Matej said:It depends on chemicals that you are using.
Back to trolley - it is pure concept, nothing that was actualy built. But in general, it resembles me some proposals from Piasecki.
Matej said:I am sure that in relatinon with this picture - it means with F-15, not any real hardware was built. And with other planes - I assume that howercraft trolley was never tested. But I will be happy corrected with some evidence.
LowObservable said:Someone was using chemicals, that's for damn sure.
Lockon said:Hi all,
Thanks for your info so far.
Sferrin thanks heaps for the wind tunnel test photo!........whats the web link?
If anyone has any more ideas or info then add it.
Lockon.
Lockon said:Hi all,
sferrin are you able to post the AIAA paper would be nice to have a read.
Thanks,
Lockon.
LowObservable said:Someone was using chemicals, that's for damn sure.
The Air Cushion Equipment Transporter (ACET) is designed as an air base survivability item, to transport vital heavy equipment (especially aircraft) across battle damaged terrain. This report presents the results of the first ACET program which consisted of the design, construction, and testing of a prototype vehicle. Based upon the design concept evolved for the AATS program, the ACET is essentially a lower performance derivative of the vehicle proposed for that program. Its construction follows closely the methods used in producing the LACV-30 and its cushion lift air system employs almost exclusively the hardware previously installed on the XC-8A aircraft used in the ACLS program. This report summarizes the evolution of the prototype vehicle and presents the results of the test program with the ACET equipped with a full-fingered skirt carrying on F101B aircraft to simulate realistic payloads.
Hmm. While the surface is not yet hard, or worse stillfull of debris, the hover-thingy's overpressure will be spraying stones and debris all around, won't it?but how long for the load-bearing surface to harden ?