DonaldM said:Artist impression of Boeing 767-X concept also known as "The Hunchback of Mukilteo".
Source: http://www.boeingimages.com/archive/Boeing 767-X Concept, 1986-2JRSXLJ8PSVI.htmlIn 1986 Boeing announced the 767-X, a partial double-deck design with a 757 body section mounted over the aft main fuselage, extended wings, and a wider cabin. The proposal received little interest. The efforts to provide airlines with increased passenger capacity continued and eventually gave birth to the Boeing 777 in 1995.
Hmmm...yes, looks similar-ish. Good call. I guess it could have worked. But such a big hump is probably redundant these days with miniaturized components. The Boeing E-7 Wedgetail and Saab 2000 Erieye have much smaller, more compact arrangements.Check out the 767-200 Airborne Surveillance Testbed, an Army program. Similar hump size, but over the cockpit.A silly question perhaps, but could these concepts have made a good basis for an AWACS/AEW platform?
View attachment 675288
I had heard that a full-length upper deck would have run the aircraft out of baggage volume.By 1986 first class was evaporating outside SEAsia where it was expanding. Logic of 757/piggy-back 767 was to segregate (what Virgin aleady termed) Upper Class from we cattle down below, so CX was a prime target with so much F/J. They dismissed it for a very-distinct CX reason, of "intelligent misuse": so a 747 in from an overnight sector would pop around the region, say 7 hour rotation, then off over the hills and far away. That's how for so long they had just 2 types in the fleet.
This model sat on CX/ED's desk awhile as a moral tale. What they wanted is what they helped to define and got: 747-400, then 777 in various iterations.