- Joined
- 26 May 2006
- Messages
- 33,477
- Reaction score
- 13,523
CFE said:Except that it isn't designed to survive a re-entry from lunar return velocities, and it isn't outfitted for long-duration orbital flight. In fact, the design pictured has been superseded by an X-15-ish design for suborbital flights, and an HL-20 derived orbital vehicle.
flateric said:BOR-4 derived to say it correct.
Sierra Nevada Corporation (SNC) is partnering with NASA to advance the development of a commercial crew space transportation system as part of the Commercial Crew Development (CCDev) program. CCDEv is funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 which is an economic stimulus to aid private sector efforts to develop and demonstrate human spaceflight capabilities.
SNC was provided a $20,000,000 award on February 19th, 2010 to begin their CCDev program activities. SNC's development is based on the Dream Chaser spacecraft. SNC will be using this initial funding to further the development of the Dream Chaser craft and carry out risk reduction activities.
SNC will be partnering with several leading aerospace companies on this effort including Boeing, United Launch Alliance, and Draper Laboratories. SNC has four milestones that are tied to the CCDev funding:
Milestone 1 - Program Implementation Plan Review.
Milestone 2 - Manufacturing Readiness Review of Aeroshell Tooling.
Milestone 3 - Space Vehicle Propulsion Module Test Firings.
Milestone 4 - Dream Chaser Engineering Test Article Primary Structure Load Proof Testing.
In addition to these four milestones, SNC will be supporting these additional activities on this award:
a.) Requirements definition for Dream Chaser systems design & major subsystems.
b.) Build & Test Spacecraft Primary Structure.
c.) Integrated Loads Definition & CFD.
d.) Main Propulsion Motor Build & Test.
e.) RCS Thruster Prototype Build & Test.
f.) Develop Atmospheric and Orbital GN&C architecture.
g.) Flight Algorithms & Software Assurance Plan.
h.) TPS Trades.
i.) Atlas V Integration analysis.
j.) Wind Tunnel Model Build
The Sierra Nevada Corporation (SNC) Commercial Crew Development (CCDev) program continued to make excellent progress per plan during the 2nd quarter of 2010.
In the month of April, SNC traveled to NASA Langley for an Avionics summit. Team members from Boeing, Draper Laboratories, and Langley Research Center attended. The purpose of this summit was to finalize the trade study of the avionics architecture. Modifications to SNC's Louisville, CO facility were completed and the CCDev team moved into a dedicated office space. Newly hired engineering personnel came up to speed and began actively contributing to accomplishing the program objectives.
In the month of May, a preliminary design review for the Dream Chaser spacecraft structure was conducted at our Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) facility in Centennial, Colorado with team members from Straightflight and Adamworks attending.
In the month of June, a human rating Technical Interchange Meeting (TIM) was conducted at SNC's Louisville facility. This TIM included members from SNC's CCDev partners, NASA agencies, and industry representatives. Also in June, SNC successfully conducted and completed the Milestone 2 Manufacturing Readiness Review for the aeroshell tooling. This meeting was conducted and SNC's ISR facility with several NASA representatives in attendance. All aeroshell tooling including the lower and upper aeroshell tooling was completed in June. Fabrication for the pressure vessel and bulkhead tooling was also started in June.
Grey Havoc said:One big problem is, that what congressional support there is for Obama's current plans for NASA and commercial spaceflight is liable to evaporate come November.
Grey Havoc said:One big problem is, that what congressional support there is for Obama's current plans for NASA and commercial spaceflight is liable to evaporate come November.
The purpose of this summit was to finalize the trade study of the avionics architecture. Modifications to SNC's Louisville, CO facility were completed and the CCDev team moved into a dedicated office space. Newly hired engineering personnel came up to speed and began actively contributing to accomplishing the program objectives.
Grey Havoc said:I just wondering, wouldn't they save quite some time and resources on the initial prototype by using off the shelf NASA (esp. shuttle) avionics hardware with suitably modified/ customised software?
Orionblamblam said:Probably the only place to get "off the shelf" shuttle avionics would be museums and eBay. Probably best to buy stuff actually manufactured in this century.
Grey Havoc said:Orionblamblam said:Probably the only place to get "off the shelf" shuttle avionics would be museums and eBay. Probably best to buy stuff actually manufactured in this century.
But didn't NASA carry out a shuttle avionics modernisation programme not too long ago?
Byeman said:That was only the cockpit instruments and displays. MEDS was the name of the project and it used COTS flat panel displays.
The shuttle avionics is mid 70's technology, but the GPC's were upgraded to what the B-1B used and that was early 80's technology.
Grey Havoc said:Byeman said:That was only the cockpit instruments and displays. MEDS was the name of the project and it used COTS flat panel displays.
The shuttle avionics is mid 70's technology, but the GPC's were upgraded to what the B-1B used and that was early 80's technology.
I remember the cockpit interfaces side of things (being a major COTS disbeliever ) but I thought they also did some work on the three CPUs and some other elements?
Byeman said:There are 5 GPC's (general purpose computers)
Most guidance systems are "COTS". OSC has developed a system "MACH", that is used in all of its vehicles.
Grey Havoc said:Byeman said:There are 5 GPC's (general purpose computers)
Most guidance systems are "COTS". OSC has developed a system "MACH", that is used in all of its vehicles.
I thought most current space certified guidance systems were still custom built? As for the GPCs, I thought they had recently gone to a system of three primary CPUs (GPCs), but you're right, it's still four.
FutureSpaceTourist said:They're claiming DreamChaser will be ready for operations in 2014.
blackstar said:FutureSpaceTourist said:They're claiming DreamChaser will be ready for operations in 2014.
We can all start taking bets now.
blackstar said:FutureSpaceTourist said:They're claiming DreamChaser will be ready for operations in 2014.
We can all start taking bets now.
ADVANCEDBOY said:1. I don`t see how this program would be of any progress if compared to already existing programs that were cancelled. Designwise and engineeringwise it looks like a steady degress from what was being built in 70ies or even the cancelled x-33 RLV.
2. They need to design a solid carrier that can haul cargo and modules as well, not building tinier and tinier and tinier vehicles that rather remind a scale demonstrator than a real vehicle.
3. Sorry, I just don`t see solid engineering behind it.
Byeman said:2. there is no need for a winged vehicle to haul cargo and modules