Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
Well the graph seems to show that the APG-65 has a 66% greater detection range than the APG-66, and i actually rounded down that to 60% just to be on the safe side imo, and i arrived at the figures i quoted of 64, 78 and 120nm respectively.But especially the latter figure seems incredulous to me, this thing has more range than Zaslon?! (however that 180-200 km figure was against a Tu-16 target, while the Tu-95 is literally a flying barn as far as RCS is concerned, i've read estimates of 100 sqm, so there is that) So probably the lower limit of 99nm or say 100nm for RWS as you quoted earlier is more realistic?
Well the graph seems to show that the APG-65 has a 66% greater detection range than the APG-66, and i actually rounded down that to 60% just to be on the safe side imo, and i arrived at the figures i quoted of 64, 78 and 120nm respectively.
But especially the latter figure seems incredulous to me, this thing has more range than Zaslon?! (however that 180-200 km figure was against a Tu-16 target, while the Tu-95 is literally a flying barn as far as RCS is concerned, i've read estimates of 100 sqm, so there is that)
So probably the lower limit of 99nm or say 100nm for RWS as you quoted earlier is more realistic?
