Saunders-Roe P.187 : F.155T contender

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
31 May 2007
Messages
8,603
Reaction score
6,880
Hi!
https://www.flickr.com/photos/68286707@N00/15645403895

http://www.spaceuk.org/sr53/f155/f155.htm
"The design had some points of interest: a sliding nose was fitted, so that the pilot had a better view on landing, yet the aircraft would be aerodynamically smoother at high speeds. Elaborate arrangements were also made for enabling the 2 crew members to eject safely."

http://www.strange-mecha.com/aircraft/Concept/UK-SARO.htm
Saunders-Roe P.187 Rocket with Jet Intercepter Project
Length : 25.4m
Wing Span: 15.7m
Wing Area : 80.8 Square Meter
All-Up Weight : 43,999Kg
Engine :
De Havilland PS52 Gyron Turbojet (11,340Kg) X 2
Spectre Rocket (1,814Kg) X 4
Max Speed : 2,983Km/h (Mach 2.5)
Service Ceiling : 23,165m
Armament : Red Dean AAM X 2 or Blue Jay Mk.4 AAM X 2

Three side view drawing and model picture source : AIR ENTHUSIAST 61.
Radar operater window are small same as Sea vixen.
You can see accurate very complicated window shape in three side view plan view and model picture.
 

Attachments

  • Saro P.187.jpg
    Saro P.187.jpg
    171.4 KB · Views: 625
  • Saro P.187.jpg
    Saro P.187.jpg
    202.8 KB · Views: 594
  • model.jpg
    model.jpg
    316.5 KB · Views: 577
That was one hell of a monster interceptor. Pure brute power.
 
Archibald said:
That was one hell of a monster interceptor. Pure brute power.
Yes. ;) It's very hard for me to understand her full‐bosomed style exactly. ;D
I believe only Jozef-san can understand this aircraft by his 3D modeling.

http://beyondthesprues.com/Forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=ujed2r1qs2pljpj8isg6186935&topic=5284.300
 

Attachments

  • SARO P_187 - 2A small.jpg
    SARO P_187 - 2A small.jpg
    314.5 KB · Views: 447
  • SARO P_187 - 4A small.jpg
    SARO P_187 - 4A small.jpg
    398.6 KB · Views: 431
Hi!
I can see four Spectre Rocket nozzle in this model.
De Havilland PS52 Gyron Turbojet two exhaust nozzles are located under the rocket nozzles.
 

Attachments

  • Saunders-Roe_P_187-02.jpg
    Saunders-Roe_P_187-02.jpg
    89.2 KB · Views: 245
  • Saunders-Roe_P_187-05.png
    Saunders-Roe_P_187-05.png
    67 KB · Views: 267
Something of a familial resemblance to the 53 and 177, so, did SR have a problem with originality?
 
Something of a familial resemblance to the 53 and 177, so, did SR have a problem with originality?
Saunders-Roe came out of left field to fly the 53 and have the 177 essentially ready to start building before the axe dropped, but even then they were working overtime. They were a small firm with not much time for originality, and it's quite understandable that their response to an even more demanding specification should be to scale up directly as much as they could. Evidently they decided they had to go big or go home on the powerplant, because they make the leap from one Gyron Junior and one Spectre to two full-size Gyrons and FOUR Spectres.

Of course it meant that even the people who WANTED the F.155T thought this monster was too big and expensive.

No, the only design to ignore the clarification that the IR and radar missile loads were alternatives and NOT required to be carried simultaneously.
I seem to recall the phrase "impossible to carry simultaneously", but I'm still not sure if they mean technically impossible without reservation (drastically wrong, as even the Delta Dagger could show you), or whether they considered it impossible to meet the spec aerodynamically while carrying both 2 x IR (Red Top) and 2 x SARH (Red Hebe) missiles.
 

Attachments

  • 31d98168864b99432c73097edd6eb5bf.jpg
    31d98168864b99432c73097edd6eb5bf.jpg
    90.5 KB · Views: 84
Last edited:

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom