Atomic cannon submarine

Dilandu

I'm dissatisfied, which means, I exist.
Joined
30 May 2013
Messages
4,490
Reaction score
5,313
Website
fonzeppelin.livejournal.com
In early 1950s, the USN became concerned about the potential problem with nuclear delivery systems. The only available on hands was AJ Savage bomber, which could only be launched from the large carriers. The submarine-launched Regulus cruise missile was still in development, and it wasn't really suitable for all potential warfare situations, having surface launch and complicated radio guidance system. A shorter range weapon, more suitable for tactical use, was required; but available rockets and missiles weren't exactly reliable or capable enough.

So with a sucsessfull development of M65 atomic cannon by Army, the idea was born: to revive the old concept of "big gun submarine" (or "underwater monitor") in atomic age, to fire nuclear shells against the coastal targets.

1739091308534.png

The SS-435 USS "Unicorn", an incomplete Tench-class submarine, was chosen for the experiment. The hull of boat was lenghtened by installation of additional section just in front of the sail, and a 12-inch/50 Mark-8 cannon (the same as on Alaska-class cruisers) was installed on specially-designed carriage under the hydrodynamic blister. The gun was fixed in train, but could elevate up to 45 degrees, for which purpose the trunnions were moved backward and a special recesse made in newly-added section. The cannon muzzle was equipped with protection flap to prevent water from entering, and a high-pressure pneumatic system was installed to eject water from barrel after shot.

Normally, the gun could be reloaded only on surface. But since nuclear shells were costly, and a ranging shot was required to make sure the gun is aimed correctly, a single-reload pressurized magazine (with automatic rammer) was attached directly to the gun breech section, elevating and depressing with it. Normally, the gun was loaded with ranging shell (specially filled to provide a bright flash and a cloud of highly reflective dipoles on radar), while the atomic shell and powder charge was waiting in magazine. The ranging shot was fired first, then gun adjusted accordingly, and a nuclear shell was automatically loaded.

The cannon was supposed to fire a 15-kt nuclear shell - basically a W19 gun-type nuclear shell in slightly larger casting - up to 35 km. For the purposes of aiming, a special persicope with ranging radar was installed. The idea was, that the "atomic cannon submarine" could sneak close to enemy coastline at night, raise the barrel out of water, and quickly fire first ranging, then nuclear shells. It could also be used to provide high precision nuclear strikes in support of amphibious landing or commando raids. It was also hoped, that in future a long-range sub-caliber nuclear shells (based on W33 8-inch Army shell) could be developed to allow strikes up to 55 km range, and eventually the rocket-augmented shells with the 100 km range would became available.

The XS-435 USS "Unicorn" was commissioned in 1956, as an experimental weapon-testing submarine. While the concept of "underwater atomic cannon" was proven to be workable, the complexity and disadvantages of the system became rather obvious. No 12-inch nuclear shells were actually produced, and after a series of trials the program was eventually cancelled. The USS "Unicorn" was mothballed in 1959, and sold for scrap in 1964.
 
An interesting account.

USS Corsair is SS-435, USS Unicorn is SS-436 in The Fleet Submarine in the US Navy by John D Alden, USNI 1979.

SS-435 data from that book:
- 1 Mar 1945 Keel laying
- 3 May 1946 Launched
- 8 Nov 1946 Commisioned
- 1 Apr 1960 Renamed AGSS 1
- 1 Feb 1963 Stricken
- 8 Nov 1963 Scrapped

SS-436 data from that book:
- 21 Jun 1945 Keel laying
- 30 Jan 1946 Construction suspended
- 1 Aug 1946 Launched
- 16 Sep 1946 Delivered incomplete
- 9 Jun 1958 Stricken
- 7 Oct 1959 Scrapped

Any chance of a mix-up?
Where did you find the data?
 
Interesting concept - a kind of "Atomic Surcouf" - I'm talking about that (unfortunate) french submarine with 203 mm / 8 inch guns. (Atomic Surcouf - hell of a cool steampunk name ! Reminds me of that old shitty movie https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/atomik-circus-le-retour-de-james-bataille )

France could borrow a gun from the Richelieu class, and the british could do the same with Vanguard.

I can also see one very enthusiast engineer: Gerald Bull. He would literally jump the gun (ha ha ha) to sell his artillery range extension technology. IOTL he sold it to Armcor, South Africa, to improve their howitzers during those vicious bush wars against Angola. And later to Saddam, which, considering MOSSAD, was definitively a bad idea.
 
Last edited:
For tactical purpose I'd choose a LFS ship with nuke-rockets.

Gun types though are cool. Rather than an underwater gun, I'd drill a hole through the top and fit in a cargo hold. Inside I'd fit a mortar instead. Think of a Sturmtiger, underwater, belly bloated with steroids. It would hide in the littorals and spit RAP nuke shells to support marines (or covert strike on coastal targets).
 
Interesting concept - a kind of "Atomic Surcouf" - I'm talking about that (unfortunate) french submarine with 203 mm / 8 inch guns. (Atomic Surcouf, hell of a cool steampunk name !)
Thanks! Frankly, I just wanted to play with the idea of using large-caliber gun on submarine for nuclear delivery)
 
I will be honest, I had missed this is in the alt-history section. Fatigue-induced brain fog. That's where my question for sources came from :(
It was, however, a cue to grab Alden's book which had been sitting neglected on its shelf. Not all bad, then :)
Fun fact: as originally built, Tench-class submarines had a cigarette deck.
 
Last edited:
Well, both. The scrapping dates triggered me.
 
As I said in another thread, within the span of barely 10 years, nuclear vectors went from B-29 to Polaris submarines. Along the way were more than a dozen of alternatives, developped at the cost of $billions then brutally canned as obsoletes. Rinse, repeat, rinse, repeat.

I've drawn the list somewhere, for my alt-history. The amount of concepts and related waste is vordering insanity. Case in point: North American G-38 Navaho. One cruise missile among many, many others (Rascal, Snark, Matador, Regulus I...)

So I can really see @Dilandu concept joining the technological party and budget pornfest, as he said as some kind of alternative to Regulus II, itself an alternative to Polaris... just like Regulus I and the P6M "Seaplane Striking Force" or the A-3 Skywarrior or A-5 Vigilante... you can see where this is going.

Bottom line: in the 1950's, Uncle Sam military burned a colossal bonfire of dollars - looking for the ultimate nuclear delivery system (WS-125A nuclear airplane ! Nope, better: Vought SLAM, supersonic atomic cruise missile ! Hey - how about Orion, the spaceborne battleship ?)
 
Last edited:
So I can really see @Dilandu concept joining the party, as he said as some kind of alternative to Regulus, itself an alternative to Polaris... just like the P6M "seaplane striking force" or the A-5 Vigilante... you can see where this is going.
Yep) Well, my concept here is relatively cheap one, at least)
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom