Reply to thread

Thanks, Mark, I know that site well.


Shed, I have to wonder if there might be some distortion in the image.  I checked airfoiltools.com and I can't find any common 1940s or earlier airfoils very close to that camber and thickness.  I did find the RAF 38 with 2.5% camber and 12.7% thickness which seems the most likely candidate.


[URL unfurl="true"]http://airfoiltools.com/airfoil/details?airfoil=raf38-il[/URL]


Back
Top Bottom