MiG-23's TP-23 and TP-26 IRST

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
27 December 2005
Messages
17,281
Reaction score
23,694
Found on hard drive, source unknown.
 

Attachments

  • TP-26-1.JPG
    TP-26-1.JPG
    62.9 KB · Views: 149
  • TP-26-2.JPG
    TP-26-2.JPG
    166.2 KB · Views: 140
Whatever material is used in those windows has to be pretty durable given the speed of The MiG-23, & while there are more optical options, now, my only thought was that the material might be similar to the one used on the seeker on the infrared version of The R-40, as it came out around the same time as said plane, iirc, but all that I have been able to find is this cryptic description that leads absolutely nowhere. Perhaps there's a mistranslation going on, here, but I really have no idea.

R-40T was equipped with thermal GSN T-40A1. The T-40A1 shroud is made of heat-resistant Kemnium and optoceramic-based satallic. The homing head took target designation within ±55° and captured the target before the launch of the missile. The T-40A1 uses signal processing principles that provide a high degree of protection against false thermal interferences. R-40TD and R-40TD-1 missiles are equipped with 35T1 SNS.

 
Sitall was a transparent material made in the USSR for optics:

if kemniya is a typo for kremniya then that's silicon.

Google gives three possible translations:

The T-40A1 fairing is made of heat-resistant sitall based on kemnium and optoceramics
The T-40A1 fairing is made of heat-resistant glass-ceramic glass and optoceramics.
The fairing of the T-40A1 is made of heat-resistant glass ceramic based on silicon and optoceramics.
 
For historic reference, my old Russian avionics website (2004) entries on TP-23 and TP-26

TP-23 / Spektr​

tp-23.jpg
TP-23 IRST on MiG-23​
Infra-red search and track system fitted to MiG-23M. TP-23 was also fitted to early Su-24 models. Search limits on the MiG-23 installation were +3°/-12° in elevation and +30°/-30° in azimuth. TP-23 could detect a Tu-16 at 30 km, and a MiG-23 at 20km, on a pursuit course.
TP-23-1 fitted to export MiG-23MF, MiG-23ML
TP-23M modernised version developed for Soviet MiG-23ML. Search range of TP-23M against a Tu-16 target was increased to 35-40km, and against a MiG-23 to 25km.

TP-26​

tp26.jpg
TP-26 IRST on MiG-23​
Infra-red radar search and track system fitted to MiG-23MLA/MLD. Range is said to be up to 85 km for a tail-on engagement with an afterburning bomber-sized target, or 60km non-afterburning (Piotr Butowski says 60km maximum). IRST has 5 operating modes depending on the distance to the target. The sensor is mounted under the nose, behind a triangular glass fairing. Some pilots have suggested it has better performance than the MiG-29's KOLS.

TP-26Sh1​

Infra-red search and track system fitted to MiG-25PD. Presumably based on the TP-26. Range given as 45km against a high altitude bomber (aspect unknown).
 
Last edited:
Checking my collection of scanned Soviet MiG-23 manuals, I autotranslated the TP-23 section from a MiG-23M maintenance manual. The only things I gleaned were:

  • The IRST was a monoblock removed in one piece for maintenance
  • TP-23 and TP-23-1 were both used on Soviet MiG-23M (likely TP-23-1 was just an improved version)
  • It's cooled by nitrogen
 
The TP-23 thermal direction finder and the ASP-23D optical sight, which were part of the MiG-23M weapon system, were also available on the previous modification, but since they were sufficiently tested on the MiG-23M, it makes sense to focus on this sighting equipment in relation to the "EM" modification. The TP-23 thermal direction finder was used to detect air targets by the IR radiation of their engines, allowing for covert target searches day and night. Unlike the radar, which identified a fighter by its radiation, the thermal direction finder used a completely passive operating principle. The thermal direction finder developed by NPO Geofizika was an optical-electronic device that provided a spatial overview and indicated the location of air targets with subsequent automatic tracking of one of them selected by the pilot. Its operating principle was similar to television sighting systems with a line-frame spatial overview in the IR spectrum. The search for objects was carried out by a sensitive photodetector made in the form of an elemental mosaic of an alloy of indium.antimonide. To increase the sensitivity of the photodetector, deep cooling with liquid nitrogen was used. The TP-23 window was made of optical ceramic plates that formed a characteristic faceted shape of the fairing under the nose of the aircraft. The selection of the "right" object, corresponding to the parameters of thermal radiation of the aircraft engine, was made by the coordinator using spectral and spatial-frequency signal processing, he also issued target designation by target coordinates.

Information on the presence and position of heat-emitting targets was displayed on the glass of the optical sight. A typical target of the Tu-16 type was detected from the rear hemisphere at a distance of at least 30-35 km. However, the TP-23 could be effectively used only under clear weather conditions - dense clouds, fog and precipitation absorbed thermal radiation, making its source barely noticeable to the device.

In addition to searching for targets, the thermal direction finder made it possible to point the radar antenna and issue target designation to the R-23T thermal missiles. It was possible to attack in a completely covert mode without turning on the radar, with aiming based on the TP-23 data. When the thermal direction finder and the radar worked together, the best conditions were created for overcoming the jamming environment - one of the systems was not susceptible to interference, be it radio countermeasures or heat traps, allowing you to select the most suitable operating mode of the search and aiming system for the attack.

TP-23 was installed on vehicles No. 0608 to No. 3508, starting with product No. 3509 it was replaced by the improved TP-23-1, which was distinguished by the design of the coordinator and cooling unit in the form of a monoblock. The thermal direction finder of the modernized design was tested on aircraft No. 3206.
1737463161293.png

The upgraded TP-23M thermal direction finder (product 26Sh1) had a one and a half times increased range of detection and automatic tracking of air targets, reaching 45 km when operating against targets such as a Tu-16 bomber against a clear sky. The TP-23M had higher accuracy characteristics of no worse than 20 angular minutes and an angular target autotracking speed of up to 6-8 deg/sec, which increased the effectiveness of passive location when working against maneuverable targets. Another advantage was improved protection against natural interference (sunlight, clouds, earth's surface), which made it possible, for example, to detect a target such as the same Tu-16 in the lower hemisphere at a distance of up to 20 km. The role of the thermal direction finder in the S-23ML system expanded: the TP-23M could be used both for space survey and target designation for thermal missiles, and for preparing for an attack using a radar sight, performing a covert approach to the target with the radar antenna pointed at the object with the subsequent activation of the Sapphire and instantaneous target acquisition. The capabilities of the TP-23M even exceeded expectations. The chief designer of the OKB G. A. Sedov reported at a meeting with the military: "In some cases, and not isolated ones, the new thermal direction finders detected and captured targets flying at a distance of 90 km. In conditions of deteriorated visibility, the range of the thermal direction finder on the MiG-23ML aircraft is three times greater than on the MiG-23M aircraft."
Afterburning targets could be detected not only from the rear hemisphere, but also when approaching from the front - when meeting a MiG-25 approaching on afterburner, the detection ranges reached 75 and even 120 km. Externally, the new thermal direction finder was distinguished by a modified fairing with a triangular nose made of optical ceramic plates. Since the usual name of the thermal direction finder TP-23M was given together with its designation as product 26Sh1, at someone's suggestion its incorrect name came into circulation - a contamination of two indexes in the form TP-26Sh1. Despite the absence of such a sample in nature, the fictitious code began to circulate on par with the real one, including in operational documentation - pilot instructions and technical descriptions.
Viktor Markovsky & Igor Prikhodchenko MiG-23 Fighter - To protect the skies of the Motherland, Eksmo, 2017
 
Last edited:
Sitall was a transparent material made in the USSR for optics:

if kemniya is a typo for kremniya then that's silicon.

Google gives three possible translations:

The T-40A1 fairing is made of heat-resistant sitall based on kemnium and optoceramics
The T-40A1 fairing is made of heat-resistant glass-ceramic glass and optoceramics.
The fairing of the T-40A1 is made of heat-resistant glass ceramic based on silicon and optoceramics.

I cannot thank you enough for this & everything else in this thread :). I did try Google translate & came back with the same results, but Sitall was the part about which I was absolutely clueless, as usual. Really interesting stuff, & it looks like an official study was commissioned in 1994 in order to test its ballistic properties for potential use as some kind of armor -


My only question, then, is why was this early faceted/triangular design & material not used, again, & especially now in their more modern irst systems? The necessary pieces are all there, but as always (or at least it feels that way), they're in the wrong place.

Oops, almost forgot - you can literally buy this stuff on eBay from someone in Ukraine, right now.

Unbelievable.
 
If we’re posting TP-23/26sh stuff…..

Its design is really genius. The “missile seeker upscaled in a ball” design of MiG-29/Su-27 is good for dogfighting. But this design using a sensor with 4 lenses mounted on a spinning drum around it to provide very fast azimuth scan, and a servo operated mirror to control vertical scanning gives very fast scanning using the raster scan method and long ranges.

Some photos and pages of MiG-25 manual describing range, radar ranging, and IFF use and other technical docs. MiG-29 is also a downgrade in this respect as the laser takes 8 seconds to try ranging 3 times before it switches to radar ranging, and does not provide you with IFF interrogation or atleast isn’t guaranteed.

The same drum/raster scan design is used In MiG-31 8TK IRST
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9178.jpeg
    IMG_9178.jpeg
    600.2 KB · Views: 6
  • IMG_9183.png
    IMG_9183.png
    247.5 KB · Views: 6
  • IMG_9182.png
    IMG_9182.png
    206.9 KB · Views: 6
  • IMG_9181.png
    IMG_9181.png
    288.7 KB · Views: 8
  • IMG_9180.png
    IMG_9180.png
    2.7 MB · Views: 9
  • IMG_9179.jpeg
    IMG_9179.jpeg
    350.3 KB · Views: 11
  • IMG_9176.png
    IMG_9176.png
    118.3 KB · Views: 10
  • IMG_9184.png
    IMG_9184.png
    1.5 MB · Views: 14
Yes TP-23 - 8TK in my mind are designed for long range BVR bomber detection and engagement while KOLS/OLS is more about close combat with fighters. Cheers for the drawings and photos.
 
Last edited:
Yea, you can especially tell the difference with TP-23 handling only 6-8 degrees/s movement, while KOLS in MiG-29 handles up to 30 degrees/s
 
If we’re posting TP-23/26sh stuff…..

Its design is really genius. The “missile seeker upscaled in a ball” design of MiG-29/Su-27 is good for dogfighting. But this design using a sensor with 4 lenses mounted on a spinning drum around it to provide very fast azimuth scan, and a servo operated mirror to control vertical scanning gives very fast scanning using the raster scan method and long ranges.

Some photos and pages of MiG-25 manual describing range, radar ranging, and IFF use and other technical docs. MiG-29 is also a downgrade in this respect as the laser takes 8 seconds to try ranging 3 times before it switches to radar ranging, and does not provide you with IFF interrogation or atleast isn’t guaranteed.

The same drum/raster scan design is used In MiG-31 8TK IRST

Another treasure trove of information. Thank you so much :).
 
MiG-29 is also a downgrade in this respect as the laser takes 8 seconds to try ranging 3 times before it switches to radar ranging, and does not provide you with IFF interrogation or atleast isn’t guaranteed.
Laser rangefinder is a LOT more accurate in ranging than the radar, so it makes sense to try first. Radar ranging is a fallback on the MiG-29.

TP-23 has to rely on the radar for ranging, it has no other choice.
 
Yes, the laser has a lot of accuracy, at the price of its 6.5 km range limit, which makes it very strong in the dogfight and HOBS situation it was designed for. Optimum front aspect range of locking for the IRST however is 12 km, I believe as low in 6-8 km in bad weather and look down.

Su-27 has a shorter range laser of 3 km, but I believe from reading it’s manual that it’s radar will instantaneously range any IRST lock if the Laser Designator is switched off.

MiG-29 has no switch to use IRST without the laser, so needs to try first.

And of course, whether this radar ranging with a ping every 4 seconds or so might set off enemy RWR is a matter of some debate.

I find it an interesting look into doctrine and technology that the TP-23 documents only ever mention rear aspect range with the seeming exception of supersonic afterburner MiG-25, the MiG-29 KOLS documentation only mentions front aspect range, and Su-27 is the only one to mention both front and rear aspect range.
 
The French R.530 and British Red Top AAMs both used cooled Indium Antimonide seekers in the 1960s but both had relatively poor front aspect range except against afterburning targets, just like TP-23M. I haven't yet understood why they are worse than AIM-9L or R-73 in this respect, I assume they're just less sensitive?
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom