malipa said:So for instance, you could form wingskin with electroactive polymer and then make the core a structure of mircolattice?
Could you please give me some more information?
carbyne is about two times stronger than graphene and carbon nanotubes, which until now were the strongest materials by some margin.
Firebee said:Metal foams?
http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0012/Banhart-0012.html
I can't imagine they'd be used for structural components. But maybe sound muffling, heat sinks/insulation, or radar absorbent material like the wing edge wedges seen on SR-71?
sferrin said:On the subject of materials though, something I've wondered for a long time is is it possible to calculate the theoretical highest melting point possible for a material? (At standard pressure.) You have things with relatively low melting points (say chlorine and sodium) that when combined have a much higher melting point than either parent material. So I wonder if there's something higher than carbon (yes, I know it doesn't melt at standard temps, it sublimes but you know what I mean).
Kryptid said:sferrin said:On the subject of materials though, something I've wondered for a long time is is it possible to calculate the theoretical highest melting point possible for a material? (At standard pressure.) You have things with relatively low melting points (say chlorine and sodium) that when combined have a much higher melting point than either parent material. So I wonder if there's something higher than carbon (yes, I know it doesn't melt at standard temps, it sublimes but you know what I mean).
Tantalum carbide (TaC), hafnium carbide (HfC), and tantalum hafnium carbide (Ta4HfC5) all have melting points above the sublimation temperature of carbon at standard conditions.
Firebee said:Metal foams?
http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0012/Banhart-0012.html
I can't imagine they'd be used for structural components. But maybe sound muffling, heat sinks/insulation, or radar absorbent material like the wing edge wedges seen on SR-71?
;D No kidding.bobbymike said:700 Terabytes in a single gram of DNA.
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/134672-harvard-cracks-dna-storage-crams-700-terabytes-of-data-into-a-single-gram
Smashes previous storage record by 1000 times![]()
My prediction - In my lifetime humans will create a handheld device able to store all the knowledge of mankind AND the average person will be dumber than ever ;D
Jemiba said:The term "digital dementia" already has found its way into our vocabulary
and that's actually justifiable.
Who still knows telephone numbers from memory ? Just use the memory
of your mobile. Common knowledge ? Year dates of important events ?
Just ask Google ! Finding your way just using a map ? Why, don't you have
GPS ? There was the car falling into a river, because the driver totally counted
on his navigation device. Unfortuantely behind the last curve, there wasn't a
bridge, but a ferry ... examples are galore.