not tubular, shape).
 
The last XF-92 image with funky side intakes is in Scott's XF-92 article (http://aerospaceprojectsreview.com/ev3n1.htm). I'm looking right at it.

Scott credits the photo to the SDAM via Mark Nankivil
 

Attachments

  • Pages from usfp03_Page_6.jpg
    Pages from usfp03_Page_6.jpg
    22.1 KB · Views: 193
  • Pages from usfp03_Page_5.jpg
    Pages from usfp03_Page_5.jpg
    25.9 KB · Views: 202
  • Pages from usfp03_Page_4.jpg
    Pages from usfp03_Page_4.jpg
    34.6 KB · Views: 339
  • Pages from usfp03_Page_3.jpg
    Pages from usfp03_Page_3.jpg
    32.2 KB · Views: 359
  • Pages from usfp03_Page_2.jpg
    Pages from usfp03_Page_2.jpg
    35.7 KB · Views: 367
  • Pages from usfp03_Page_1.jpg
    Pages from usfp03_Page_1.jpg
    73.9 KB · Views: 354
  • Pages from usfp03_Page_7.jpg
    Pages from usfp03_Page_7.jpg
    26.2 KB · Views: 206

Attachments

  • metadc58295_m_00017.med_res.jpg
    metadc58295_m_00017.med_res.jpg
    52.5 KB · Views: 143
Thank you vey much for all the wonderful information regaring the early prototype of the XF-92 based on the work started by Alexander Lippisch into delta wing aircraft
 
This is a photograph of the XF-92A on display at an open house at Bees Air Force Base, New Hampshire, in May 1955. The design closely follows the delta wing theory of Dr. Alexander M. Lippish, so the style is very similar to the delta wing experimental glider MD-1 created during World War II. The large vertical stabilizer is located relatively forward. The unusually long tailpipe is due to the installation of afterburner on the J33 engine.

Source : FAMOUS AIRCRAFT OF THE WORLD CONVAIR F-102 DELTA DAGGER
 

Attachments

  • XF-92A.jpg
    XF-92A.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 81
The design closely follows the delta wing theory of Dr. Alexander M. Lippish,
*SORT* *OF.* Yes, the planform & side views are very similar, but the airfoil sections are *very* different. Lippisch favored *fat* airfoils that would not have let this thing go transonic. The XP-92 and subsequent delta winged aircraft had *thin* wings with relatively sharp leading edges. These are not minor feature differences.
 
Hi!

 

Attachments

  • 2b2eb12c-c722-433d-b47c-6784b03beebd.jpg
    2b2eb12c-c722-433d-b47c-6784b03beebd.jpg
    214.4 KB · Views: 22
  • 5fa4638b-a721-4800-826d-a6fb5c393a8f.jpg
    5fa4638b-a721-4800-826d-a6fb5c393a8f.jpg
    141.5 KB · Views: 20
  • 71c2c185-13ff-4114-a03d-062c15759d1f.jpg
    71c2c185-13ff-4114-a03d-062c15759d1f.jpg
    142.8 KB · Views: 25
  • 38255ee6-0673-4d93-897f-6095a6ab8203.jpg
    38255ee6-0673-4d93-897f-6095a6ab8203.jpg
    180.5 KB · Views: 24
  • 071016-F-1234S-012.jpg
    071016-F-1234S-012.jpg
    136 KB · Views: 21
  • 151106-F-DW547-003.jpg
    151106-F-DW547-003.jpg
    290.9 KB · Views: 23
  • 240528-F-IO108-041.jpg
    240528-F-IO108-041.jpg
    164.1 KB · Views: 24
  • 240528-F-IO108-052 (1).jpg
    240528-F-IO108-052 (1).jpg
    137.3 KB · Views: 25
  • bd81a92f-cb74-4806-8c3b-c75017657046.jpg
    bd81a92f-cb74-4806-8c3b-c75017657046.jpg
    466.6 KB · Views: 19
  • c1a46278-631b-4342-a087-863250c8e4f2.jpg
    c1a46278-631b-4342-a087-863250c8e4f2.jpg
    406.8 KB · Views: 22
  • d7b845b3-d6b5-450e-9ab1-867c0420c61d.jpg
    d7b845b3-d6b5-450e-9ab1-867c0420c61d.jpg
    135.4 KB · Views: 28
  • df03be3f8a4fe1bd83e92629f50d77af.jpg
    df03be3f8a4fe1bd83e92629f50d77af.jpg
    38.3 KB · Views: 32
  • f7dd3bf6-16a6-441b-9607-ecf484b91e06.jpg
    f7dd3bf6-16a6-441b-9607-ecf484b91e06.jpg
    185 KB · Views: 31
  • fa31263f-436b-44a6-bcb7-2df4a092e8ef.jpg
    fa31263f-436b-44a6-bcb7-2df4a092e8ef.jpg
    90.6 KB · Views: 30

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom