General Dynamics Convair Models 200 / 201 / 218 Sea Control Ship fighters

Mark Nankivil said:
for those who like the Model 200


It's hard to NOT like the Convair Model 200! Even without mentioning the F-35...
 
Hi,


I don't remember where I found this drawing to Convair sea control ship fighter,
it shows its weapon loading.
 

Attachments

  • Convair.JPG
    Convair.JPG
    42.5 KB · Views: 915
hesham said:
Hi,


I don't remember where I found this drawing to Convair sea control ship fighter,
it shows its weapon loading.

That's the Flight Simulator model which you can find at Razbam. I fly it every now and then in the sim (FSX).
 
Sundog said:
That's the Flight Simulator model which you can find at Razbam.

A more general question: How exact are those FS renderings, especially with regards
to weapons and payloads ? I just ask, because my son is playing a WW II simulation
in the moment and the aircraft are rendered really beautifully, but the choice of
weapons you have for each type often makes me laugh.
 
Jemiba said:
A more general question: How exact are those FS renderings, especially with regards
to weapons and payloads ? I just ask, because my son is playing a WW II simulation
in the moment and the aircraft are rendered really beautifully, but the choice of
weapons you have for each type often makes me laugh.
When I created the Convair 201 model I made an educated guess and added the wing and centerline pylons to it, because I felt the payload capability would otherwise be ludicrously small.
 
Thanks for this explanation ! You stayed on the plausible side, I think, the designers of the
mentioned computer games often not !
 
Robert Bradley’s “Convair Advanced Designs II” has lots of interesting new information and imagery about the Convair Model 200. Including an inboard profile of what appears to be an earlier design. This version looks like it has larger lift engines as their bay extends to the aft of the aircraft well past the leading edge of the wing. But what is most interesting about this configuration is it has two internal guns.

The artwork we had previously of the Model 200 shows a scabbed on gun pod (20mm M61 Vulcan) located either under the left fuselage or under the right nose (with undercarriage offset to the left). But this design appears to have two single barrel, revolver cannons located in the fuselage. One ABOVE each of the intake ducts just under the skin of the aircraft’s back. The muzzles of these guns are located about level with the wing’s leading edge above the intake ducts. Any muzzle gas would be taken away by the slipstream well before the intake and likewise muzzle flash would not disturb the pilot. But tracers whizzing past his head at chin level might! The ammunition is located in two boxes right behind the aft lift jet with the right box feeding the left gun and vice versa.

The guns look like Aden, Defa, M39 types but it’s hard to tell from the imagery. Anyway it’s a very unique gun configuration and well worth further investigation.
 
Cutaway Convair Model 200 Sea Control Fighter
The Convair Model 200 was proposed in June 1972 to respond to the US Navy request for designs for a fighter/attack aircraft for the Sea Control ships. The VTOL aircraft would have used a PW401 engine with an afterburning 3BSD plus twin Allison XJ99 lift engines located behind the cockpit for added vertical lift forward of the center of gravity to balance the aft nozzle thrust.



Sea Control Fighter Landings At Sea
To deal with ground environment generated by the combination of the afterburning rear nozzle and the high temperatures and pressures of the lift engines, ships from which the Sea Control Fighter operated would be equipped with special vertical landing areas with metal grates to allow the hot air flow to pass through.



Source: http://www.codeonemagazine.com/article.html?item_id=137
Picture Gallery: http://www.codeonemagazine.com/gallery_slideshow.html?gallery_id=175
 

Attachments

  • 2014_3BSN_01_Model_200_1267828237_4452.jpg
    2014_3BSN_01_Model_200_1267828237_4452.jpg
    130.7 KB · Views: 3,009
  • 2014_3BSN_06_Model_200_landing_1267828237_6470.jpg
    2014_3BSN_06_Model_200_landing_1267828237_6470.jpg
    58 KB · Views: 1,888
Does anyone have any info on what the radius of action of the Model 200 was expected to be? The operational concept was interceptor for the Sea Control Ship, so it probably needed to be able to take out Backfires and Bears at or beyond the range of the Kh-22 (AS-4).
 
Without a doubt the CV-201 is one of my favourite aircraft to fly in Strike Fighters 2
 

Attachments

  • Convair CV-201 9.JPG
    Convair CV-201 9.JPG
    82.9 KB · Views: 1,494
  • Convair CV-201 7.JPG
    Convair CV-201 7.JPG
    101.2 KB · Views: 1,429
  • Convair CV-201 4.JPG
    Convair CV-201 4.JPG
    180.9 KB · Views: 1,376
  • Convair CV-201 2 (2).JPG
    Convair CV-201 2 (2).JPG
    128.7 KB · Views: 776
Makes you wonder how things might have been different if they'd built this in place of the F/A-18A/D & AV-8B.
 
sferrin said:
Makes you wonder how things might have been different if they'd built this in place of the F/A-18A/D & AV-8B.

And the F-16 and maybe the Sea Harrier. A common lightweight fighter across most of the western air forces and navies. And if the Model 200 is a production airplane that means you have to have the F401 as a production jet so you have the F-14B. Which means more than Maverick doesn't have a TF30 flameout and gets in the flat spin that kills Goose but that it is has far better flight performance. F401 could also mean a major F-111 MLU in the 1980s?
 
Scanned from the Senate hearings in March 1975.
 

Attachments

  • 1975-0.PNG
    1975-0.PNG
    381.9 KB · Views: 782
  • 1975-2.PNG
    1975-2.PNG
    322.2 KB · Views: 738
  • 1975-1.PNG
    1975-1.PNG
    376.5 KB · Views: 813
  • 1975.PNG
    1975.PNG
    205.1 KB · Views: 765
Hi ,i have images of the airplane and i need more images & info of this project...

Thanks Gentlemans!
 
WhiteDemon said:
Hi ,i have images of the airplane and i need more images & info of this project...

Thanks Gentlemans!

There is plenty of info/pics on the Convair 200/201 projects on this forum (a highly documented and illustrated topic of its own), but you can't just start a new topic and ask randomly for information when you're interested in a certain type without checking what's already there beforehand... The first thing to do is use the Search engine and IF the subject hasn't already been tackled THEN you can start a topic (and from experience I can assure you that there aren't too many projects that haven't...).
 
WhiteDemon said:
Hi ,i have images of the airplane and i need more images & info of this project...

Sounds like you better get to work then eh? ::)
 
General Dynamics 218 from Aviation Week Archives. Conventional version designed to VFAX specifications.
 

Attachments

  • GDModel218.jpg
    GDModel218.jpg
    172.4 KB · Views: 546
 

Attachments

  • 20170628_Convair_200_SDASM_35588396075_e743750aa3_o.jpg
    20170628_Convair_200_SDASM_35588396075_e743750aa3_o.jpg
    190.7 KB · Views: 495
  • 20170628_Convair_200_SDASM_35420263862_0ab8f4170c_o.jpg
    20170628_Convair_200_SDASM_35420263862_0ab8f4170c_o.jpg
    205.3 KB · Views: 614
  • 20170628_Convair_200_SDASM_35201579550_42dc6fa6b9_o.jpg
    20170628_Convair_200_SDASM_35201579550_42dc6fa6b9_o.jpg
    221.4 KB · Views: 597
  • 20170628_Convair_200_SDASM_35458296371_f723508057_o.jpg
    20170628_Convair_200_SDASM_35458296371_f723508057_o.jpg
    249.1 KB · Views: 594
  • 20170628_Convair_200_SDASM_35588392185_944419a7ac_o.jpg
    20170628_Convair_200_SDASM_35588392185_944419a7ac_o.jpg
    161.6 KB · Views: 564
  • 20170628_Convair_200_SDASM_35549737626_a24661a6f3_o.jpg
    20170628_Convair_200_SDASM_35549737626_a24661a6f3_o.jpg
    277.4 KB · Views: 569
  • 20170628_Convair_200_SDASM_35201775610_ae657e7440_o.jpg
    20170628_Convair_200_SDASM_35201775610_ae657e7440_o.jpg
    121.4 KB · Views: 571
  • 20170628_Convair_200_SDASM_35588548835_156f1ef458_o.jpg
    20170628_Convair_200_SDASM_35588548835_156f1ef458_o.jpg
    277.8 KB · Views: 554
It's interesting to speculate how things might have turned out differently if they had chosen the Model 200 instead of the XFV-12. :p :'(
 
In the third painting there appears to be a CL-84 in the background on the flight deck. What are the VG-wing fighters flying overhead? They don't appear to be F-14s and I wondered if they represented another GD project?
 
Some variant of the Model 44, I would assume.
 
Model 44:
index.php


 
Last edited:
More pics

https://www.flickr.com/photos/sdasmarchives/
 

Attachments

  • 34747126414_8639ef2f65_o.jpg
    34747126414_8639ef2f65_o.jpg
    128.4 KB · Views: 465
  • 34747128664_20b335afc8_o.jpg
    34747128664_20b335afc8_o.jpg
    154.9 KB · Views: 706
  • 35201608390_ea9a518177_o.jpg
    35201608390_ea9a518177_o.jpg
    116.3 KB · Views: 473
  • 35201609980_77875c6ca9_o.jpg
    35201609980_77875c6ca9_o.jpg
    117.4 KB · Views: 440
  • 35588380805_e55abaf82b_o.jpg
    35588380805_e55abaf82b_o.jpg
    202.4 KB · Views: 423
  • 34779352063_922df7401a_o.jpg
    34779352063_922df7401a_o.jpg
    42.7 KB · Views: 388
  • 34779354033_6461bcff92_o.jpg
    34779354033_6461bcff92_o.jpg
    99.7 KB · Views: 352
  • 34779359153_f3c8c045d5_o.jpg
    34779359153_f3c8c045d5_o.jpg
    90.6 KB · Views: 456
  • 35458292151_ef23bff7d0_o.jpg
    35458292151_ef23bff7d0_o.jpg
    150.9 KB · Views: 538
  • 34779364613_7259a20a88_o.jpg
    34779364613_7259a20a88_o.jpg
    75.8 KB · Views: 447
More

https://www.flickr.com/photos/sdasmarchives/
 

Attachments

  • 34747113574_31dd27bcbb_o.jpg
    34747113574_31dd27bcbb_o.jpg
    76.9 KB · Views: 396
  • 35201609980_77875c6ca9_o.jpg
    35201609980_77875c6ca9_o.jpg
    117.4 KB · Views: 366
  • 34747112124_99e0a56385_o.jpg
    34747112124_99e0a56385_o.jpg
    68.3 KB · Views: 384
  • 35201590020_888ab644ba_o.jpg
    35201590020_888ab644ba_o.jpg
    69.2 KB · Views: 398
  • 34747115114_1934bc5c3b_o.jpg
    34747115114_1934bc5c3b_o.jpg
    112.3 KB · Views: 384
  • 35458275101_8cf827ffbc_o.jpg
    35458275101_8cf827ffbc_o.jpg
    91.4 KB · Views: 432
  • 34747118204_f281a3cc96_o.jpg
    34747118204_f281a3cc96_o.jpg
    64 KB · Views: 453
  • 35549589656_9aedd53b04_o.jpg
    35549589656_9aedd53b04_o.jpg
    86.2 KB · Views: 464
  • 35458278391_24db42b2d5_o.jpg
    35458278391_24db42b2d5_o.jpg
    117.5 KB · Views: 409
  • 35201602830_6cbd3c5fde_o.jpg
    35201602830_6cbd3c5fde_o.jpg
    141.8 KB · Views: 422
Last

https://www.flickr.com/photos/sdasmarchives/
 

Attachments

  • 35201591650_715154b495_o.jpg
    35201591650_715154b495_o.jpg
    102.3 KB · Views: 598
  • 34779324913_b074dbcbf0_o.jpg
    34779324913_b074dbcbf0_o.jpg
    180.9 KB · Views: 1,750
  • 34779328263_90d63c1267_o.jpg
    34779328263_90d63c1267_o.jpg
    156.8 KB · Views: 562
  • 34779330003_c1052bee30_o.jpg
    34779330003_c1052bee30_o.jpg
    155.9 KB · Views: 539
  • 34747104774_3567f0dda5_o.jpg
    34747104774_3567f0dda5_o.jpg
    155.9 KB · Views: 483
  • 35549566086_e11b96678a_o.jpg
    35549566086_e11b96678a_o.jpg
    94.3 KB · Views: 447
  • 35201588350_04fb6f3730_o.jpg
    35201588350_04fb6f3730_o.jpg
    67.9 KB · Views: 421

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom