BetaTechnologies Alia250



"The newly announced aircraft has garnered interest from new and existing customers for medical transport, cargo delivery, and future passenger services. This includes Air New Zealand, which intends to order three eCTOLs with an option for 20 more."

I wonder what routes Air New Zealand could find this aircraft suitable for ? Sightseeing flights ?
 
Last edited:
Sounds like Beta is putting their eVTOL plans on the backburner.
 
More like seizing an opportunity. Having demonstrated the platform can do reasonably effective distances, someone likely asked the logical question of why wait on the VTOL effort? I suspect that they will continue to work on the eVTOL, but a positive cash flow makes investors happy.
 
But why should you buy such a cumbersome and compromised design with no real operational advantages and, in all certainties, a high price tag?
 
Here is my own awnser:


I did not fly the thing personally (however some Pipistrel design), but I have seen it operating from a very rough short field and it... Works (guy did scenary flight in Hungary).
Very fragile, very light, probably not comfortable with a pilot on your side reaching, I guess, well over 40, but, cheap, on time and with good performances.

So, I don't know what Beta is expecting here. Even fried chickens don't fly.
 
 
Unmanned cargo operations are great but look at the anaemic payload for such a big aircraft. Can it even bring-in a replacement battery in case one aircraft is stuck?
How did they say back then? Errare Humanum and bladibladabla...
 
I feel that the military knows these aircraft are pretty useless for them but are trying to keep a few of these companies alive with these contracts long enough for the technology to mature and hopefully become a commercial success. Sort of like a subsidy without admitting it's a subsidy, which is fine by me. Many aerospace projects in the past have gotten off the ground with govt assistance.
 
I'm not sure why anyone would go with a company named BetaTechnologies - is it supposed to be better that oh say AlphaTechnologies, like because it is beta than alpha?
 
Last edited:
Likely there is a strategic decision to maintain these smaller aerospace companies as nurseries of aerospace engineers and other high tech aviation capabilities. Since aerospace has been the gestational venue for a significant number of technologies that have crossed over to other uses, it seems a rational return on investment to me.
Besides, the gentrification of the mainstream aerospace companies with risk aversion fueled by nervous investors and bureaucrats alike, almost make this a necessity.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom