Boeing Model 754

hesham

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
26 May 2006
Messages
33,528
Reaction score
13,603
My dears,

I just know that Boeing Model-754 was an airliner project
based on Burnelli design,do you have a drawing or more
informations about it ?.
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

I have seen drawings and pics of a model of it, and I think they were in old issues of Aviation Week.

If this isn't it in the link below, it's very similar.

Boeing Lifting Body Aircraft
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

Working together we are invincible ! ;D
Thanks, Sundog ! I hadn't found a Boeing 754, but your clue with
the Aviation Week and the link made me looking for this design,
without designation:
(from Aviation Week 1974 14-25)
And now it's time for the last x-mas preparations !
 

Attachments

  • Boeing-transport-concept.JPG
    Boeing-transport-concept.JPG
    42.6 KB · Views: 1,011
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report



Thanks my dear Jemiba and Sundog.
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

I believe having found this on the web a few years ago on a site dedicated to Burnelli. Is it useful, hesham?
 

Attachments

  • Boeing 754-Seite.jpg
    Boeing 754-Seite.jpg
    151.6 KB · Views: 946
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

Thanks my dear boxkite,

and welcome your returning.
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

Artist's impression of the Boeing Model 754 from Cargolux 1975 Annual Report. Cargolux was to be a launch customer of the aircraft.
 

Attachments

  • cargolux.jpg
    cargolux.jpg
    86 KB · Views: 780
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

OK -- I want one of each.
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

Give me a full bag of Snickers and bottles of Energy drinks and lock me for a few days away in that treasure cave at Boeing. :D
Great Clip!!! :)
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

Brilliant! Can this vault be visited by outside aviation historians with proper clearance? Or is it strictly for inhouse people?
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

Stargazer2006 said:
Brilliant! Can this vault be visited by outside aviation historians with proper clearance? Or is it strictly for inhouse people?
Click to expand...
I know that Dennis Jenkins visited the archives for his and Tony Landis' B-70 book. -SP
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

The setting reminded me of the picture below of Derek Meddings among the model shelves of Century 21 Productions - mmmmmm, models...

Martin
 

Attachments

  • Meddings.jpg
    Meddings.jpg
    76.4 KB · Views: 1,605
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

Stargazer2006 said:
Brilliant! Can this vault be visited by outside aviation historians with proper clearance?
Click to expand...


Used to be. No longer.

In late 2001, after passing through a few layers of security guards I was allowed to come in and wander the shelves. Two later trips (2003 and 2005) showed a progression in restrictions. In 2008 I had to sit my butt at a table and stay there.

I'm led to understand that I wouldn't get *that* far today. I'm also led to believe that in the 1990's your average Joe could more or less walk in right off the street.
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

Ah, the transonic 767....
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

Orionblamblam said:
Used to be. No longer.

In late 2001, after passing through a few layers of security guards I was allowed to come in and wander the shelves. Two later trips (2003 and 2005) showed a progression in restrictions. In 2008 I had to sit my butt at a table and stay there.

I'm led to understand that I wouldn't get *that* far today. I'm also led to believe that in the 1990's your average Joe could more or less walk in right off the street.
Click to expand...

Well at least Boeing did allow that news crew to get in. Of course, they probably had to fill ITAR forms in quadruplicate, consent to individual background checks, then wait 6 months and help a gaggle of Boeing lawyers justify their existence by paying dearly for every second of airtime... I'm surprised aim9xray hasn't yet been invoiced for posting the link.
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

circle-5 said:
Of course, they probably had to fill ITAR forms in quadruplicate...
Click to expand...

As previously noted, the video shows nought but civvie designs, none of the military ones (at least not clearly). I'm sure some of that is due to interest in Boeing these days being mostly wrapped around jetliners (the last actual Boeing - as opposed to one of their aquisitions - military product being... what? The B-52?), but the stacks are loaded with military and space models as well.
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

The International Husky (IH) is totally new for me. Please tell us the story. (pics,drawings, technical data, model number...)
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

Bet that Husky is making Burnelli roll over in his grave! :D
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

The Husky certainly is of interest...although I think in Raymer's textbook he feels that such a design would likely have a weight penalty versus a conventional design. Nonetheless, it looks like it would have plenty of cargo space.
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

XP67_Moonbat said:
Bet that Husky is making Burnelli roll over in his grave! :D
Click to expand...

In a sense. When Boeing came out with the design (for the International Husky Corporation), the Burnelli lawyers showed up. IIRC, the lawsuits helped quash the concept.
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

Maveric said:
The International Husky (IH) is totally new for me. Please tell us the story. (pics,drawings, technical data, model number...)
Click to expand...

Model 754-6F (this version), dating from 1973. This was the narrowest of the designs for International Husky.
 

Attachments

  • husky1.jpg
    husky1.jpg
    46.3 KB · Views: 996
  • husky2.jpg
    husky2.jpg
    66.8 KB · Views: 893
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

But I thought Burnelli had been involved with the early Model 754 designs like the one on the left?!? Wasn't it so?
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

Burnelli died in 1964. This design study dates from 1973.

From the Burnelli conspiracists:
http://www.aircrash.org/burnelli/cnsp8.htm

From the Smithsonian:
http://www.airspacemag.com/history-of-flight/The_Burnelli_Controversy.html?c=y&page=3

Boeing opted not to comment for this article. “We’re a little skittish on the whole subject of Burnelli,” a Boeing spokesman said.
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

Thank you Scott for clearing the confusion. This was so reminiscent of Burnelli that I must have assumed it to be a Burnelli-related project. My mistake.
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

Stargazer2006 said:
This was so reminiscent of Burnelli that I must have assumed it to be a Burnelli-related project.
Click to expand...

Lots of people thought so at the time (including the lawyers).

Here's the patent for one of the designs for Husky: http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=41Q9AAAAEBAJ&dq=D245157&num=10
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

Orionblamblam said:
Maveric said:
The International Husky (IH) is totally new for me. Please tell us the story. (pics,drawings, technical data, model number...)
Click to expand...

Model 754-6F (this version), dating from 1973. This was the narrowest of the designs for International Husky.
Click to expand...

Thanks for this great material!
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

So are they trying to argue that the idea of shaping an aircraft fuselage like an airfoil for extra body lift was trademarked by Burnelli? Doesn't make much sense to me to allow people to place claims on general functional concepts. You might as well be trademarking the concept of strakes, swept wings, 2-dimensional supersonic inlets, etc.
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

Orionblamblam said:
circle-5 said:
Of course, they probably had to fill ITAR forms in quadruplicate...
Click to expand...

As previously noted, the video shows nought but civvie designs, none of the military ones (at least not clearly). I'm sure some of that is due to interest in Boeing these days being mostly wrapped around jetliners (the last actual Boeing - as opposed to one of their aquisitions - military product being... what? The B-52?), but the stacks are loaded with military and space models as well.
Click to expand...

The local television news here in Seattle is fixated on the commercial airliner operations of the Boeing Company in the Puget Sound region, particularly the activities in and around the assembly plants at Renton and Everett. The rest of the operations that constitute the Boeing Company, such as Whichita, Philadelphia, St. Louis, and Charleston, are almost entirely ignored. Perhaps because so many people in the area are directly employed by the Boeing Commercial Airplane Company or work for contractors and suppliers who support Boeing's commercial airliner production lines in Renton and Everett. The economic fortunes of the Boeing Commercial Airplane Company effect the entire Puget Sound region. Layoffs at Boeing can send the entire region into a recession. The local news doesn't seem to be interested in Boeing's military or space operations, unless if it is, or will be, manufactured somewhere in the Puget Sound region.
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

Triton said:
It appears that Boeing was still looking at the design as late as 1977 as the Model 759.
Click to expand...

Not as "the" Model 759, but as "part of" the larger Model 759 program, which included tens of extremely different configurations.
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

Triton said:
It appears that Boeing was still looking at the design as late as 1977 as the Model 759-182A and the Model 759-214A

index.php

index.php



Source:
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,181.msg127169.html#msg127169
Click to expand...

If you use the search,you will find this;

http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,6982.0/highlight,boeing+759.html

and generally,the Model-759 was discussed here with a suggesting
for a competition between Boeing,Lockheed,Douglas (MDC) and NASA;

http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,6549.msg61020.html#msg61020
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

hesham said:
If you use the search,you will find this;

http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,6982.0/highlight,boeing+759.html

and generally,the Model-759 was discussed here with a suggesting
for a competition between Boeing,Lockheed,Douglas (MDC) and NASA;

http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,6549.msg61020.html#msg61020
Click to expand...

So what should I have done hesham? Should I have added the three-view drawing of the Boeing Model 759-214A design to the existing "Boeing Model 759-182" topic? The Boeing Model 759-192M three-view drawing to the existing "Boeing Model 759-165A Spanloader" topic? :-\ What should I do with the Lockheed-Georgia and McDonnell Douglas spanloader designs whose model numbers are not identified? Should I have placed them in the existing "Boeing Model 759-165A Spanloader" topic?
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

Model of Boeing Model 754 concept located in the Boeing Archives Bellevue, Washington.

Source:
http://airchive.com/html/museums/boeing-archives-bellevue-washington-usa/boeing-experimental-aircraft/19130
 

Attachments

  • 19130.jpg
    19130.jpg
    118.7 KB · Views: 962
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

OMG, what a plane...
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

Would Boeing have sold the plane as the 754? Or would the Boeing Marketing Department give the plane another designation? Like Boeing 777?
 
Re: Boeing Planes That Never Flew - News Report

Triton said:
Would Boeing have sold the plane as the 754? Or would the Boeing Marketing Department give the plane another designation? Like Boeing 777?
Click to expand...

Given the odd configuration, uncertain marketing success and coherence of the 7*7 line (not to mention that I'm not even sure any airline would have bought that!) I'd venture to consider they might have kept the "754" after all, or most probably, found a name for it. There was a similar project at Boeing called the Husky, if memory serves.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom