Boeing-Vertol Projects

hesham

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
26 May 2006
Messages
33,867
Reaction score
14,199
Hi,

http://archive.aviationweek.com/image/spread/19660725/41/2
 

Attachments

  • V-1.png
    V-1.png
    602.5 KB · Views: 868
  • V-2.png
    V-2.png
    575.4 KB · Views: 783
Hi,

here is a study from Vertol to a several VTOL airplane concepts in 1955,of course they
are not all belonged to Vertol,maybe in the drawing No.4 is for Bell,and also Aerodyne,
but I think it is proper to put them all here,many new designs,and I don't know what
the meaning of R-75,could be V.75 ?.

https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/147928.pdf
 

Attachments

  • 9.png
    9.png
    421.6 KB · Views: 265
  • 8.png
    8.png
    348.2 KB · Views: 269
  • 7.png
    7.png
    378.1 KB · Views: 101
  • 6.png
    6.png
    326.2 KB · Views: 87
  • 5.png
    5.png
    182.7 KB · Views: 80
  • 4.png
    4.png
    184 KB · Views: 78
  • 3.png
    3.png
    223.5 KB · Views: 522
  • 2.png
    2.png
    232.9 KB · Views: 554
  • 1.png
    1.png
    315.6 KB · Views: 711
hesham said:
here is a study from Vertol to a several VTOL airplane concepts in 1955,of course they
are not all belonged to Vertol,maybe in the drawing No.4 is for Bell,and also Aerodyne,
but I think it is proper to put them all here,many new designs,and I don't know what
the meaning of R-75,could be V.75 ?.

https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/147928.pdf
Click to expand...

Here is the report R-85,with some developments and anther shapes,maybe also they
meant V-85 ?.

https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/105750.pdf
 

Attachments

  • 10.png
    10.png
    133.9 KB · Views: 92
  • 9.png
    9.png
    108 KB · Views: 81
  • 8.png
    8.png
    114.8 KB · Views: 83
  • 7.png
    7.png
    96.6 KB · Views: 75
  • 6.png
    6.png
    158 KB · Views: 83
  • 5.png
    5.png
    160.3 KB · Views: 79
  • 4.png
    4.png
    130.7 KB · Views: 82
  • 3.png
    3.png
    152.1 KB · Views: 82
  • 2.png
    2.png
    145.9 KB · Views: 88
  • 1.png
    1.png
    145.9 KB · Views: 79
And,
 

Attachments

  • 12.png
    12.png
    103.7 KB · Views: 100
  • 11.png
    11.png
    114 KB · Views: 95
Hi,

I discovered that,the number after prefix "R" was the report's number,and was not Vertol
designation.

Here is a new report,with all data for them.

https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/147927.pdf
 

Attachments

  • 6.png
    6.png
    291.2 KB · Views: 75
  • 5.png
    5.png
    336.7 KB · Views: 71
  • 4.png
    4.png
    335.6 KB · Views: 69
  • 3.png
    3.png
    338.6 KB · Views: 75
  • 2.png
    2.png
    336.1 KB · Views: 75
  • 1.png
    1.png
    315.2 KB · Views: 93
Hi,

here is a Boeing-Vertol ASH (Advanced Scout Helicopter) Project.

https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a098155.pdf
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    139.1 KB · Views: 97
  • 2.png
    2.png
    122.2 KB · Views: 111
Hi,

here is amazing Boeing-Vertol Helicopter Projects,need collection of the pieces.

https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/663831.pdf
 

Attachments

  • 4-1.png
    4-1.png
    107.4 KB · Views: 104
  • 4-2.png
    4-2.png
    88.9 KB · Views: 94
  • 5-1.png
    5-1.png
    164.8 KB · Views: 92
  • 5-2.png
    5-2.png
    73.7 KB · Views: 93
  • 3-2.png
    3-2.png
    82.6 KB · Views: 98
  • 3-1.png
    3-1.png
    62.6 KB · Views: 95
  • 2-2.png
    2-2.png
    86.7 KB · Views: 94
  • 2-1.png
    2-1.png
    70.3 KB · Views: 91
  • 1-2.png
    1-2.png
    71.5 KB · Views: 96
  • 1-1.png
    1-1.png
    64.6 KB · Views: 86
And,
 

Attachments

  • 9-1.png
    9-1.png
    63.8 KB · Views: 75
  • 9-2.png
    9-2.png
    125.3 KB · Views: 70
  • 10-1.png
    10-1.png
    74.5 KB · Views: 66
  • 10-2.png
    10-2.png
    74.4 KB · Views: 67
  • 8-2.png
    8-2.png
    84.4 KB · Views: 63
  • 8-1.png
    8-1.png
    62.6 KB · Views: 64
  • 7-2.png
    7-2.png
    84.5 KB · Views: 63
  • 7-1.png
    7-1.png
    69.7 KB · Views: 66
  • 6-2.png
    6-2.png
    67.2 KB · Views: 55
  • 6-1.png
    6-1.png
    52.2 KB · Views: 54
And,
 

Attachments

  • 14-1.png
    14-1.png
    69.4 KB · Views: 52
  • 14-2.png
    14-2.png
    75.9 KB · Views: 59
  • 15-1.png
    15-1.png
    69.3 KB · Views: 57
  • 15-2.png
    15-2.png
    93.1 KB · Views: 53
  • 13-2.png
    13-2.png
    88.7 KB · Views: 50
  • 13-1.png
    13-1.png
    69.4 KB · Views: 52
  • 12-2.png
    12-2.png
    70.6 KB · Views: 49
  • 12-1.png
    12-1.png
    72.9 KB · Views: 52
  • 11-2.png
    11-2.png
    81.3 KB · Views: 50
  • 11-1.png
    11-1.png
    66.1 KB · Views: 57
Finally,
 

Attachments

  • 17-2.png
    17-2.png
    88.5 KB · Views: 59
  • 17-1.png
    17-1.png
    68.3 KB · Views: 65
  • 16-2.png
    16-2.png
    84.3 KB · Views: 65
  • 16-1.png
    16-1.png
    62.3 KB · Views: 72
Hi,

here is a medium helicopter,maybe based on Model-179,also who can collect the pieces.

https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a012236.pdf
 

Attachments

  • 5-2.png
    5-2.png
    104.8 KB · Views: 58
  • 5-1.png
    5-1.png
    127.8 KB · Views: 61
  • 4-2.png
    4-2.png
    124.2 KB · Views: 64
  • 4-1.png
    4-1.png
    114.2 KB · Views: 59
  • 3-2.png
    3-2.png
    118.7 KB · Views: 58
  • 3-1.png
    3-1.png
    91.8 KB · Views: 66
  • 2-2.png
    2-2.png
    111.4 KB · Views: 70
  • 2-1.png
    2-1.png
    59.7 KB · Views: 83
  • 1.png
    1.png
    94.5 KB · Views: 85
And,
 

Attachments

  • 6-1.png
    6-1.png
    96.4 KB · Views: 73
  • 6-2.png
    6-2.png
    92.9 KB · Views: 61
  • 7-1.png
    7-1.png
    104.9 KB · Views: 67
  • 7-2.png
    7-2.png
    112 KB · Views: 80
From AW 1965,

a strange designation to Boeing-Vertol,it was Model-102 ?,civil airliner helicopter,do I
read it right ?.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    296.6 KB · Views: 59
  • 2.png
    2.png
    41.8 KB · Views: 67
hesham said:
From AW 1965,

a strange designation to Boeing-Vertol,it was Model-102 ?,civil airliner helicopter,do I
read it right ?.
Click to expand...

Really not a good scan. The rest of the numbers seem to be similar to the Model 107 on the line below, so I suspect this is actually the BV-107-ii (written as 107-2), and is referring to the civilian airliner version of the BV-107/CH-46.
 
TomS said:
Really not a good scan. The rest of the numbers seem to be similar to the Model 107 on the line below, so I suspect this is actually the BV-107-ii (written as 107-2), and is referring to the civilian airliner version of the BV-107/CH-46.
Click to expand...

That's not right,it was number "2" ,please see again.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    40.8 KB · Views: 50
hesham said:
TomS said:
Really not a good scan. The rest of the numbers seem to be similar to the Model 107 on the line below, so I suspect this is actually the BV-107-ii (written as 107-2), and is referring to the civilian airliner version of the BV-107/CH-46.
Click to expand...

That's not right,it was number "2" ,please see again.
Click to expand...

I know that's how it looks. But it's a poor quality/low-resolution scan and I think the original might be damaged enough to make the 7 look like a 2.
 
TomS said:
I know that's how it looks. But it's a poor quality/low-resolution scan and I think the original might be damaged enough to make the 7 look like a 2.
Click to expand...

No designation allocated to it,so maybe it was V.102 ?.
 

Attachments

  • S.png
    S.png
    42.5 KB · Views: 59
OK, here is how I'm looking at this. The list is a capture from Aviation Week's annual list of "leading" aircraft by manufacturer. As such, this is not a list of unknown aircraft. But no other source I'm aware of mentions a V-102 or BV-102 from Boeing-Vertol. When I search for the specific title ""U.S. Rotary Wing Aircraft" in Google Image Search, I get multiple hits to thumbnail versions of this list (from several years) on the Aviation Week archive website and the look exactly like this list (colors vary year by year). However, what's interesting is that adding "107" to that search does narrow the results, while adding "102" returns no results. Which I think means that if you can access a high-res version of that list, it probably does not say 102. Unfortunately, I don't have a subscription to AW&ST to access the full archive and confirm that. Possibly someone who does can help resolve the question.
 
Last edited:
From, Airlifes_Helicopters_and_Rotorcraft,

the Model 63,71 & 105.

a.png b.png c.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From DTIC file AD0417836.
 

Attachments

  • 500.png
    500.png
    76.3 KB · Views: 116
  • 600.png
    600.png
    81.4 KB · Views: 44

Attachments

  • 900.png
    900.png
    1.1 MB · Views: 131

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom