list of aircraft captured by Luftwaffe in WWII with numbers

airman

airman

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
14 October 2007
Messages
1,569
Reaction score
462
Website
zeef.com
approximately 40 B-17s

* Avia B-534 biplane fighter captured in Czechoslovakia
* 246 +62( completed under occupation )Dewoitine D.520 fighter captured in France (from wikipedia)
* Caudron C.445 transport captured in France
* Caproni Ca.313 Italian bomber
* Morane-Saulnier MS-230 trainer captured in France
* Zlin 212 trainer captured in Czechoslovakia
* B-17 Flying Fortress captured US bomber
* Bloch M.B.175 bomber captured in France
* Avia B.71 bomber captured in Czechoslovakia
* BT-9 Captured US trainer
* Zlin XII captured Czechoslovakian trainer
(from wikipedia )
can anyone help me ? ???
 
The French medium bomber Lioré Leo 45:

120 were captured by the Luftwaffe and used mainly as transport and liason aircraft (+11 by the Italian Regia Aeronautica), according to:
http://batfredland.free.fr/L09-do217&leo451.htm

Units: 10/TG4; IV/TG4; KG700
 

Attachments

  • LeO451T.jpg
    LeO451T.jpg
    18.5 KB · Views: 121
Caproni 313 on Luftwaffe was a little number : in total was ordered 1494 Caproni 313 including 905 ordered by Luftwaffe !
 
That "BT-9" would be the NA-57 export version for the Armée de l'Air and Aeronavale.
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=665.0

Die Flugzeugführer - Ausbildung der Deutschen Luftwaffe 1935-1945, Band I/Band II adds:

Aero 101, Aero Sport S I, Avia Bk.534), Avia Fl.3, Bloch 200 (B.200), Bloch MB.151/MB.152, Caproni Ca.113, Caudron C.18, Curtiss Hawk 75A, Dewoitine D.520, Fiat CR.42, Fiat G.50, Fokker D.VII, Fokker G.1, Fokker F.IX, Letov S.328, Macchi MC.202/MC.205, Morane-Saulnier MS.406/410, North American NA-64, Potez 63, Praga E.39, Praga E.241, PZL-11, Raka Kl Ic, Raka Rk IIb, Ro.41, Tipsy S.2, Vought V-85-G

Also listed are NA-84 Harvards which seems improbable.

http://www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org/LRG/foreign.html adds:

PZL P-7a, PZL P-37B/PZL.43A, Potez 25 (Polish), PWS-26, RWD-8, Ilyushin Il-2, Gloster Gladiator, Supermarine Spitfire, Hawker Typhoon, Republic P-47D-5RE, Martin B-26B.

NB: this source also lists the NA-64 as being "French (license-built)"! ::)
 
This thread made me do some google searches for the rumored re-engined spitfire. Never knew whether it was real or faked. I just came across another forum that may be of use:
http://www.luftwaffe-experten.org/forums/index.php?showforum=23
 
Sorry airman, I'm late on this thread,
but you probably know Phil Butlers "War Prizes" ?
 

Attachments

  • warprizes.jpg
    warprizes.jpg
    24.5 KB · Views: 124
Perhaps this will help:


http://www.pen-and-sword.co.uk/?product_id=2037




Ed
 
Jemiba said:
Sorry airman, I'm late on this thread,
but you probably know Phil Butlers "War Prizes" ?
Click to expand...

Jemiba, seems like a great book! But I think you got confused here: the thread is NOT about Axis aircraft taken by the Allies after the war... it's about Allied aircraft CAPTURED by the Axis forces DURING the war!
 
Try this:

http://www.amazon.com/Strangers-Strange-Aircraft-German-during/dp/0897471989
 

Attachments

  • 39deeb6709a0e02c5e761110.L._SL500_AA240_.jpg
    39deeb6709a0e02c5e761110.L._SL500_AA240_.jpg
    16.2 KB · Views: 354
There was a bunch of English and American aircrafts also captured by the Regia Aeronautica during WWII, for sure there were Blenheim, Liberator and Lightining in the list with some more....
 
". it's about Allied aircraft CAPTURED by the Axis forces "

Oops, I beg your pardon ! I should at least always read, before typing, not to mention
thinking ... :-[

But "KG 200", or "Kampfgeschwader 200" seems to be a good keyword for a search.
 
aahem,There is lot more here ;D
 

Attachments

  • aa101.jpg
    aa101.jpg
    60.7 KB · Views: 28
  • aa52.jpg
    aa52.jpg
    18.1 KB · Views: 20
  • aa46.jpg
    aa46.jpg
    26.5 KB · Views: 20
  • aa41.jpg
    aa41.jpg
    20.3 KB · Views: 23
  • aa38.jpg
    aa38.jpg
    39.4 KB · Views: 105
  • aa37.jpg
    aa37.jpg
    47.2 KB · Views: 103
  • ne2.jpg
    ne2.jpg
    30.9 KB · Views: 103
  • aa60.jpg
    aa60.jpg
    43.9 KB · Views: 24
http://greyfalcon.us/

Hmmm... I see that the articles are against National Socialism, though some of the pictures would make you think otherwise, and while I haven't read everything, some of it do seem to be "out there". Some of the aircraft pictures must be speculative, even pure fiction. ::)

http://rareaircraf1.greyfalcon.us/index.html

Ahem... "Czechoslovakia" wasn't a member of the Axis, only The Slovak State, a client state of the Nazis ruled by Jozef Tiso, who got hanged for treason after the war. ::)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slovak_Republic_%281939%E2%80%931945%29

... and there I wasted an hour of my life. :(
 
Hammer Birchgrove said:
http://greyfalcon.us/
Click to expand...
:eek: Holy Napkinwaffe, Batman! They even have the Nazi Flying Saucers schtick! :D
emot-roflolmao.gif
 
"Be careful, that site has a lot of crap on it. "

I cannot give enough approval ! That site is exactly the kind of mixture, that tries to
turn rumours and half-truth into facts.
"And for power the Germans were years ahead in jet propulsion at both subsonic and supersonic speeds "
- Actually they were behind their schedule, which would have given a usable jet engine around 1946!
"Its secret was a rocket motor running on liquid nitrogen and alcohol" (about the A4/V2)
- Oh, Robert H. Goddard was already forgotten ?

And statements like "The great contribution of this Orthodox Jewish citizen, born Jan Hoch ..)
in conjunction with "When not gunning down a surrendering German mayor armed only with a white flag.."
makes me at least a little bit unsure about the intentions of the author !
 
Be careful, that site has a lot of crap on it.
Click to expand...

Of course, but the pictures Vietcong posted appear genuine...


cheers,
Robin.
 
Sure, but anyone who posts flying saucer crap obviously has poor quality control, so it's wise to question the provenance of the pictures if there is no other source.
 
Sure, but anyone who posts flying saucer crap obviously has poor quality control, so it's wise to question the provenance of the pictures if there is no other source.
Click to expand...

Understood, what I meant by 'genuine' is that the aircraft can be identified as real types,
which means that the pictures may have been published elsewhere, or indeed are
identifiable from records, etc.
Also, Vietcong is a new member here, he's obviously taken the time and effort to find
these images in order to contribute to this thread, and the forum in general, I just
don't want to see him discouraged when we dismiss his efforts, just because they are from
the 'greyfalcon' site.
Vietcong, good work on finding the images in your post, we'll need to research further to
verify if they're genuine. http:// greyfalcon.us is a dodgy site full of 'flying saucer' humbug,
and other wierd conspiracy theory stuff. It's best avoided.



cheers,
Robin.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom