Western Artists' Concepts of Soviet aircraft during the Cold War

Cute remains of Cold War...Lot of placards 'This Is The Threat' issued by McDonnell Douglas in 80s. Note 'Su-19 Fencer' - obviously, hard attempt to imagine Su-24
 

Attachments

  • 5b8c_1.jpg
    5b8c_1.jpg
    17.9 KB · Views: 1,236
  • 15da_1.jpg
    15da_1.jpg
    17 KB · Views: 1,231
  • 40f5_1.jpg
    40f5_1.jpg
    17.1 KB · Views: 1,249
  • 362d_1.jpg
    362d_1.jpg
    17.8 KB · Views: 1,141
  • 1267_1.jpg
    1267_1.jpg
    17.4 KB · Views: 865
  • 3149_1.jpg
    3149_1.jpg
    17.8 KB · Views: 676
  • 4698_1.jpg
    4698_1.jpg
    17.3 KB · Views: 623
  • 7912_1.jpg
    7912_1.jpg
    16.6 KB · Views: 627
Whoa! Does that take LO back in time... I had a set of those things once, maybe still hiding in filing cabinet.
Sources were limited at the time and one had to make do... AvWeek occasionally got sight of intel materials of one kind or another, but reproduction and (I suspect) sketching were verboten and strange results (like original Backfire with tiny swing-wing panels) ensued. Flug Revue got some excellent pix of new-in-service types, acquired by Military Missions in East Germany, but the practice was highly unofficial, probably illegal and most likely not even tacitly sanctioned by high sheriffs.
Best bet was to treat everything as source material and analyse as far as possible, avoiding tendency to mirror-image...
Of course, some things turn out not to have been as fake as one might have thought... for instance, the "canard MiG-21 replacement" could have been Ye-8. And that tailless-delta Chinese fighter... suffice it to say that one saw a very interesting satellite image a year or so ago, that source would not release.
 
flateric said:
Cute remains of Cold War...Lot of placards 'This Is The Threat' issued by McDonnell Douglas in 80s. Note 'Su-19 Fencer' - obviously, hard attempt to imagine Su-24
Click to expand...

Woah, can you tell about the history behind those placards? An attempt to my McDD to say "This is the Threat, and the McDD F-15 Eagle is the answer?" ;)
 
Flateric, I'm blamed sure that those are from the 1970s rather than the 1980s based on where I remember seeing them. (Damn! Langley or the Lubyanka... so hard to remember after all those pentothol martinis.) But the idea was that the Soviet Union was modernizing and we wer not going to be looking at just piles of MiG-21s and Su-7s for ever.
 
I've got a set of those too, left over from the USAR unit that was at my airport until '96.
 
flateric said:
1984 way-of-thinking of modern Soviet a/c...An-124 was An-400 tnen. From Bill Gunston's Illustrated Guide to Modern Fighters...
Click to expand...

Actually, An-124 was Izdeliye 400, so it was the Antonov "400", just not the An-400.
 
overscan said:
Well, I found the original mention of "Fearless" in 1971. Perhaps it was a US "design study" of a possible Soviet response to the F-15 program made during the F-15 development?
Click to expand...

Flight comes to the rescue:

In this context the majority of Grumman briefings to the US Navy and to potential customers are based on the comparative performance of the Tomcat against four aircraft: the MiG-25 Foxbat, a hypothetical Soviet fighter codenamed Fearless and estimated to have flown last year, the Fishbed-J, and the F-4J Phantom. The Foxbat has from time to time hypnotised the American Administration with its Mach 3/80,000ft performance and is considered to represent the upper end of the adversaries which the F-14 may have to fight. Fearless is an extrapolation of Soviet technology thought to represent a new variable-geometry air-superiority fighter by Mikoyan, with a weight and speed of about 40,000 lb and Mach 2.6.
Click to expand...

 
From reply#21

Also from "Avión" but from March 1956 issue.

This is an hypotetical nuclear powered bomber
Click to expand...

I have found the origin of this drawing here

Retro-Futurismus: Eberhard Binder-Staßfurt - Gigant Atom

Futurismus,Retrofuturismus,Weltraumkunst,Klaus Bürgle,Theo Lässig,Kurt Röschl,Eberhard Binder,Hans und Botho von Römer,Günter Radtke,Helmuth Ellgaard,Heinz Hähnel,Adelhelm Dietzel,Fliegende Untertassen
www.retro-futurismus.de
 
Avion Revue (Spanish magazine) December 1983.

When An-124 was missidentified as An-400 in Western Press...at Avion Revue missidentified the missidentification = Antonov An-40
 

Attachments

  • An-40 missidentification.jpg
    An-40 missidentification.jpg
    73 KB · Views: 868
Hi,

I have some unknown drawings to me. Could anyone help me identify them, please?
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0005.jpg
    Escanear0005.jpg
    24.1 KB · Views: 660
  • Escanear0006.jpg
    Escanear0006.jpg
    16.8 KB · Views: 644
Justo Miranda said:
Hi,

I have some unknown drawings to me. Could anyone help me identify them, please?
Click to expand...

Hmm...Isn't that tailless delta in Buttler and Gordon's Soviet Fighter Projects?

Starviking
 
The overall configuration is similar to Antonov's "M" fighter design, and associated E-153 glider. A number of detail differences though.
 
Second tailless fighter is obviously someone's imagination from the Cold War era, but may be based on leaks on Antonov's OKB-153 'M' (Masha) fighter studies from late 40s - early 50s. Drawings are not a product of factory artist anyway - first of all, stars size are beyond any standarts, and cutaway is truly speculative - while a while was published here on 'M', no author has found anything like this in Antonov archives.

Photo shows E-153, unmotored flying testbed of 'M', which is closest thing to drawings, except lack of intakes, which glider just didn't need.
 

Attachments

  • an-i.jpg
    an-i.jpg
    29.6 KB · Views: 714
  • m-preliminary.jpg
    m-preliminary.jpg
    44 KB · Views: 699
  • m-final.jpg
    m-final.jpg
    42.7 KB · Views: 420
About soviet fighter : Last year I their own eye :eek: saw on one of the russian site this plane, as BICH-26 (1946).
Regrettably I have not saved their web address, and yesterday's (night), and present-day (matutinal) of the attempt nor to that have not brought... To my strong beliefs this is not reality. The Truth in answer Flateric. This is a collective image west artist early period of the cold war, for base plane Antonov's. in this instance, like other ROMBOIDS
fighter :

https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/3266

We shall Take to example one of like sources book D.MYHRA "Secret aircraft designs of the third reich " Shiffer M.H.(see please ris.1) If upper drawing this I-270 "Zh" OKB Mikoyan, or LL-1 Cybin ;D then lower drawing An "M".
The Drawing 2 one more scenes from the same source.
(! Very indistinctive for soviet artist incommensurate stars!)
Respectfully yours Anatoliy.
(Apologize.Machine translation)
 

Attachments

  • Рисунок1..jpg
    Рисунок1..jpg
    61.1 KB · Views: 501
  • Рисунок 2.jpg
    Рисунок 2.jpg
    25.8 KB · Views: 454
Last edited by a moderator:
In 'Air Force -the magazine of Air Power' March 1955
the straight winged aircraft is discribed as a rocket powered fighter
and designated Yak-21 !!! (by the author of the article)
Other sources - Le Moniteur de L'Aeronautique :May 1979 speaks about
the aircraft as the Type 11..

On the same pages in the Air Force magazine the Mig 'Romboid' ghost is also illustrated and
mention is made that it made test flight from Ramenskoye ....

Most probably these designs came from the fertile minds of some Western 'designers'
influenced by the Cold War paranoia.
 
Thanks everybody to help me classify these drawings in the right way.
I have obtained a copy of the Flugzeug article and found the drawing in the book by David Myhra.

I thought that the Russian airplane could be a development from the German Arado E-583 project (please see attached drawings).

I was not sure whether the twin Starfighter was a serious project as this type of double fuselage airplanes usually have a common tailplane that is more structurally efficient.
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0009.jpg
    Escanear0009.jpg
    72.7 KB · Views: 319
  • Escanear0008.jpg
    Escanear0008.jpg
    78.5 KB · Views: 315
Very interesting!
As old Aurora kits:
 

Attachments

  • Aur%20AL%20Mig-19.jpg
    Aur%20AL%20Mig-19.jpg
    30.5 KB · Views: 570
  • Aur%2048%20Mig-19%20S.jpg
    Aur%2048%20Mig-19%20S.jpg
    37.3 KB · Views: 552
  • Aurora%2066-69%20Yak-25%20Ex.jpg
    Aurora%2066-69%20Yak-25%20Ex.jpg
    134.3 KB · Views: 568
Not too bad, I think, if the only basis perhaps was a blurred planview photo from a satellite.
 
Hi,

also Sukhoi Su-1 and Su-2.
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1956/1956%20-%201040.html?search=vtol%20canberra%20aircraft
 

Attachments

  • Su-1 & Su-2.JPG
    Su-1 & Su-2.JPG
    42.4 KB · Views: 520
"Sukhoi Su-1 and Su-2"
Well, although in this case at least the manufacturer was identified correctly
and the designation was wisely marked as "Flight designation" .
 
Hughes Air Defence Systems - Soviet Stealth Bomber - "The Threat".
 

Attachments

  • HughesSovietStealth.jpg
    HughesSovietStealth.jpg
    135.2 KB · Views: 1,011
sferrin said:
That's a nice one.
Click to expand...

Ditto on that. Did you get this off the DVIC site or from elsewhere - and is there a higher-res version available?
 
It's from Hughes brochure
 
Looks like the wings would have corrugated skin panels - must be really stealthy ;D
 
Based on a late Junkers design, reminiscent of the latest stealthy version of
the Ju 52, which was intended for the invasion of New York by paratroopers.
And still today most people think, Hugo Junkers had used corrugated iron just
to achieve a better rigidity ! The attached photo is from a top secret exercise,
using a model in original scale. ;D
 

Attachments

  • New-York-Invasion_1944.JPG
    New-York-Invasion_1944.JPG
    38 KB · Views: 1,088
Bomber or fighter? I saw it in JDW many years ago & they said it was a stealth fighter.


overscan said:
Hughes Air Defence Systems - Soviet Stealth Bomber - "The Threat".
Click to expand...
 
Inspired by the SR-71 perhaps? There's more about it than the corrugated wing skin that reminds me of the Blackbird...
 
Jemiba said:
Based on a late Junkers design, reminiscent of the latest stealthy version of
the Ju 52, which was intended for the invasion of New York by paratroopers.
And still today most people think, Hugo Junkers had used corrugated iron just
to achieve a better rigidity ! The attached photo is from a top secret exercise,
using a model in original scale. ;D
Click to expand...

Someone's been playing Red Alert 2 too much :p
 
frank said:
Bomber or fighter? I saw it in JDW many years ago & they said it was a stealth fighter.


overscan said:
Hughes Air Defence Systems - Soviet Stealth Bomber - "The Threat".
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Actually it says "postulated stealth strike aircraft"
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom