Grumman FAAV

JAZZ

JAZZ

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
11 March 2006
Messages
302
Reaction score
271
It has been mentioned in a previous thread, however it should have a thread of its own in this section. I have no data on the size (it seems a small aircraft 10m in length) of this aircraft. I have attached a picture which was in flight International...but have no way of knowing which one.
 

Attachments

  • US- Grumman Future Attack Air Vehicle FAAV_1.jpg
    US- Grumman Future Attack Air Vehicle FAAV_1.jpg
    16.3 KB · Views: 595
Here's the flight international article you were talking about

1993 | 0811 | Flight Archive

DEFENCE USA invites UK into the ASTOVL dub BY SIMON ELLIOTT The US Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) has issued a draft memoran dum of understanding (MoU) to the UK Ministry of Defence
www.flightglobal.com

Here's a contractor report by NASA talking about lift fan aircraft (XV-5, X-14) and mentions the Grumman Model 755 (FAAV). Apparently Grumman built a simulator but the pilot found transitioning from flight to VTOL too cumbersome. Starts on page 11.


Wind tunnel report with some diagrams and badly scanned wind tunnel models.

 

Attachments

  • I_love_terrible_scans.jpg
    I_love_terrible_scans.jpg
    110.5 KB · Views: 446
  • g755.jpg
    g755.jpg
    98.2 KB · Views: 419
You'd think that modern control systems / automation could lower the pilot work load and make the transition relatively easy to carry out in a lift fan design (even if the transition itself was within a relatively marginal envelope).
 
Given that FAAV stood for Future Attack Air Vehicle, did Grumman's FAAV design have any provisions for armament?
 
overscan (PaulMM) said:
Nice pics - where are they from?
Click to expand...
First was from a random forum but is the same pic as post #2 (but better qual)
The others are from NASA LaRC picture archive I had from a while back but have only just got around to identifying

there is another but I can't remember where I got the file from, but it's a copy of a pic from the same report as the first :
 

Attachments

  • 887387-2.jpg
    887387-2.jpg
    32.8 KB · Views: 87
Last edited:
Great stuff, thank you. This has always been one of my favorite "mystery" Army projects for the Army's "Army After Next" era. I doubt it would have found its way into the Army inventory due to roles and mission concerns from USAF Inc., but it might have been a nice addition for the USMC who patiently wait for the Army to spend money on projects, then pick them up after the initial investment.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom