Some interesting TzAGI WT models

flateric

ACCESS: USAP
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
1 April 2006
Messages
11,053
Reaction score
8,511
You surely have seen some of these screenshots at Paralay site - here they go in better quality and in enriched list.
All stuff goes from Russian RTR channel 2002 documentary entitled 'The Fifth Generation' so you must set timeframe in 2001-2002. Enjoy.

This is well-known Big-Eared something...YF-22ski? Very early PAK-FA? Hell, I dunno. Note F-14 style canopy windshield.
 

Attachments

  • Image_001.jpg
    Image_001.jpg
    63 KB · Views: 1,356
  • Image_011.jpg
    Image_011.jpg
    55.6 KB · Views: 604
  • Image_010.jpg
    Image_010.jpg
    63.8 KB · Views: 700
  • Image_008.jpg
    Image_008.jpg
    60.2 KB · Views: 864
  • Image_006.jpg
    Image_006.jpg
    50.6 KB · Views: 1,011
  • Image_005.jpg
    Image_005.jpg
    45.1 KB · Views: 1,077
  • Image_003.jpg
    Image_003.jpg
    48 KB · Views: 1,018
  • Image_002.jpg
    Image_002.jpg
    56.2 KB · Views: 1,438
Sukhoi S-22
 

Attachments

  • Image_030.jpg
    Image_030.jpg
    51.6 KB · Views: 216
  • Image_029.jpg
    Image_029.jpg
    46.6 KB · Views: 187
  • Image_028.jpg
    Image_028.jpg
    51.1 KB · Views: 185
  • Image_027.jpg
    Image_027.jpg
    55.4 KB · Views: 193
  • Image_026.jpg
    Image_026.jpg
    62.2 KB · Views: 410
  • Image_025.jpg
    Image_025.jpg
    60 KB · Views: 295
  • Image_024.jpg
    Image_024.jpg
    57 KB · Views: 450
Some unidentified models, apparently one with canards is MFI-related...something very strange with the wings of one of them (cruise missile? uav?)shown from the front side only...arch wing or supersonic biplane - call it as you like to.
 

Attachments

  • Image_039.jpg
    Image_039.jpg
    50.2 KB · Views: 770
  • Image_038.jpg
    Image_038.jpg
    49.1 KB · Views: 319
  • Image_037.jpg
    Image_037.jpg
    49.5 KB · Views: 737
  • Image_036.jpg
    Image_036.jpg
    37.7 KB · Views: 446
  • Image_032.jpg
    Image_032.jpg
    48.8 KB · Views: 361
  • Image_031.jpg
    Image_031.jpg
    49 KB · Views: 606
Spiritsky...
 

Attachments

  • Image_034.jpg
    Image_034.jpg
    60 KB · Views: 461
  • Image_033.jpg
    Image_033.jpg
    64.4 KB · Views: 762
  • Image_021.jpg
    Image_021.jpg
    47.6 KB · Views: 381
  • Image_020.jpg
    Image_020.jpg
    50.1 KB · Views: 435
  • Image_018.jpg
    Image_018.jpg
    46.2 KB · Views: 337
  • Image_017.jpg
    Image_017.jpg
    46.8 KB · Views: 622
  • Image_015.jpg
    Image_015.jpg
    47 KB · Views: 676
Isn't it that magic MIRV stuff that should overcome every ABM system in the world?
 

Attachments

  • Image_014.jpg
    Image_014.jpg
    39.6 KB · Views: 461
  • Image_013.jpg
    Image_013.jpg
    54.6 KB · Views: 443
  • Image_012.jpg
    Image_012.jpg
    39.9 KB · Views: 502
Isn't it that magic MIRV stuff that should overcome every ABM system in the world?

If it is maneuverable , then it should be called MARV (Maneuverable Reentry Vehicle).
 
Are you sure the Spiritsky isn't an Avengerski? ;)

It looks more like a twin engined aircraft with a tandem cockpit to me, but being a wind tunnel model, who really knows? Tell them to paint more detail on it on it next time! :D

Great pictures, though. It's interesting to see some of the variations of wind tunnel models they've tried.
 
Wow! Hugs from Ohio Flateric. I thoroughly enjoyed your outstanding caps.
 
Sundog said:
Are you sure the Spiritsky isn't an Avengerski? ;)

It looks more like a twin engined aircraft with a tandem cockpit to me, but being a wind tunnel model, who really knows?

On some reasons I'm not willing to disclose, I'm sure that it's not Avengersky.
Some logic can draw you to the same conclusion - look at the wing taper and include the fact that Soviet aircraft carriers were never supposed to perform strike operations at the land. They were designed as giant Air Defense Ships (ADS). Anyway, even if this role to be widened, navalized Frogfoots (and, in some not well-healed brains, Fencers) would perform as carrier's strike wing. Already then it was clear that we just have no money for dedicated Navy tactical aircraft program.
 
hs1216 said:
the model in image-36 looks like a f-18 with a mig product 33 style chin intake.

It sure does - an E-model to be exact!

Thanks flateric for posting those, the MARV is quite interesting in that it uses aerodynamic flaps for control, like US designs. Earlier Soviet era MARV tests were based on pressure-fed divert engines according to Mark Wade.
 
FYI, When I said Avengerski, I wasn't alluding to a Naval strike fighter, just a stealthy attack aircraft that is in the F-111 class as opposed to the B-2 class. Don't forget, a version of the A-12, with the exhausts on the top instead of the bottom was supposed to replace the F-111, just as a Navalized ATF was to replace the F-14.
 
I may be wrong, but it looks like Sukhoi SSBJ WT model...or Tuplev SSBJ...or not...both always were a double delta, while this one is triple delta
 

Attachments

  • Clipboard01.jpg
    Clipboard01.jpg
    273.4 KB · Views: 849
  • Clipboard02.jpg
    Clipboard02.jpg
    259.6 KB · Views: 723
  • Clipboard03.jpg
    Clipboard03.jpg
    256.6 KB · Views: 670
  • Clipboard04.jpg
    Clipboard04.jpg
    247.1 KB · Views: 628
Yildirim said:
the model in image-36 looks like a f-18 with a mig product 33 style chin intake.

It was called "Model 18'. There were also - surprise - Model 15 and Model 16)))
 
flateric said:
This is well-known Big-Eared something...YF-22ski? Very early PAK-FA? Hell, I dunno. Note F-14 style canopy windshield.

Some parts of this model like nose, canopy and tail section with empennage definitely have roots from so-called TsAGI 'thematic model' dubbed 'Minoga' (Lamprey), dated back in early 90s.
 
From Kryl'ya Rodine 2015-04/05,

here is unknwon Model for a canard fighter project,maybe with delta wing,who
can ID it ?.
 

Attachments

  • Unknown.png
    Unknown.png
    119.5 KB · Views: 101
Reminds me of this study by General Dynamics of a "MiG 2000" - a purely speculative project. I think we've seen a F-22 type model that was attributed to a reverse engineering study by TzAGI, so might this be something similar? What's the date of these images? It would be ironic if TzAGI saw the American study of a hypothetical Russian project and thought they could glean something about American thinking on advanced aircraft design.
 

Attachments

  • 800px-MIG-2000-Foto.jpg
    800px-MIG-2000-Foto.jpg
    64.7 KB · Views: 60
  • 20001.jpg
    20001.jpg
    23.4 KB · Views: 62
  • 20002.jpg
    20002.jpg
    174.7 KB · Views: 68
  • 20003.jpg
    20003.jpg
    70.9 KB · Views: 80
  • 20004.jpg
    20004.jpg
    78.3 KB · Views: 71
  • 20005.jpg
    20005.jpg
    64.2 KB · Views: 72
  • FR_87_MIG-2000-01s.jpg
    FR_87_MIG-2000-01s.jpg
    300.8 KB · Views: 80
  • FR_87_MIG-2000-02-03s.jpg
    FR_87_MIG-2000-02-03s.jpg
    487 KB · Views: 71

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom