- Joined
- 27 December 2005
- Messages
- 16,932
- Reaction score
- 21,821
robunos said:the bomb recessed into a drop tank, in turn recessed into the fuselage underside is interesting, like a Two Component Pod on a B-58 Hustler.
cheers,
Robin.
elmayerle said:I've always felt that replacing the bomb component of the two-component tank with an ECM pod would've been a very low-drag way of adding ECM to an operational F-107.
elmayerle said:I've always felt that replacing the bomb component of the two-component tank with an ECM pod would've been a very low-drag way of adding ECM to an operational F-107.
vulture said:Here is an image of the North American Aviation F-100B configuration; that later became the YF-107A.
Note the chin air intake position instead of dorsal location on the final configuration of the YF-107A. From the Boeing North American archives
sealordlawrence said:NAA seems to have really thought the aircraft through (perhaps over thought?)
sealordlawrence said:Well the F107 was basically a continuation of the F100 programme, albeit to the point that it was essentially a new aircraft (hence the new designation); TAC really seems to have wanted its light bomber (F-105).
circle-5 said:North American Aviation factory display model of the NA-212 / F-100A / F-100B / F-107A. Marked as F-107A -- you decide.
Wouldn’t the Configuration of the jet inlet compromise Situation Awareness
Yeah that would suck !literally.Wouldn’t the Configuration of the jet inlet compromise Situation Awareness
And ejection...