aonestudio
I really should change my personal text
- Joined
- 11 March 2018
- Messages
- 2,576
- Reaction score
- 6,021
Always figured that to be the case when people were harping on about shells per day and 9,000 vs 20,000. You can fire 100,000 unguided shells per day and miss with every single one, FPVs, not so much.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQ0Gea7bOUk
Always figured that to be the case when people were harping on about shells per day and 9,000 vs 20,000. You can fire 100,000 unguided shells per day and miss with every single one, FPVs, not so much.
There is no reason to concentrate infantry when infantry firepower is not important. It appears to me that troops are forward mostly to dig and occupy defensive fortification and a highly dispersed approach is fine.I suspect on the Ukrainian side at least the lack of shells has produced this effect. Artillery is still vastly more effective against troops in the open.
There is no reason to concentrate infantry when infantry firepower is not important. It appears to me that troops are forward mostly to dig and occupy defensive fortification and a highly dispersed approach is fine.
...UAVs as a core part of a modern Western land force.
the Autors must drink poison for this.
Core part of modern warfare is an reconnaissance and strike contour, which has only a part of the UAV.
Without artillery, aviation, tanks and comunication troops your core part is shit
P.S. Admin, you'd better get back from repression to the subject area.
There is no reason to concentrate infantry when infantry firepower is not important. It appears to me that troops are forward mostly to dig and occupy defensive fortification and a highly dispersed approach is fine.
You don't need an assault section against a foxhole. There is enough videos of drone bombing against foxholes and trenches to show that it is not really defensible in the long term."Highly dispersed" is relative. A five to seven man assault section against a two man foxhole is a very serious attack these days.
So how do you attack such positions?
One really has to wonder just what the cost of one of these bespoke military spec quadcopters will be compared to an off the shelf mavic....Teledyne unveils Rogue 1 exploding drone sought by Marine Corps
Should the Rogue 1 drone not explode or be recalled, it can be disarmed and reused thanks to a mechanical disconnect.www.defensenews.com
View attachment 728184
View: https://x.com/TotherChris/status/1787849770033172484
As always it depends on how many you make.One really has to wonder just what the cost of one of these bespoke military spec quadcopters will be compared to an off the shelf mavic....
5x,10x,20x?
I suspect this will probably only be purchased in very small numbers [if at all].
But it does raise the question of how western militaries are going to equip themselves with something like a mavic when buying off the shelf chinese drones is likely a total non starter both for political and technological/security reasons.