Search results for query: Hypersonic

Thank you Austin! B) The article was helpful, especially the explanation of the difference between BGRV and HGV.

" "The new air vehicle effort will progress alongside an Air Force hypersonic weapons program."" All is said its for another air vehicle don't say hypersonic weapon. Read more: http://defensetech.org/2015/06/01/af-chief-scientist-air-force-working-on-new-hypersonic-air-vehicle/#ixzz3bwQpVLny...

Fraunhofer-Institut will show a hypersonic glider for testing to detect and intercept hypersonic weapons.

https://www.c4isrnet.com/battlefield-tech/hypersonics/2023/12/03/us-australia-eye-joint-hypersonics-experiments-in-2024/

Don't they use Helium in hypersonic wind tunnels to simulate hypersonic conditions whilst keeping the temperature at a manageable level?

So first glider re-entry vehicle, not first hypersonic weapon. Cuz technically first hypersonic weapon would be V-2 rocket.

Re: China hypersonic XK-2 waverider vehicle http://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/04/china-reveals-hypersonic-scramjet-developments-and-plans.html

Re: China hypersonic XK-2 waverider vehicle http://aviationweek.com/technology/china-takes-wraps-national-hypersonic-plan#comment-719861

Re: Japanese SST & hypersonic Hi, the NAL small hypersonic experimental aircraft. http://www.strange-mecha.com/aircraft/Experimental/J-EX.htm

1989 General Dynamics Hypersonic Cruise Missile studies reference: AIAA 1989-2353 OPTIMIZATION OF GEOMETRICALLY LIMITED HYPERSONIC AIR-BREATHING CRUISE MISSILES

Well the rumour had been that Britain wanted a stealthy subsonic FC/ASW variant to enter service around 2028 while France wanted a hypersonic variant to enter service a couple of years later. News today is Britain wants to rapidly develop its own Hypersonic weapon for 2030 (though they could be...

Nobody has said the US isn't working with Australia on a hypersonics project. Just that THAT one has nothing to do with the X-51, HyFly, Falcon, etc.

Scientific American - The Physics and Hype of Hypersonic Weapons https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-physics-and-hype-of-hypersonic-weapons/

Don’t believe the hype about hypersonics https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/military/hypersonic-missiles-are-being-hyped

USA's hypersonic programme could rile Russia and China https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/usas-hypersonic-programme-could-rile-russia-and-chi-429952/

The full size post X-24b hypersonic vehicles in the X-24C / FDL-7 / NHFRF (national hypersonic flight research facility) vein.

Complete Article - https://www.scribd.com/document/373233297/DOD-Flies-Experimental-Hypersonic-Payload

Flying hypersonic isn't something new. ICBM of decades back can fly hypersonically, too. What the x-51 is trying to accomplish is something completely different. That's the same reasons DARPA have their legs in many different hypersonic programs all at once. The comparison is as different as...

That's what I'm talking about: old skool hypersonics. And note: no air breathing malarkey besides the TF33s.