axlzed3301

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
16 March 2024
Messages
129
Reaction score
84
T34 Heavy Tank
Developed in 1945 as a modernization of the T30 heavy tank. The vehicle was equipped with the 120 mm T53 gun and the new Continental AV-1790 engine. Because of the decline in heavy tank development after the end of World War II, the T34 never entered service. The prototypes were used in field trials.
 

Attachments

  • T34Heavy_tank_in_Aberdeen_Proving_Ground_1947.jpg
    T34Heavy_tank_in_Aberdeen_Proving_Ground_1947.jpg
    145.3 KB · Views: 40
T54E2
developed in the early 1950s.
The T54 project was an early attempt on upgrading the US service tank fleet to 105mm gun armament. The T54E2 retained the M48 Patton's hull, but features a new turret mounting a hand-loaded 105mm T140 gun. Further technological advancements rendered it obsolete & the project was eliminated in favor of the new T95 medium tanks.
 

Attachments

  • OhDx7.png
    OhDx7.png
    615.4 KB · Views: 32
  • uIJ81yX.png
    uIJ81yX.png
    644 KB · Views: 27
  • T54E2.png
    T54E2.png
    487.3 KB · Views: 21
Last edited:
T49
was an attempt to upgun M41 Walker-Bulldog in order to stay relevant against more heavily armored tanks such as T-54 which appeared after the introduction of M41. To create T49, M41 was upgraded with a 90mm gun and a larger turret. This tank later served as the test bed for the 152mm M8E1 rifled gun/launcher. This tank was later adapted into the M551 Sheridan.
 

Attachments

  • the-prototype-light-tank-t49-by-the-us-army-v0-keo6bpcojtd81.jpg
    the-prototype-light-tank-t49-by-the-us-army-v0-keo6bpcojtd81.jpg
    40.2 KB · Views: 22
  • FB_IMG_1719850060348.jpg
    FB_IMG_1719850060348.jpg
    86.2 KB · Views: 22
T110
The original project of T110 was rejected by the military because of its excessive size (it wouldn't fit in the standard tunnel) and a poorly allocated commander tower, placed on the left. The company suggested another variant – the tower was placed at the center of the body, but, to solve the issue with fitting in the transmission, the driver was placed in the combat compartment. The latter was also ill-received by the military and the driver was returned to the original place. When endorsing the project with the Detroit tank arsenal, the drive layout was decided to be remade into rear-wheeled. Now it was necessary to remove the commander tower altogether to keep the size in check. In addition, according to the order, instead of the AV-1790 engine, they had to use an air-cooled AOI-1490 with the power of 700 HP and the same XTG-500 transmission. The 120-mm T123E1 gun was placed in a solid setting. Now there appeared problems with the power unit: it was out of reach. It was decided to make the engine “roll out” on the rails through a large manhole in the body’s rear. But a manhole like that drastically lowered the body’s rigidity.

After all these troubles, Chrysler came up with the fourth variant of the tank. Now the AOI1490 engine and XTG-510 transmission were placed in the rear compartment of the tank, in a classic manner. The length of the body increased, but it would solve most of the problems with the power unit. The 120-mm gun was placed solidly in the mask, providing horizontal firing angles of 15 degrees to the sides and inclination angles of +20 degrees and -10 degrees. Constructing the cannon’s mask proved problematic. It has to be 230mm thick and weigh just under two tons. The body’s forehead sheet and the cabin defense was equal to a 127-mm sheet angled at 60 degrees. The support weapons included a 7,62mm machinegun, that was paired with the cannon and a 12,7-mm machinegun located in the commander tower. The telescopic sight T156 was used for shooting. M16A1 periscopic sight was used as a back-up. The tank commander was able to use the T53 “OPTAR” rangefinder, installed on the top of the cabin. “OPTAR” was an optical rangefinder, used to evaluate the range covered by light impulses. Needless to say that this device, preceding the laser technology, wasn't very effective and suffered from light dazzles.

The driver was placed on the left side – near the gun. With such driver and gunner placement, the forehead armor had to be made with a lesser angle, so it was required to make it much thicker. This was the main downside of utilizing an immovable cabin instead of a tower.

The next logical step – replacing the cabin with a tower, that was possible while staying in the planned 50-ton limits of the machine. As a result, a classically composed tank was made, which were utilized many of the already existing units, were able to be built fairly quickly and cheaply. This tank became the fifth Chrysler project. The 120-mm gun was solidly fastened to the tower mask, having the standard 2,15-m epaulet like in the M103 heavy tank. The main difference from the standard composition became the placement of the gunner and the commander to the left of the gun. The team was reduced to four people – one of the loaders was excluded, replaced by a mechanical loader. The “OPTAR” T53 rangefinder was installed on the left side of the tower and could be used by both the gunner and the commander of the tank. Compared to the tower-less variant, the new T110 was providing better firing ability and quicker target hitting. The project had made it to the final stage – it was constructed and shown to the specialists of the Detroit arsenal in the form of a full-sized tank model. However, by that time, the modification project of the T43-T43E2 heavy tank, which eventually became the M103, was successfully accepted. That, together with the decision to concentrate the attention on lighter tanks, lead to the end of all work on the T110 project.
 

Attachments

  • Heavy_Tank_T110E5_1.jpg
    Heavy_Tank_T110E5_1.jpg
    12.5 KB · Views: 26
  • T110E5_2.jpg
    T110E5_2.jpg
    167.7 KB · Views: 28
AE(Associate Engineers, Inc)
Developed from 1951. The advantage of four-track vehicles was the capability to continue moving when two tracks were damaged, as well as to mount a large-diameter turret race ring. After studying the project, Associated Engineers Inc. was requested to develop a second variant with another track drive system, one drive n each side. It existed only in blueprints.
 

Attachments

  • Chrysler-Stage-I-Sketch-1.jpg
    Chrysler-Stage-I-Sketch-1.jpg
    79.2 KB · Views: 22
  • Chrysler-Stage-I-Sketch-2-780x480~01.jpg
    Chrysler-Stage-I-Sketch-2-780x480~01.jpg
    9 KB · Views: 17
  • Chrysler-Stage-I-Sketch-3-780x480.jpg
    Chrysler-Stage-I-Sketch-3-780x480.jpg
    11.5 KB · Views: 17
  • Chrysler-Stage-I-Concept-1024x437.jpg
    Chrysler-Stage-I-Concept-1024x437.jpg
    55.3 KB · Views: 17
Last edited:
T95E6
Some military analysts deemed the experimental tanks of the T95 series to be undergunned. In order to increase the tank's firepower, a new, heavier turret, designated T96, was to be mounted on the hull. This would allow replacement of the 105-mm gun with a 120-mm gun. However, development proved unsuccessful, and the project was canceled on July 7th, 1960. Only one dummy vehicle was built.
 

Attachments

  • T95e6.jpeg
    T95e6.jpeg
    42.1 KB · Views: 18
  • T95e6_(2).jpeg
    T95e6_(2).jpeg
    74.4 KB · Views: 17
Concept 1B
From the late 1960s to the early 1970s, under the program for developing a new main battle tank, various designs were considered. One of them was a variant known as Concept 1B with a low turret and manual loading of a 110 mm rifled gun with high ballistics. No metal prototype was produced.
 

Attachments

  • cd62c255-2839-43a1-9674-38cd0edfc322.jpeg
    cd62c255-2839-43a1-9674-38cd0edfc322.jpeg
    254.3 KB · Views: 19
T110E4
The T110E4 represents the 4th proposal for the T110 project. The T110E4 was Chrysler’s response to the problems in their T110E3 design(power pack issues). Note that the Chrysler T110E3 proposal was almost identical to the T110E4 save for being slightly shorter due to a worse powerpack, and is not to be confused with the Detroit T110E3. The T110E4 was planned with an AOI-1490 engine located in the rear of the hull along with the transmission. The rear section of the hull was to be covered with infrared shielding. The main weapon of the T110 series (the T123 120 mm gun, prototype to the M58) was to be mounted in a gimbal ring mount.This arrangement gave the T110E4 15 degrees of movement either left or right and -10 to +20 degrees of depression/elevation. The gun mantlet was to weight ~2 tons and would be ~230 mm thick without any curvature being taken into consideration. The rest of the T110E4′s hull was to be protected by 127 mm of armor sloped at 60 degrees(254 mm of effective armor). There was to be 4 crew members with the driver and gunner being located uncomfortably in the front of the vehicle wedged against 127 mm of armor. The cupola was to have a .30 caliber MG and was to use an OPTAR rangefinder using pulsed light.
 

Attachments

  • T110E4Chrysler+Detriot.png
    T110E4Chrysler+Detriot.png
    179.9 KB · Views: 17
  • T110E4Chrysler2.png
    T110E4Chrysler2.png
    836.1 KB · Views: 17
  • T110E4Chrysler1.5.png
    T110E4Chrysler1.5.png
    240.8 KB · Views: 16
M-V-Y
In June 1953, H.L. Yoh Company Inc. presented seven prototypes of a promising tank. One of them was named the M-V-Y. It suggested creating a vehicle with an unusual construction of the fighting compartment: the commander and the gunner being situated in the very narrow oscillating turret, and the loader in the hull. The shells were transferred from the hull to the turret through a narrow neck hole in the base of the turret. The suspension was supposed to have horizontal shock absorbers and a reserve internal track, that would allow to extract the vehicle from the battlefield if the main track was destroyed. The tank was equipped with the main cannon and five machine guns. The tank was never built.
 

Attachments

  • M-V-Y_Model.jpeg
    M-V-Y_Model.jpeg
    66.6 KB · Views: 19
  • M-V-Y_Side.jpeg
    M-V-Y_Side.jpeg
    53.6 KB · Views: 20
  • M-V-Y_Top.jpeg
    M-V-Y_Top.jpeg
    51.3 KB · Views: 19
  • Yoh_Track_Feature.jpeg
    Yoh_Track_Feature.jpeg
    162.4 KB · Views: 21

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom