Klemm E.63/64
- Thread starter Maveric
- Start date
- Joined
- 31 May 2006
- Messages
- 655
- Reaction score
- 431
The E63 looks like a recconaisance aircarft. Is the E64 a fighter?
- Joined
- 11 March 2006
- Messages
- 8,633
- Reaction score
- 3,489
Both were carrier-borne recce a/c, basically of the same layout, the
E 63 was a parasol wing design, the E 64 an alternative bi-plane.
Estimated data for the E 63: max. speed 310 km/h, landing speed
85 km/h, range 1000 km, TOW 2800 kg, a Jumo 10A or a BMW 116
engine was envisaged.
And the article mentiones, that Hanns Klemm disliked bi-plane and
military aircraft ....
E 63 was a parasol wing design, the E 64 an alternative bi-plane.
Estimated data for the E 63: max. speed 310 km/h, landing speed
85 km/h, range 1000 km, TOW 2800 kg, a Jumo 10A or a BMW 116
engine was envisaged.
And the article mentiones, that Hanns Klemm disliked bi-plane and
military aircraft ....
Maveric
Fight for yor Right!
- Joined
- 14 January 2007
- Messages
- 2,180
- Reaction score
- 746
Yes, Jemiba is right. Basically both are the same, but the E.64 with a Span of 12,00m. Klemm E.63 has a Span of 14,00m.
L 10,90m; H 3,34m; Fl. 31,00m². Jumo 10A with 680HP/500kW and the BMW 116 with 700HP/515kW.
L 10,90m; H 3,34m; Fl. 31,00m². Jumo 10A with 680HP/500kW and the BMW 116 with 700HP/515kW.
- Joined
- 31 May 2006
- Messages
- 655
- Reaction score
- 431
What year were they designed in?
- Joined
- 31 May 2006
- Messages
- 655
- Reaction score
- 431
Thanks Maveric!
