Vought "Advanced Interceptor" studies (SAMI, ADLI, HSV)

Yes, AI-505K has the same weapons but bombbay is in fuselage. I didn't see these details for now
 

Attachments

  • AI-0505K air-to-ground missile.jpg
    AI-0505K air-to-ground missile.jpg
    307.6 KB · Views: 817
Bill S said:
Another aspect of the program that dd not get much attention in the earlier posts is the pitch for a Universal Hypersonic Test Vehicle UHTV and the Advanced Unmanned Interceptor variants of that concept.


Attached is a concept art slide of the UHTV, drawings of AUI-1, AUI-2 and some Time To Intercept information for even more advanced versions of the concept that I do not have drawings of AUI-3, AUI-3P/J or AUI-4P.


bill
Click to expand...


Compare this McDonnell-Douglas 1971 AMI study


http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/741745.pdf
 

Attachments

  • McDD-AMI.png
    McDD-AMI.png
    172.9 KB · Views: 636
Thanks Paul. Not a sexy design by any measure.
 
Remind me if this was posted before. I couldn't find it earlier in the thread
 

Attachments

  • 13692709_10204938161333149_68455271631952179_n.jpg
    13692709_10204938161333149_68455271631952179_n.jpg
    34.9 KB · Views: 2,173
I came across this unmarked drawing. After looking at the general arrangements
in this thread I am pretty sure this is a production breakdown of the AI-101.

bill
 

Attachments

  • AI-101-Production-Breakdown.jpg
    AI-101-Production-Breakdown.jpg
    30.2 KB · Views: 1,781
Good Day All!

Time to bring this thread back to the top....

Some additional drawings of various Vought projects - AI/AMI and HSV. Note the missile ejection idea for AI/AMI. Shades of Vigilante....

Enjoy the Day! Mark
 

Attachments

  • zSecoy Addvanced Programs AI Apr-21-71.jpg
    zSecoy Addvanced Programs AI Apr-21-71.jpg
    188.1 KB · Views: 816
  • zHSV Study No4B Dec-24-69.jpg
    zHSV Study No4B Dec-24-69.jpg
    183.3 KB · Views: 456
  • zHSV Study No1 Jan-17-69.jpg
    zHSV Study No1 Jan-17-69.jpg
    154.8 KB · Views: 436
  • zSecoy Advanced Programs - AI Jan-17-69.jpg
    zSecoy Advanced Programs - AI Jan-17-69.jpg
    137.2 KB · Views: 1,297
  • zSecoy Advanced Programs - AI Apr-21-71b.jpg
    zSecoy Advanced Programs - AI Apr-21-71b.jpg
    169.3 KB · Views: 1,373
  • zSecoy Advanced Programs - AI Apr-21-71a.jpg
    zSecoy Advanced Programs - AI Apr-21-71a.jpg
    159.5 KB · Views: 1,420
Yep, definite Vigilante vibe with the rearward missile deployment. But that has to be about the worst aeroacoustic environment imaginable for a missile to fly through. Sure feels like the work of a team with a lot of spare time on their hands.
 
Good Day All -

One I missed including with the other drawings....

Enjoy the Day! Mark
 

Attachments

  • zHSV Study No2 Dec-19-69.jpg
    zHSV Study No2 Dec-19-69.jpg
    148.5 KB · Views: 570
XP67_Moonbat said:
Remind me if this was posted before. I couldn't find it earlier in the thread
Click to expand...

Fairly sure that was a McDonnell-Douglas design. Quite possibly an ADLI though...
 
TomS said:
Yep, definite Vigilante vibe with the rearward missile deployment. But that has to be about the worst aeroacoustic environment imaginable for a missile to fly through. Sure feels like the work of a team with a lot of spare time on their hands.
Click to expand...

The missile appears to be the XAIM-97 Seekbat.
 
Speculating a little: Vought and Dassault teamed circa 1969 on varied projects. I can't help thinking those Vought looks a bit similar to Dassault Mach 3 projects dug out by Le Fana some years ago...
 
Good Day All -

From Vought material I had the opportunity to scan, the testbed, or one very similar to, AUI-1 in Bill's scan of an overhead in Reply #117. It appears that take off/landing are done inverted and high speed flight with the ramjet located on the "upper" surface. Quite smart...

Enjoy the Day! Mark
 

Attachments

  • zLTV L12-HSV-102 MA145-XAB Ramjet Test Vehicle Config 355 GA Aug-31-67.jpg
    zLTV L12-HSV-102 MA145-XAB Ramjet Test Vehicle Config 355 GA Aug-31-67.jpg
    388.6 KB · Views: 732
Mark Nankivil said:
Good Day All -

From Vought material I had the opportunity to scan, the testbed, or one very similar to, AUI-1 in Bill's scan of an overhead in Reply #117. It appears that take off/landing are done inverted and high speed flight with the ramjet located on the "upper" surface. Quite smart...

Enjoy the Day! Mark
Click to expand...

Looks like UHTV (1968):

index.php
 
According to the overhead in Bill's reply, they are one and the same...

Enjoy the Day! Mark
 
In looking though some photocopied material, a little more of the USAF connection came to light.

"While aircraft carrier launch and recovery suitability may favor single engined ADLI configurations, VAD studies have shown that a twin-engined configuration may achieve lighter TOGW. Further, land-based missions such as AMI need not be constrained to single-engined arrangements. Consequently, configuration AI-0505 was developed as an alternate to ADLI or a Small Advanced Manned Interceptor (SAMI) for land based USAF operations."

*VAD = Vought Aeronautics Division
 
c460 said:
This is a model of a LTV Mach 3 project with turbo-ramjet, exhibited at Le Bourget 1971, from Aviation Magazine 565.
I've searched for an appropriate thread to post this but I didn't find one.
Adrien
Click to expand...
LTV Mach 3 aircraft....? Can you elaborate on it? Am unable to find anything on it. Thanks., Kevin
 
KHambsch said:
c460 said:
This is a model of a LTV Mach 3 project with turbo-ramjet, exhibited at Le Bourget 1971, from Aviation Magazine 565.
I've searched for an appropriate thread to post this but I didn't find one.
Adrien
Click to expand...
LTV Mach 3 aircraft....? Can you elaborate on it? Am unable to find anything on it. Thanks., Kevin
Click to expand...
LTV did a variety of high speed (Mach 3) studies in the late 60s and early 70s under the HSV (High Speed Vehicle), AI (Advanced Interceptor), ADLI (Advanced Deck Launched Interceptor) and SAMI (Strategic Advanced Manned Interceptor) programs.

None went past the project stage.
 
overscan (PaulMM) said:
Cool model - where are the pics from and what makes you think its "Advanced Interceptor"
Click to expand...
They came from the article/pdf put out by the Air Force Materiel Command History Office earlier this year.
"A Look Back…Recoverable Rocket Boosters--A Future That Never Was..

..Most of what you will find in this “Look Back” came from the archives of the Air Force Materiel Command History Office, a research facility located at Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio."

They don't shout Interceptor at me but I'm not going to argue against Mr Landis:

"Several contractors submitted proposals under the Advanced Interceptor study from the U.S.
Air Force in the late 1960’s. This design proposed using scramjet engines as well as an internal payload bay
on the upper fuselage. Much of the information gathered from this study was applied to the hypersonic X-
24C designs. "
 
Dew said:
"Several contractors submitted proposals under the Advanced Interceptor study from the U.S.
Air Force in the late 1960’s. This design proposed using scramjet engines as well as an internal payload bay
on the upper fuselage.
Click to expand...


Unless it was designed to intercept a Goa'uld mothership or a Star Destroyer, that "missile" in the payload bay is a tad oversized. Much more likely to be a satellite launcher.
 
Indeed.
There is a strange (cut & paste?) effect/artefact going on in the first pic around the bay, not sure what that's about.
 
Dew said:
Indeed.
There is a strange (cut & paste?) effect/artefact going on in the first pic around the bay, not sure what that's about.
Click to expand...

Back in Ye Olde Pre Photoshop Days, it was not unknown for photos to be manipulated with *actual* cut and paste. the same photo could have multiple payloads swapped in and out by replacing a portion of the photo, like one of those old paper dolls.
 
voughtworks.blogspot.com

Voughtworks

Advanced Interceptor Vought Aeronautics Division heard of interest in hypersonic interceptor aircraft in March 1968. The team went to wo...
voughtworks.blogspot.com voughtworks.blogspot.com

Advanced Interceptor

Vought Aeronautics Division heard of interest in hypersonic interceptor aircraft in March 1968. The team went to work on an Advanced Interceptor (AI) study. Driven by Required Operational Capability (ROC) for Advanced Manned Interceptor, (LAO-3119 10 July 1968) from the USAF and a composite cycle engine evaluation study (Request for Proposal No. F33625-69-12-1453, Exhibit “A”. Statement of Work 4 October 1968) the team went to work.

VAD had already proposed a Universal Hypersonic Test Vehicle (UHTV) program earlier in the year. With a further definition of the mission for the AMI the team was able to apply their previous work on the UVHT to the new requirements.

Two of the goals for the project were to formulate aerodynamic design concepts and evaluation of candidate propulsion cycles. Five mission profiles were studies which created 13 different airplane configurations that filtered down to three refined base line configurations.

VAD viewed the mission definition of the AI as tenuous at best. The reason for that view were the different projected requirements of the USAF and SUN in purpose and complexity.

ZAP

The first mission was described as the ZAP. It consisted of the following:
  • 1. Outbound leg of acceleration to Mach 4.5 while climbing to cruise altitude and cruise out to a range of 500 NM.
  • 2. A 3g, power-off decelerating turn to Mach 3.0 at 80,000 ft.
  • 3. Followed by a constant altitude, constant Mach number turn at thrust limited normal load factor not to exceed 3g
  • 4. Engagement segment of 250 NM to inspect and attack the intercepted target.
  • 5. Finally, a cruise and descent to sea level with a twenty minute loiter capability at Mach 0.3.
ZORCH, SNAKE, ZIP and ESCORT were the names of the other operational mission profiles. Most notable differences were in the ZORCH and SNAKE that required a 1500 NM outbound leg.
Armament

The mission profiles assumed six missiles with no specifics on missile type current or projected. For the purposes of the project six missiles totaling 2000lbs and 1000lbs for a 30 mm internal gun and ammunition filled the bill. There was one missile from a McDonnell study called the “Raytheon 400”. The missile featured a compact arrangement which made it a good candidate for internal stowage.

The ZORCH and SNAKE profiles necessitated a larger aircraft due to the range; radar needs and second crew member to operate the radar. Designs included external conformal phased radar antennas but also permitted an interplanar array of 36 in diameter.

Crew Accommodations

There was a requirement for forward visibility equivalent to current fighters, which was a challenge with the heating challenges and high angles of attack for landing which led to tilting nose arrangements. The crew also had to be provided and escape capsule due to the high speeds. A closed-circuit video display was later proposed to eliminate the complexity of the tilting nose.

Engine Types

They engine types evaluated were fascinating in name as well as function: Supercharged Ejector Ramjet (SERJ), Plenum Burning Turbofan, Turbojet, Turboramjet, Rocket Augmented Turboramjet, Airturborocket, Turbofanramjet, Supersonic Inflow Turbofanramjet, Turboramjet-Stoichiometric Core, Afterburning Turbojet and finally Combination, Rocket, Ramjet, Turbofan,

Recommendations

In the end the VAD team developed two base line aircraft designs the A-105 and the A-505. The recommendation also included a design maximum speed of Mach 4.5 due to the constraints of fuel selection and construction materials available at the time. For an engine they stated that the Supercharged Ejector Ramjet (SERJ) and the Turbofanramjet (TFRJ) were the most promising.
Click to expand...
 

Attachments

  • Vought-AI-105-SAMI-Artist-Concept.jpg
    Vought-AI-105-SAMI-Artist-Concept.jpg
    52.8 KB · Views: 246
  • MissionProfile.jpg
    MissionProfile.jpg
    28 KB · Views: 251
  • AI-105-General-Arrangment.jpg
    AI-105-General-Arrangment.jpg
    37.2 KB · Views: 229
  • AI-505-General-Arrangment.jpg
    AI-505-General-Arrangment.jpg
    30.9 KB · Views: 239
  • AI-105K-General-Arrangment.jpg
    AI-105K-General-Arrangment.jpg
    78.3 KB · Views: 237
  • AI-101-Production-Breakdown.jpg
    AI-101-Production-Breakdown.jpg
    30.3 KB · Views: 300
Last edited:
This seems like the most appropriate topic for this information, from the NORAD/CONAD Historical Summary. January-June 1962

The second long range interceptor NORAD wanted was called the Advanced Manned Interceptor (AMI). The requirement was stated for vigorous
R&D to provide an AMI against the future manned bomber threat. The characteristics of the AMI were (1) ability to operate with a lesser degree
of close control, (2) a sophisticated fire control system (infrared capability out to 800 nm and radar of 500 om), (3) employ a 500 nm weapon (effective from ground up to 200 nm), (4) operate at a sustained speed of Mach 3, 4.5 dash at altitudes of 90,000 to 100,000 feet. NADOP 64-73 recornmended16 squadrons (UE of 18 aircraft) -- 13 squadrons for the U.S. and 3 for Canada -- during the latter period of the plan.
Click to expand...

 
Now that's what I call... ambitious requirements; if not completely blue-sky.
 
I think this interceptor may have found its way into a Filmation cartoon or two…once I remember in THE YOUNG SENTINELS (Space Sentinels)—late 70s-early 80’s
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom