Boeing QSP studies (military and civil)

flateric

ACCESS: USAP
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
1 April 2006
Messages
11,053
Reaction score
8,512
Boeing QSP studies were divided in 'mission-derived' and 'shape-derived' (in terms od aerodynamic configuration to supress sonic boom) vehicles, some of second group were patented and represented really weird beasts. Note how 'strike' mission-derived configuration resembles Northrop Grumman X-47C JUCAS and thier possible (while being nearsonic) NGLRS congiguration. Year is 2003.

AIAA 2003-0556

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES AND TECHNOLGY INTEGRATION FOR SUPERSONIC AIRCRAFT OF LOW PERCEIVED SONIC BOOM
Peter M. Hartwich, Billy A. Burroughs, James S. Herzberg, and Curtiss D. Wiler
The Boeing Company – Phantom Works
Huntington Beach, CA 92647-2099
 

Attachments

  • boeQSPairlifterconcepts.jpg
    boeQSPairlifterconcepts.jpg
    15.4 KB · Views: 310
  • boeQSPshapederived4s.jpg
    boeQSPshapederived4s.jpg
    8 KB · Views: 162
  • boeQSPshapederived3s.jpg
    boeQSPshapederived3s.jpg
    11.6 KB · Views: 140
  • boeQSPshapederived1as.jpg
    boeQSPshapederived1as.jpg
    35.6 KB · Views: 135
  • boeQSPshapederived2s.jpg
    boeQSPshapederived2s.jpg
    24.7 KB · Views: 237
  • boeQSPshapederived1s.jpg
    boeQSPshapederived1s.jpg
    8.5 KB · Views: 243
  • boeQSPstrikeconcepts.jpg
    boeQSPstrikeconcepts.jpg
    26.1 KB · Views: 282
  • boeQSPrecceconcepts.jpg
    boeQSPrecceconcepts.jpg
    9.5 KB · Views: 267
flateric said:
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES AND TECHNOLGY INTEGRATION FOR SUPERSONIC AIRCRAFT OF LOW PERCEIVED SONIC BOOM
Can't read the entire thing but are some of those things derivations of Busemann's sonic boomless biplane or is it just a coincidence?
 
Boeing calls it 'an unique Arch(ed) Wing'. Seems that they stated it as their propertiary design.
If you'l check Boeing patent http://tinyurl.com/2hcc6g, you will see that idea is not dead and used in quite a hell interesting vehicles, I assume that some has relationship to FALCON (Force Application and Launch from CONUS) Phase I research, but can be wrong. At least, talks are about global reach, hypersonic bus vehicles spreading submunitions and able to land at aircraft carriers after completing the mission.
 
Originally posted by CammNut
"Boeing ended up working on a QSP design using Reno's supersonic natural laminar flow technology. The only thing I have to hand on that concept is PopSci's artwork..."
 

Attachments

  • BoeingQSP.gif
    BoeingQSP.gif
    8.1 KB · Views: 128
It's not Reno/Tracy - it's much more horrible than that. The middle wing rotates to lie flat along the top of the fuselage, and there is some weird energy-addition stuff going on with the mid-body exhaust.

I suspect that the DARPA people thought that it was another attempt by Boeing (cf their brilliantly executed whacking of the HSCT project) to infiltrate and destroy any supersonic transport project.
 
To illustrate this nightmare - scan courtesy by Matej
Top view is here http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=2628.0;attach=21045
 

Attachments

  • 07-12-2004 07_09_20PM.JPG
    07-12-2004 07_09_20PM.JPG
    81.4 KB · Views: 140
Another Boeing QSJ
 

Attachments

  • BoeingQSJ.jpg
    BoeingQSJ.jpg
    66.9 KB · Views: 174
LowObservable said:
It's either a Mach 2 Victor or the Fireflash SST from Thunderbirds.

The Fireflash.
 

Attachments

  • Fireflash.jpg
    Fireflash.jpg
    11.5 KB · Views: 89

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom