AST.404 Contenders

rocketeer

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
23 November 2006
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
Looking for any information/thoughts on the RAF AST.404 Wessex and Puma replacement contest. Was it a lost opportunity ?Thoughts please?
 

Attachments

  • G-HAUL-a.jpg
    G-HAUL-a.jpg
    196.4 KB · Views: 332
I keep seeing this term AST.404 …
Seems to have been an upgrade program, though I am not sure.
What did the letters stand for?
 
Circa May 1984: Shorts MoU with Sikorsky to build components of the S-70 along with final assembly, flight testing and delivery if selected by RAF. Interestingly it was Sikorsky who made the approach, probably recognising the political advantage of assembly in NI. MoU ratified as an agreement at 1984 Farnborough air show.

Proposed RWR, IRCM and ECM seem to have been covered by separate bids by avionics companies.

Edit: further details from Avweek , 10 September 1984. The Shorts S-70As were to be RTM332-powered, estimated 75-125 units. Aircraft modifications, logs support and periodic maintenance also to be conducted by Shorts.
 

Attachments

  • Shorts_AvWeek_19850603_082.JPEG
    Shorts_AvWeek_19850603_082.JPEG
    394.2 KB · Views: 53
Last edited:
Interestingly it was Sikorsky who made the approach, probably recognising the political advantage of assembly in NI.
NFS* They were into everything that was going, dunno about 'political advantage' - see the chapter on ALARM in Typhoon to Typhoon and Tiger in The General Staff and The Helicopter.

Chris

*Normal For Shorts
 
Model of the Shorts-Sikorsky S-70 in RAF wraparound camouflage on display at the Ulster Aviation Society museum, Long Kesh. September 2024, 40 years after the proposal
 

Attachments

  • Shorts_Sikorsky_S-70_model.jpeg.jpg
    Shorts_Sikorsky_S-70_model.jpeg.jpg
    1.7 MB · Views: 47

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom