Fairchild A-10 Projects

That is probably the case, but why did they skip from A-10A to A-10C when they started the recent upgrade program?
 
I know it's not definitive, but the USAF Museum does state that the N/AW demonstrator (tail number 73-1664) was re-designated as an A-10B when it was converted.

http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=3206
 
TomS said:
I know it's not definitive, but the USAF Museum does state that the N/AW demonstrator (tail number 73-1664) was re-designated as an A-10B when it was converted.
http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=3206
Click to expand...

The page seems to contradict itself:

Besides the A-10 N/AW, the USAF investigated the conversion of a limited number of A-10As into two-place trainer aircraft. These trainers were to be designated A-10B, but the program was canceled before any aircraft were modified.
Click to expand...

TypeNumber built/convertedRemarks
YA-10A2A-X CAS prototype
A-10A6Pre-production A-10
A-10A707Production A-10
N/AW A-101 (cv)Night/Adverse Weather prototype
YA-10B-Trainer proposal, canceled
Click to expand...

These data seem to clearly indicate that the N/AW A-10 was never reassigned as A-10B.
Yet later on, the page says:

73-1664 later converted to the A-10B Night/All Weather two-place A-10
Click to expand...
 
What! The US government never makes mistakes! ::)

You are obviously in error in your interpertation of the written explanation. ;D
 
I had the wrong lens on my camera (not much depth of field), but here's some pictures of the model.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9379.jpg
    IMG_9379.jpg
    95.3 KB · Views: 225
  • IMG_9380.jpg
    IMG_9380.jpg
    80.2 KB · Views: 234
  • IMG_9383.jpg
    IMG_9383.jpg
    89.2 KB · Views: 237
blackstar said:
I had the wrong lens on my camera (not much depth of field), but here's some pictures of the model.
Click to expand...

stop it down. Or if you dont have a way to hold the camera steady at slower f-stops, move backwards further away from the subject and refocus, it will increase the depth of field. Good enough pictures though, thanks for posting. ^_^

Is it just me or is the engine pylons wrong on the model? are they meant to be smoother?
 
The NAWS A-10 is currently at Edwards. It's been restored and I think is now on display, I have a few photos of it from the 2005 open house. Somewhere I have some photos of it from the early 90s as well, though those would need to be scanned.
 
I wasn't trying with the photos. I just grabbed my SLR with the 18mm lens and took a few shots. I have a macro/telephoto lens that would have been better. I was just being lazy.

As for the restored aircraft, there's a link to some photos posted earlier in this thread. However, it would be great to see whatever photos you have.

Although I'm not a Hog buff, it has always struck me that this was a very useful plane that has been badly treated by the USAF. It never got the upgrades it needed. The A-10C upgrade, limited as it is, should have been done 15 years ago. The NAW version is further proof of this (a capability the USAF could have used, but ignored). That said, there was a time in the early 1990s when the A-10 was scheduled for retirement, and yet it's still serving.
 
blackstar said:
Although I'm not a Hog buff, it has always struck me that this was a very useful plane that has been badly treated by the USAF. It never got the upgrades it needed. The A-10C upgrade, limited as it is, should have been done 15 years ago. The NAW version is further proof of this (a capability the USAF could have used, but ignored). That said, there was a time in the early 1990s when the A-10 was scheduled for retirement, and yet it's still serving.
Click to expand...

The Hog is an awesome aircraft, and though many find it ungainly, to me it's a thing of beauty! (at least for an aircraft!). I too believe that it was not given its full potential... not to mention the fact that it could have been put to good use in alternate missions and configurations (well, the OA-10 was a step in that direction).
 
Stargazer2006 said:
The Hog is an awesome aircraft, and though many find it ungainly, to me it's a thing of beauty! (at least for an aircraft!).
Click to expand...

I think it's one of those aircraft that falls into a unique category: awesomely ugly. Alternatively, ugly but practical. There are planes that are simply ugly and nobody could like. But then there are planes like the B-52 and the A-10 that wear their ugly like a badge of honor, as if they completely don't care because they have a job to do.
 
Kokoro said:
Is it just me or is the engine pylons wrong on the model? are they meant to be smoother?
Click to expand...

I think you're right. There should be a bit of a radius in the transition from the pylon. I think I have a shot somewhere to show this. If I can find it, I'll post it later.

Mike
 
Kokoro said:
Is it just me or is the engine pylons wrong on the model? are they meant to be smoother?
Click to expand...

These are my photographs - 175th TFG, Maryland Air National Guard A-10s in the hanger.

The first two show the pylon transition and I'm posting the other two because some of the warthog fans here might like them.

Mike
 

Attachments

  • a-10 detail 10.jpg
    a-10 detail 10.jpg
    357.9 KB · Views: 549
  • a-10 detail 9.jpg
    a-10 detail 9.jpg
    374.2 KB · Views: 542
  • a-10 detail 12.jpg
    a-10 detail 12.jpg
    343.1 KB · Views: 559
  • a-10 detail 1.jpg
    a-10 detail 1.jpg
    313.8 KB · Views: 603
The model has this, although it's not perfect. It has a little more curve at the rear of the pylon than the front. I'll take a picture to show it.
 
Stargazer2006 said:
blackstar said:
Although I'm not a Hog buff, it has always struck me that this was a very useful plane that has been badly treated by the USAF. It never got the upgrades it needed. The A-10C upgrade, limited as it is, should have been done 15 years ago. The NAW version is further proof of this (a capability the USAF could have used, but ignored). That said, there was a time in the early 1990s when the A-10 was scheduled for retirement, and yet it's still serving.
Click to expand...

The Hog is an awesome aircraft, and though many find it ungainly, to me it's a thing of beauty! (at least for an aircraft!). I too believe that it was not given its full potential... not to mention the fact that it could have been put to good use in alternate missions and configurations (well, the OA-10 was a step in that direction).
Click to expand...

A-10 is by far the best loved aircraft of the US Army. So well loved that after the Air Force planned on putting all of them in the boneyard in preference to fast jets, the Army seriously considered pulling them out and using them. This was a serious political concern for the Air Force. I used to have opportunity to work with them as a helo driver. Those guys had a very different mind set from their brother zoomies.
 
blackstar said:
The model has this, although it's not perfect. It has a little more curve at the rear of the pylon than the front. I'll take a picture to show it.
Click to expand...

I believe Kokoro was asking about the transition from the pylon to engine housing along the broad surface, not the front and back edges.

Please do post a detail shot of the engines on the model as I'd like to get a better look at that for myself.

Mike
 

Attachments

  • republic460A-10AN-AWcockpitconst.jpg
    republic460A-10AN-AWcockpitconst.jpg
    143.3 KB · Views: 219
  • republic459A-10AN-AWcockpitassy.jpg
    republic459A-10AN-AWcockpitassy.jpg
    134.7 KB · Views: 239
  • republic457A-10AN-AWfuselageconst.jpg
    republic457A-10AN-AWfuselageconst.jpg
    136.2 KB · Views: 337
  • republic461A-10AN-AWcombatdwg21975.jpg
    republic461A-10AN-AWcombatdwg21975.jpg
    122.8 KB · Views: 369
  • republic458A-10A2seatN-AWdwg91978.jpg
    republic458A-10A2seatN-AWdwg91978.jpg
    69 KB · Views: 384
  • republic456A-10nightfighterdwg1978.jpg
    republic456A-10nightfighterdwg1978.jpg
    79.3 KB · Views: 345
I was at Edwards AFB on business a week and a half ago and photographed this at the museum.
 

Attachments

  • DFRC 343.jpg
    DFRC 343.jpg
    43.6 KB · Views: 196
  • DFRC 342.jpg
    DFRC 342.jpg
    46.2 KB · Views: 166
  • DFRC 341.jpg
    DFRC 341.jpg
    42.2 KB · Views: 144
  • DFRC 340.jpg
    DFRC 340.jpg
    40.3 KB · Views: 148
  • DFRC 226.jpg
    DFRC 226.jpg
    50.9 KB · Views: 136
  • DFRC 225.jpg
    DFRC 225.jpg
    48.4 KB · Views: 148
  • DFRC 223.jpg
    DFRC 223.jpg
    44.6 KB · Views: 146
I read in a fairly recent issue of AW&ST that an optionally manned version of the A-10 is supposed to start flying/testing circa 2014. Supposedly to allow JTACs or combat controllers on the ground to control the targeting and release of weapons from the remotely pilot A-10 for quicker support/weapon release times. Has anyone heard anymore about this?
 
John21 said:
I read in a fairly recent issue of AW&ST that an optionally manned version of the A-10 is supposed to start flying/testing circa 2014. Supposedly to allow JTACs or combat controllers on the ground to control the targeting and release of weapons from the remotely pilot A-10 for quicker support/weapon release times. Has anyone heard anymore about this?
Click to expand...

Yeah. That's the UA-10D. See attachments below!

EDIT: profiles drawn by Greg, a.k.a. GTX on this forum.
 

Attachments

  • UA10.jpg
    UA10.jpg
    144.6 KB · Views: 1,486
  • A-10UCAV (UA-10D).jpg
    A-10UCAV (UA-10D).jpg
    68.3 KB · Views: 1,494
In my opinion I doubt that it will enter the operational service. Optionally manned derivate from the existing plane is much harder modification than it appears to be and a very costly one. Who wants to know why, I suggest to read the analysis of the F-16 DR-IUCAV proposal.
 
Stargazer2006 said:
Yeah. That's the UA-10D. See attachments below!
Click to expand...

If they did this, they would not remove the cockpit. There's really not much point to doing that--you save weight, but it changes the drag, center of gravity, etc., and that changes the flying characteristics of the plane. So then you have to re-calculate all that stuff and figure out how the plane now flies. Plus, why not leave in the cockpit so that a pilot can still fly it if necessary?
 
The main idea is to use the modules that can be changed in the dozens of minutes. Something like unmanned F-35 proposal. But as you correctly pointed out and how I said before, it is very costly and complicated solution.

Other issue is that you need to have the latest avionics and guidance and a lot of other equipment to transform it to the RPV. Its not like the MQ-9, that is from the beginning optimised as the UAV. When they were studied the effectivity of transforming the old F-16s into the DR IUCAVs, they found out, that they can use only the latest Block 50 and newer series to do so, or pay for all that extra upgrade on the older airframes. Its simply budget killer.

Of course somebody did try to do it simple way, but I think it is hardly USAF standard :) http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,756.msg16813.html#msg16813
 
About 10 years ago I was asked to do a one-off model A-10 in Aero-Union Fire bomber marking for the company here in Chico, CA, seems there was a plan afoot to get the things set up for fire retardant work...I still have the paint scheme drawing in here somewhere..it was a nice looking model, nothing came of it of course, but it would be impressive to see the Hog dousing fires around here...

Paul
 
madgepetto said:
About 10 years ago I was asked to do a one-off model A-10 in Aero-Union Fire bomber marking for the company here in Chico, CA, seems there was a plan afoot to get the things set up for fire retardant work...I still have the paint scheme drawing in here somewhere..it was a nice looking model, nothing came of it of course, but it would be impressive to see the Hog dousing fires around here...
Click to expand...

Any pictures?

I think I read about this, so it got reported. Considering that the AH-1 Cobra is used as a fire spotter, and that the A-10 has good low-speed, low-altitude handling characteristics, it's not a totally nutty idea. But it would have been expensive to maintain.
 
madgepetto said:
About 10 years ago I was asked to do a one-off model A-10 in Aero-Union Fire bomber marking for the company here in Chico, CA, seems there was a plan afoot to get the things set up for fire retardant work...I still have the paint scheme drawing in here somewhere..it was a nice looking model, nothing came of it of course, but it would be impressive to see the Hog dousing fires around here...

Paul
Click to expand...

Sounds very interesting. Like blackstar, I would be very interested in seeing any pictures or artwork you might have of this concept.
 
I will try to dig out the rendering they gave me and scan it.Having watched the DC-10 fire-bomber making runs directly over my home in 2008 , I have to say it would be amazing to see a flight of Hogs doing spot-fire work.The P-2's,P-3's and Turbo-Stoofs are still keeping us safe here, but they will eventually have to be replaced.
More as soon as I find it...
P
 
Utility Attack-10? Is this another distorted USAF designation?



Stargazer2006 said:
John21 said:
I read in a fairly recent issue of AW&ST that an optionally manned version of the A-10 is supposed to start flying/testing circa 2014. Supposedly to allow JTACs or combat controllers on the ground to control the targeting and release of weapons from the remotely pilot A-10 for quicker support/weapon release times. Has anyone heard anymore about this?
Click to expand...

Yeah. That's the UA-10D. See attachments below!
Click to expand...
 
frank said:
Utility Attack-10? Is this another distorted USAF designation?
Click to expand...

Now THAT's an interesting remark. I had never considered the question before... Perhaps it's just a typo for QA-10D... because if it's not, it could only mean one thing, and that's the "U for Utility" class being dropped and reallocated to create a "U for Unmanned" class. At least that's the only explanation I can come up with. We need to see more mentions of the true designation to be sure. For now let's assume it WAS a typo...
 
Model of Fairchild Republic A-10B manufactured by Precise found on eBay.

URL:
http://cgi.ebay.com/RARE-FAIRCILD-A-10B-DESK-MODEL-PRECISE-NOT-TOPPING-/170612599563?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item27b94dab0b
 

Attachments

  • A-10b-5.jpg
    A-10b-5.jpg
    38.9 KB · Views: 202
  • A-10b-4.jpg
    A-10b-4.jpg
    44.5 KB · Views: 127
  • A-10b-3.jpg
    A-10b-3.jpg
    40.1 KB · Views: 467
  • A-10b-2.jpg
    A-10b-2.jpg
    41.9 KB · Views: 476
  • A-10b-1.jpg
    A-10b-1.jpg
    38.3 KB · Views: 486
madgepetto said:
About 10 years ago I was asked to do a one-off model A-10 in Aero-Union Fire bomber marking for the company here in Chico, CA, seems there was a plan afoot to get the things set up for fire retardant work...I still have the paint scheme drawing in here somewhere..it was a nice looking model, nothing came of it of course, but it would be impressive to see the Hog dousing fires around here...

Paul
Click to expand...

http://classic-web.archive.org/web/20060510010740/http://www.firehogs.com/a10demo.shtml
 
Model of Fairchild A-10B Thunderbolt II by Precise found on eBay.

URL:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Precise-Models-A-10-Variant-Night-Adverse-Weather-Warthog-NightHog-1-48-/180815044560?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item2a196a9fd0
 

Attachments

  • $(KGrHqV,!ncE63T0+q3jBPE6eMsk0Q~~60_3.jpg
    $(KGrHqV,!ncE63T0+q3jBPE6eMsk0Q~~60_3.jpg
    58.9 KB · Views: 108
  • $(KGrHqV,!iEE8IY-DE!RBPE6gQUrN!~~60_3.jpg
    $(KGrHqV,!iEE8IY-DE!RBPE6gQUrN!~~60_3.jpg
    32.7 KB · Views: 110
  • $(KGrHqZ,!qEE63Z2hzGeBPE6fl)ON!~~60_3.jpg
    $(KGrHqZ,!qEE63Z2hzGeBPE6fl)ON!~~60_3.jpg
    62.4 KB · Views: 107
  • $(KGrHqF,!psE63ZjQgDmBPE6ct,teQ~~60_3.jpg
    $(KGrHqF,!psE63ZjQgDmBPE6ct,teQ~~60_3.jpg
    40.6 KB · Views: 126
  • $(KGrHqJ,!g4E7P9OcI2TBPE6dzK!6Q~~60_3.jpg
    $(KGrHqJ,!g4E7P9OcI2TBPE6dzK!6Q~~60_3.jpg
    49.5 KB · Views: 123
  • $(KGrHqF,!h0E8J1v4IYzBPE6d,uyfw~~60_3.jpg
    $(KGrHqF,!h0E8J1v4IYzBPE6d,uyfw~~60_3.jpg
    48.8 KB · Views: 126
  • $(KGrHqR,!poE7Bcvhiq7BPE6dF,y7w~~60_3.jpg
    $(KGrHqR,!poE7Bcvhiq7BPE6dF,y7w~~60_3.jpg
    38 KB · Views: 130
  • $(KGrHqR,!ocE63(m!Z-EBPE6cW2GCw~~60_3.jpg
    $(KGrHqR,!ocE63(m!Z-EBPE6cW2GCw~~60_3.jpg
    40.7 KB · Views: 127
Model of Fairchild A-10B Thunderbolt II by Precise found on eBay.
 

Attachments

  • $(KGrHqR,!joE8MjRUVnMBPE6f8Yrg!~~60_3.jpg
    $(KGrHqR,!joE8MjRUVnMBPE6f8Yrg!~~60_3.jpg
    45 KB · Views: 1,330
  • $(KGrHqV,!nME63S988K-BPE6fPQ9-Q~~60_3.jpg
    $(KGrHqV,!nME63S988K-BPE6fPQ9-Q~~60_3.jpg
    36.3 KB · Views: 1,351
  • $(KGrHqF,!p8E63ZwgZ(3BPE6e6MOFQ~~60_3.jpg
    $(KGrHqF,!p8E63ZwgZ(3BPE6e6MOFQ~~60_3.jpg
    33.6 KB · Views: 1,391
Topping Fairchild A-10 prototype mode found on eBay.

Source:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/TOPPING-1-48-A10-PROTOTYPE-/200754794716?pt=UK_ToysGames_ModelKits_ModelKits_JN&hash=item2ebdeb10dc
 

Attachments

  • $(KGrHqNHJCsE91!upCN)BPpSFSL(5Q~~60_58.JPG
    $(KGrHqNHJCsE91!upCN)BPpSFSL(5Q~~60_58.JPG
    62.6 KB · Views: 1,347
  • $(KGrHqNHJCcE-fzUjb1BBPpSFoT)k!~~60_58.JPG
    $(KGrHqNHJCcE-fzUjb1BBPpSFoT)k!~~60_58.JPG
    38.6 KB · Views: 1,288
Model of Fairchild A-10 Night/Adverse Weather (N/AW), also known as A-10B, found on eBay.

Source:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/RARE-1979-FAIRCHILD-REPUBLIC-SOLID-RESIN-A-10-N-AW-PROTOTYPE-DESK-TOP-MODEL-/170936152684?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item27cc96b26c
 

Attachments

  • $(KGrHqZHJFEFBmCZeGi+BQlTDPipiQ~~60_12.JPG
    $(KGrHqZHJFEFBmCZeGi+BQlTDPipiQ~~60_12.JPG
    21.8 KB · Views: 144
  • $(KGrHqNHJEYFBlUtFOL2BQlTCuvHig~~60_12.JPG
    $(KGrHqNHJEYFBlUtFOL2BQlTCuvHig~~60_12.JPG
    24.3 KB · Views: 146
  • $T2eC16dHJGYE9noojie6BQlTDyNrhw~~60_12.JPG
    $T2eC16dHJGYE9noojie6BQlTDyNrhw~~60_12.JPG
    27.1 KB · Views: 150
  • $T2eC16JHJHoE9n3Kd7NsBQlTFU48Ww~~60_12.JPG
    $T2eC16JHJHoE9n3Kd7NsBQlTFU48Ww~~60_12.JPG
    27.7 KB · Views: 173

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom