Convair Super Hustler, Fish and Kingfish

We just posted the Schweitzer painting for Part 4. Tell me what you think.


www.codeonemagazine.com

--C1
 
Very nice! Now if it were in a higher resolution. . .
 
A couple of shots of the SA-2S model that we just repaired and repainted. Too late for the article, but some of you may enjoy. I'll be posting a four-view at some point on our website. The wings actually swing out. Model is about two feet in length.

Beyond Kingfish article is here (for reference):

http://www.codeonemagazine.com/article.html?item_id=92
 

Attachments

  • Top_SA2S_copy.jpg
    Top_SA2S_copy.jpg
    29.9 KB · Views: 1,016
  • SA2S_SIDE_copy.jpg
    SA2S_SIDE_copy.jpg
    19.1 KB · Views: 1,022
Awesome, thanks for posting the model pics. That's one of my favorite designs from the article. :)
 
two more. the head-on and backside shots have some depth-of-field issues. Will have to get those reshot.
 

Attachments

  • SA2S_top_open.jpg
    SA2S_top_open.jpg
    160.1 KB · Views: 1,309
  • SA2S_bottom.jpg
    SA2S_bottom.jpg
    77.6 KB · Views: 1,296
SA-2S side view = Archipeppe's Avatar?... every day is a school day!

Orionblamblam said:
Try a strong telephoto lens at a great distance.
Click to expand...

Like Andreas Von Retyi's "experimental aircraft sighting" from Tikaboo in 1995? ;D (I am of course joking!)
 
Catalytic said:
SA-2S side view = Archipeppe's Avatar?... every day is a school day!
Click to expand...

Are you quite sure about this? The fins (fin?) in his avatar look considerably taller to me...
 
"Try a strong telephoto lens at a great distance"

or orthogonal camera if any. Due to missing orthogonal camera in Vue I have to use Carrara, too.
 
Stargazer2006 said:
Are you quite sure about this? The fins (fin?) in his avatar look considerably taller to me...
Click to expand...

You are of course quite right about the fin... maybe we should ask the man himself!

I had convinced myself that the nose and underslung Marquardt ramjet "twin pack" were defining features of the SA-2S configuration (and that these are also visable in his avatar picture)
 
My only complaint is that they don't give us more resolution. :(
 
As least for building 3-D models from them, there is no such thing as "too much resolution". ;D
 

Attachments

  • HV_1_Lines_1267828237_3457_1200x.jpg
    HV_1_Lines_1267828237_3457_1200x.jpg
    103.9 KB · Views: 441
Not sure if already posted ...

http://www.afwing.com/intro/convair_supersonic/hustler-1.htm
http://www.afwing.com/intro/convair_supersonic2/hustler-1.htm
 

Attachments

  • Super Hustler via AFwing 1.jpg
    Super Hustler via AFwing 1.jpg
    141.3 KB · Views: 1,237

Attachments

  • SuperH-4-27_2012_beyond_17W_Config_C_3_01_1267828237_3576-672x446.jpg
    SuperH-4-27_2012_beyond_17W_Config_C_3_01_1267828237_3576-672x446.jpg
    157.8 KB · Views: 360
  • SuperH-4-26_2012_beyond_16W_Config_B_2_1267828237_8089-672x454.jpg
    SuperH-4-26_2012_beyond_16W_Config_B_2_1267828237_8089-672x454.jpg
    176.1 KB · Views: 339
  • SuperH-4-13_2012_beyond_10W_Config_SA_1_1267828237_3728.jpg
    SuperH-4-13_2012_beyond_10W_Config_SA_1_1267828237_3728.jpg
    66.4 KB · Views: 821
  • TJ-70.jpg
    TJ-70.jpg
    48.4 KB · Views: 821
  • SuperH-4-28_2012_beyond_18W_Config_C_3alt_01_1267828237_221.jpg
    SuperH-4-28_2012_beyond_18W_Config_C_3alt_01_1267828237_221.jpg
    251.4 KB · Views: 975
  • SuperH-4-01_2012_beyond_01V_opener_1267828237_4396-up.jpg
    SuperH-4-01_2012_beyond_01V_opener_1267828237_4396-up.jpg
    299.6 KB · Views: 1,018
I posted too soon, didn't have a chance to read the whole thread when I posted. The contributors to that site are quite skilled and produce some high quality fictional designs.
 
This site is the confusing Internet site. ;D
 

Attachments

  • SuperH-4-23_2012_beyond_13W_Config_SUB_6_1267828237_4077-672x448.jpg
    SuperH-4-23_2012_beyond_13W_Config_SUB_6_1267828237_4077-672x448.jpg
    44.7 KB · Views: 352
  • SuperH-4-24_2012_beyond_14W_Sail_Wing_1267828237_7712-672x352.jpg
    SuperH-4-24_2012_beyond_14W_Sail_Wing_1267828237_7712-672x352.jpg
    66.6 KB · Views: 323
  • SuperH-4-25_2012_beyond_15W_Config_R_3_1267828237_1912-672x440.jpg
    SuperH-4-25_2012_beyond_15W_Config_R_3_1267828237_1912-672x440.jpg
    138 KB · Views: 361
Delta Force said:
I posted too soon, didn't have a chance to read the whole thread when I posted. The contributors to that site are quite skilled and produce some high quality fictional designs.
Click to expand...

The illustrations you posted are completely legit and were originally posted on Lockheed Martin's official site.
 
Recently I can't watch Code One site by Internet explorer. :-[
Please show me how to watch the site.
 

Attachments

  • SuperH-4-14_2012_beyond_11W_Config_SA_2S5_1267828237_3614.jpg
    SuperH-4-14_2012_beyond_11W_Config_SA_2S5_1267828237_3614.jpg
    74 KB · Views: 364
  • from code one 1.jpg
    from code one 1.jpg
    40.4 KB · Views: 352
  • from code one 2.jpg
    from code one 2.jpg
    71.1 KB · Views: 342
Direct link to unbuilt projects:

www.codeonemagazine.com

Aircraft Design Studies | Code One Magazine

Recently released preliminary design drawings from the deepest files in the Lockheed Martin archives are exposed in this exclusive online collection.
www.codeonemagazine.com
 
Last edited by a moderator:
SDASM has posted 2 illustrations of Convair "FISH" (First Invisible Super Hustler) design.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/sdasmarchives/43685689585/in/photostream/
 

Attachments

  • Convair FISH (First Invisible Super Hustler) design art SDASM -1.jpg
    Convair FISH (First Invisible Super Hustler) design art SDASM -1.jpg
    84.2 KB · Views: 507
  • Convair FISH (First Invisible Super Hustler) design art SDASM -2.jpg
    Convair FISH (First Invisible Super Hustler) design art SDASM -2.jpg
    78.5 KB · Views: 464
OM said:
Orionblamblam said:
OM said:
...Wasn't this one of the "Kingfish" proposal designs that was batted about?
Click to expand...

No, but it was an ancestor design.
Click to expand...

...That's why I thought I'd seen it before. Came across it one time during my OXCART research back in the late 90's, albeit in a "napkin sketch" form. A "Fish" proposal, then?
Click to expand...
The Fish proposal was an ancestor of the Kingfish; FISH stands for First Invisible Super Hustler because it was intended as a reconnaissance derivative of the Super Hustler. More info on the Fish can be found at http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/planes/q0287.shtml.
 
Just curious, how was the combination intended to take off ? The Hustlers nose undercarriage is covered by the Fish vehicle, im wondering if any drawings show the intended setup?
 
TsrJoe said:
Just curious, how was the combination intended to take off ? The Hustlers nose undercarriage is covered by the Fish vehicle, im wondering if any drawings show the intended setup?
Click to expand...

The noses of both the Super Hustler and the FISH were designed to fold down and back 180 degrees while underneath the B-58. This would clear space for the B-58 nosegear for takeoff. The nose would fold into place after nose gear retraction.
 
Jay Miller via Jim Goodall
 

Attachments

  • 62392417_10219057063928556_6250765746125668352_o.jpg
    62392417_10219057063928556_6250765746125668352_o.jpg
    230.3 KB · Views: 264
  • 62065815_10219057064008558_7423156165686591488_o.jpg
    62065815_10219057064008558_7423156165686591488_o.jpg
    232.5 KB · Views: 249
  • 62136174_10219057063688550_4901771086011564032_o.jpg
    62136174_10219057063688550_4901771086011564032_o.jpg
    200.7 KB · Views: 247
  • 62519625_10219057067008633_5689833383656423424_o.jpg
    62519625_10219057067008633_5689833383656423424_o.jpg
    224.2 KB · Views: 266
  • 62354064_10219057065888605_2074864731801255936_o.jpg
    62354064_10219057065888605_2074864731801255936_o.jpg
    273.4 KB · Views: 313

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom