He said *if* we go to war with them - something he explicitly stated he didn't want to happen - *then* we should use tacnukes on their nuke sites, rather than send in a vast number of ground troops. That's a valid strategy. But it's also a different statement than "I want to nuke Iran."
Take nukes out of it. Instead, let's say he said "If Iran nukes Tel Aviv, the US should respond by sending conventionally armed cruise missiles to take out the Iranian leadership." Now, does that translate to "Hunter wants to take out the Iranian leadership with missiles?"
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.