yes, these "Luft46" projects must be credible.....i seen some "new luft46 projects" never created by german's but just modeled by model company for busisness .....
I have a question though: looking at the drawings of the Arado E 555.7, shouldn't the engine in the middle be located under the fuselage, rather than over it with the other two?
To place the third engine under fuselage create reals problems for landing and take off......i choiced to place it with the two other.....for a good rcs too....
Are you an engineer? Why do you place the engines in this configuration. If one get's hit they can all explode or burn through. If you would split it into three podded engines it would be safer, and I guess aerodynamics wouldn't be much worse.
Well done !
Your rendering looks quite realistic and proves the efficiency of the camouflage scheme.
Perhaps a somewhat different background would be better ?
Well, gery, the question with regards to Horten designs and RCS isn't conclusively answered still yet,
though National Geographic invested a lot of money in their "answer"
(see http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,5851.0.html ).
And the use of irony sometimes is hard to recognise, so that a post can easily be misunderstood.
A clarification would be a good idea, I think.
the first object of Horten works..was the rcs reduction...not only with charcoal.but by the shape of this wings...that you can see on many modern drone of today like neuron,polecat..and i dont speack about B2 bomber......
As you can see on the picture...when i redraw the shape of Ar 555.7.i obtain a wing surface up to 192 M2...and that without wing tips...
As you can see again...the cantilever concept of the engine attach look clearly...a fantasy.....
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.