Boeing 1977 Composite Structures Airplane study (Model 1044-019)

flateric

ACCESS: USAP
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
1 April 2006
Messages
11,136
Reaction score
8,866
Radius/equivalent range 3600 n.mi./6200 n.mi.
Payload 400.000 Ib
Field length 8.000 ft

Study evolved into Boeing Model 1044-019

Apart of military and civil cargo freighters, aircraft was studied as Air-Launched Strategic Missile platform.
"Various methods of deployment (aft and vertical) in addition to external carriage were studied. A deployment system was devised to allow the launching of Air Launched Cruise Missiles (ALCM's) from the baseline aircraft. The concept involves installation of a small launch door on each side of the fuselage through which the missiles are ejected. Rotary launchers similar to those used on the B-51/SRAM system are postulated. The rotary launchers are mounted on trucks and are circulated aft to the launching station. After ejecting the complement of eight missiles, the rotary launclier is removed and stored forward. Another rotary rack is moved to the launch platform and the launch sequence repeated. Figure [...] shows a configuration for the baseline design which will accommodate 18 rotary racks and 144 ALCM's."

Preliminary Design and Analysis of Large Advanced Military Transports
E.A. Barber and I. Rettie,
Boeing Military Airplane Development, Seattle, Wash.
L .Noggle,
Aeronautical Systems Div., Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio
 

Attachments

  • boe1977CSA-1.jpg
    boe1977CSA-1.jpg
    50.9 KB · Views: 1,241
  • boe1977CSA-2.jpg
    boe1977CSA-2.jpg
    197.5 KB · Views: 1,174
  • boe1977CSA-3.jpg
    boe1977CSA-3.jpg
    89.5 KB · Views: 1,112
  • boe1977CSA-4.jpg
    boe1977CSA-4.jpg
    158.7 KB · Views: 1,100
Hi,


and to complete the story,here is the Boeing Model 1044-13,14,17 & 18,also a more
info about this aircraft project.


http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a041234.pdf
 

Attachments

  • 3.png
    3.png
    144.7 KB · Views: 148
  • 2.png
    2.png
    332.1 KB · Views: 170
  • 1.png
    1.png
    200.7 KB · Views: 167
  • 1044-019.png
    1044-019.png
    203.3 KB · Views: 128
  • 1044-018.png
    1044-018.png
    194.8 KB · Views: 114
  • 1044-017.png
    1044-017.png
    174.5 KB · Views: 115
  • 1044-014.png
    1044-014.png
    196.7 KB · Views: 135
  • 1044-013.png
    1044-013.png
    179.3 KB · Views: 671
And;
 

Attachments

  • 10.png
    10.png
    164.2 KB · Views: 147
  • 9.png
    9.png
    153.9 KB · Views: 136
  • 8.png
    8.png
    205 KB · Views: 136
  • 7.png
    7.png
    172.8 KB · Views: 102
  • 6.png
    6.png
    160.8 KB · Views: 101
  • 5.png
    5.png
    204.8 KB · Views: 120
  • 4.png
    4.png
    250.6 KB · Views: 118
Hi,


here is the Boeing Model 1044-050,please note that; the drawing "3" is unknown concept ?.


http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a082941.pdf
 

Attachments

  • 5.png
    5.png
    57.8 KB · Views: 113
  • 4.png
    4.png
    36.2 KB · Views: 105
  • 3.png
    3.png
    34.5 KB · Views: 121
  • 2.png
    2.png
    43 KB · Views: 121
  • 1.png
    1.png
    118.3 KB · Views: 109
The CRAAF cargo pod is conceptually similar to that 747 outsize cargo pod.
 
ouroboros said:
The CRAAF cargo pod is conceptually similar to that 747 outsize cargo pod.


Yes Ouroboros,


but the concept is new for me.
 
That commercial version intrigues me, are we looking at another '757' or a '767'?
 
hesham said:
here is the Boeing Model 1044-050,please note that; the drawing "3" is unknown concept ?.

http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a082941.pdf

From the same source,

the Boeing Model 1044-050-200,and all Model 1044-505 variants.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    105.4 KB · Views: 86
  • 2.png
    2.png
    76.1 KB · Views: 79
  • 3.png
    3.png
    65.9 KB · Views: 58

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom